| Revision as of 14:49, 4 April 2016 editP199 (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, IP block exemptions, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers55,327 edits →Grand-Calumet← Previous edit | Revision as of 16:06, 4 April 2016 edit undoSerial Number 54129 (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Page movers, New page reviewers, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers99,462 edits Warning: Violating the three-revert rule on L'Île-du-Grand-Calumet, Quebec. (TW)Next edit → | ||
| Line 63: | Line 63: | ||
| == March 2016 == | == March 2016 == | ||
| <div class="user-block" style="min-height: 40px"> ] You have been ''']''' from editing for a period of '''31 hours''' for ]. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to ]. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may ] by first reading the ], then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: <!-- Copy the text as it appears on your page, not as it appears in this edit area. Do not include the "tlx|" code. -->{{tlx|unblock|2=reason=''Your reason here ~~~~''}}.<p>During a dispute, you should first try to ] and seek ]. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek ], and in some cases it may be appropriate to request ]. ] (]) 01:32, 30 March 2016 (UTC)</p></div><!-- Template:uw-ewblock --> | <div class="user-block" style="min-height: 40px"> ] You have been ''']''' from editing for a period of '''31 hours''' for ]. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to ]. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may ] by first reading the ], then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: <!-- Copy the text as it appears on your page, not as it appears in this edit area. Do not include the "tlx|" code. -->{{tlx|unblock|2=reason=''Your reason here ~~~~''}}.<p>During a dispute, you should first try to ] and seek ]. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek ], and in some cases it may be appropriate to request ]. ] (]) 01:32, 30 March 2016 (UTC)</p></div><!-- Template:uw-ewblock --> | ||
| == April 2016 == | |||
| ] Your recent editing history at ] shows that you are currently engaged in an ]. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the article's ] to work toward making a version that represents ] among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See ] for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant ] or seek ]. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary ]. | |||
| '''Being involved in an edit war can result in your being ]'''—especially if you violate the ], which states that an editor must not perform more than three ] on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—'''even if you don't violate the three-revert rule'''—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.{{Break}}''Having recently come of a block for edit-warring, I would suggest that it is unwise to immediately recommence the same behaviour. Bon chance.''<!-- Template:uw-3rr --> ] <sup>''''']'''''</sup> 16:06, 4 April 2016 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 16:06, 4 April 2016
Welcome
Hello, Brissard, and Welcome to Misplaced Pages!Welcome to Misplaced Pages! I hope you enjoy the encyclopedia and want to stay. As a first step, you may wish to read the Introduction.
If you have any questions, feel free to ask me at my talk page – I'm happy to help. Or, you can ask your question at the New contributors' help page.
Here are some more resources to help you as you explore and contribute to the world's largest encyclopedia...
Finding your way around:
|
Need help?
|
|
How you can help:
|
|
Additional tips...
|
Grand-Calumet
Please discuss changes at the talk page first, as per WP:BRD. Repeated reversals of edits without discussing them is against WP policy. -- P 1 9 9 ✉ 03:23, 24 March 2016 (UTC)
- This is the last warning to engage in discussion at Talk:L'Île-du-Grand-Calumet, Quebec before I will move it to Misplaced Pages:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring. -- P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:05, 24 March 2016 (UTC)
I have once more discussed your changes on Talk:L'Île-du-Grand-Calumet, Quebec, now in more detail. Instead of just reverting and ignoring the warnings and block, please discuss the changes there. -- P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:45, 4 April 2016 (UTC)
Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Misplaced Pages:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Misplaced Pages's policy on edit warring. Thank you. -- P 1 9 9 ✉ 21:46, 24 March 2016 (UTC)
March 2016
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. Drmies (talk) 01:32, 30 March 2016 (UTC)
April 2016
Your recent editing history at L'Île-du-Grand-Calumet, Quebec shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.
Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.
Having recently come of a block for edit-warring, I would suggest that it is unwise to immediately recommence the same behaviour. Bon chance. Fortuna 16:06, 4 April 2016 (UTC)