Misplaced Pages

Redox signaling: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 12:48, 28 February 2013 editSmokefoot (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers74,619 edits #REDIRECT Reactive oxygen species, disputed "walled garden" written and maintained by Peter Proctor, see Misplaced Pages:Sockpuppet investigations/Pproctor/Archive← Previous edit Revision as of 13:42, 17 April 2016 edit undo124.188.116.37 (talk) recommended for deletionNext edit →
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Proposed deletion/dated
|concern = The article at Reactive oxygen species makes no attempt to explain redox signaling in the context of ROS and in fact makes no mention of redox signaling at all. As redox signaling is:
* subject to current research (])
* featured heavily in the promotion of products such as ASEA (http://www.redoxsignalingwater.com/)
* also subject to controversy regarding the effectiveness of products such as ASEA (for example http://www.sciencebasedmedicine.org/accused-of-lying-about-asea-not-guilty/),
it seems that it should either have its own page, or the ROS page should be expanded to deal with redox signaling as well.
This deletion is recommended because, as this page only redirects to the ROS page, significant confusion could be caused about the role of redox signaling in the body: a reader could easily come to believe that redox signaling and ROS damage are one and the same, or at least closely interlinked; however they are in fact quite separate concepts, and indeed both redox signaling and ROS are vital to various biological processes. Because of this high potential for confusion, especially in the context of the controversy over "redox signaling water", this redirect is inappropriate and should be deleted; in its place an article could be written about redox signaling.
|timestamp = 20160417134205
}}

#REDIRECT ] #REDIRECT ]

Revision as of 13:42, 17 April 2016

It is proposed that this article be deleted because of the following concern:

The article at Reactive oxygen species makes no attempt to explain redox signaling in the context of ROS and in fact makes no mention of redox signaling at all. As redox signaling is:

it seems that it should either have its own page, or the ROS page should be expanded to deal with redox signaling as well.

This deletion is recommended because, as this page only redirects to the ROS page, significant confusion could be caused about the role of redox signaling in the body: a reader could easily come to believe that redox signaling and ROS damage are one and the same, or at least closely interlinked; however they are in fact quite separate concepts, and indeed both redox signaling and ROS are vital to various biological processes. Because of this high potential for confusion, especially in the context of the controversy over "redox signaling water", this redirect is inappropriate and should be deleted; in its place an article could be written about redox signaling.

If you can address this concern by improving, copyediting, sourcing, renaming, or merging the page, please edit this page and do so. You may remove this message if you improve the article or otherwise object to deletion for any reason. Although not required, you are encouraged to explain why you object to the deletion, either in your edit summary or on the talk page. If this template is removed, do not replace it.

This message has remained in place for seven days, so the article may be deleted without further notice.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article so that it is acceptable according to the deletion policy.
Find sources: "Redox signaling" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR
PRODExpired+%5B%5BWP%3APROD%7CPROD%5D%5D%2C+concern+was%3A+The+article+at+Reactive+oxygen+species+makes+no+attempt+to+explain+redox+signaling+in+the+context+of+ROS+and+in+fact+makes+no+mention+of+redox+signaling+at+all.+As+redox+signaling+is%3A+%0A%2A+subject+to+current+research+%28%5B%5BAntioxidants+%26+Redox+Signaling%5D%5D%29%0A%2A+featured+heavily+in+the+promotion+of+products+such+as+ASEA+%28http%3A%2F%2Fwww.redoxsignalingwater.com%2F%29%0A%2A+also+subject+to+controversy+regarding+the+effectiveness+of+products+such+as+ASEA+%28for+example+http%3A%2F%2Fwww.sciencebasedmedicine.org%2Faccused-of-lying-about-asea-not-guilty%2F%29%2C%0Ait+seems+that+it+should+either+have+its+own+page%2C+or+the+ROS+page+should+be+expanded+to+deal+with+redox+signaling+as+well.%0AThis+deletion+is+recommended+because%2C+as+this+page+only+redirects+to+the+ROS+page%2C+significant+confusion+could+be+caused+about+the+role+of+redox+signaling+in+the+body%3A+a+reader+could+easily+come+to+believe+that+redox+signaling+and+ROS+damage+are+one+and+the+same%2C+or+at+least+closely+interlinked%3B+however+they+are+in+fact+quite+separate+concepts%2C+and+indeed+both+redox+signaling+and+ROS+are+vital+to+various+biological+processes.+Because+of+this+high+potential+for+confusion%2C+especially+in+the+context+of+the+controversy+over+%22redox+signaling+water%22%2C+this+redirect+is+inappropriate+and+should+be+deleted%3B+in+its+place+an+article+could+be+written+about+redox+signaling.Expired ], concern was: The article at Reactive oxygen species makes no attempt to explain redox signaling in the context of ROS and in fact makes no mention of redox signaling at all. As redox signaling is:

it seems that it should either have its own page, or the ROS page should be expanded to deal with redox signaling as well.

This deletion is recommended because, as this page only redirects to the ROS page, significant confusion could be caused about the role of redox signaling in the body: a reader could easily come to believe that redox signaling and ROS damage are one and the same, or at least closely interlinked; however they are in fact quite separate concepts, and indeed both redox signaling and ROS are vital to various biological processes. Because of this high potential for confusion, especially in the context of the controversy over "redox signaling water", this redirect is inappropriate and should be deleted; in its place an article could be written about redox signaling.
Nominator: Please consider notifying the author/project: {{subst:proposed deletion notify|Redox signaling|concern=The article at Reactive oxygen species makes no attempt to explain redox signaling in the context of ROS and in fact makes no mention of redox signaling at all. As redox signaling is: * subject to current research (]) * featured heavily in the promotion of products such as ASEA (http://www.redoxsignalingwater.com/) * also subject to controversy regarding the effectiveness of products such as ASEA (for example http://www.sciencebasedmedicine.org/accused-of-lying-about-asea-not-guilty/), it seems that it should either have its own page, or the ROS page should be expanded to deal with redox signaling as well. This deletion is recommended because, as this page only redirects to the ROS page, significant confusion could be caused about the role of redox signaling in the body: a reader could easily come to believe that redox signaling and ROS damage are one and the same, or at least closely interlinked; however they are in fact quite separate concepts, and indeed both redox signaling and ROS are vital to various biological processes. Because of this high potential for confusion, especially in the context of the controversy over "redox signaling water", this redirect is inappropriate and should be deleted; in its place an article could be written about redox signaling.}} ~~~~
Timestamp: 20160417134205 13:42, 17 April 2016 (UTC)
Administrators: delete
  1. REDIRECT Reactive oxygen species
Category: