Misplaced Pages

Talk:Lie-to-children: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 23:20, 23 April 2016 editCirt (talk | contribs)199,086 edits updated.← Previous edit Revision as of 23:20, 23 April 2016 edit undoCirt (talk | contribs)199,086 edits OneClickArchiver archived This article should be deleted redirected. to Talk:Lie-to-children/Archive 1Next edit →
Line 64: Line 64:
|archive = Talk:Lie-to-children/Archive %(counter)d |archive = Talk:Lie-to-children/Archive %(counter)d
}} }}

== This article should be <s>deleted</s> <u>redirected</u>. ==

At the most recent deletion discussion some voters suggested keeping the ] part and deleting the lie-to-children part. No one supported keeping the latter. I have done the former, by removing the very limited material on Wittgenstein's latter to a new stub. The rest of the article is based on '']'' and passing mentions. I have checked again and there are no sources. Please <s>delete or</s> redirect this article. Pinging AfD participants: {{u|L.tak}}, {{u|Rhododendrites}}, {{u|James500}}, and also {{u|Aoidh}} who objected to redirecting it. --] (]) 02:12, 5 February 2016 (UTC)
Also {{u|Ganly}}. --] (]) 02:14, 5 February 2016 (UTC)
*I have no objection to '''redirecting''' to ]. &mdash; <tt>] <sup style="font-size:80%;">]</sup></tt> \\ 02:23, 5 February 2016 (UTC)
:*The issue is that's is 6 one way, half a dozen the other. ] wasn't even an article until some of this article was dumped over. I'd like to try to improve this one and trim out what doesn't belong, not least of all because this article has more to work with than a single sentence. - ] (]) 02:42, 5 February 2016 (UTC)
::*That's fine, but there are no sources. I hope I'm not being rude, but I don't see how this is happening. It is a neologism from a barely-notable book, which got a few passing mentions over the years in various places, probably because it had a Misplaced Pages article. --] (]) 02:45, 5 February 2016 (UTC)
::*{{ping|Aoidh}} Could you elaborate on how it's 6 one way, half dozen of the other? I think it's safe to say that if the subject were solely Lie-to-children, untangled from Wittegenstein's ladder, that there would be fairly straightforward consensus to delete or, most likely, redirect. I don't see anyone arguing to keep lie-to-children, and only expressing reservations because of Wittgenstein's ladder. Now that the latter was spun out, this article ''could'' be renominated, but it seems more efficient to just redirect and, on the off-chance sources can be found for "lie-to-children" as a distinct concept from Wittgenstein's ladder, it could always be recreated. I certainly don't see a need to delete the history. &mdash; <tt>] <sup style="font-size:80%;">]</sup></tt> \\ 02:53, 5 February 2016 (UTC)
:::*Just as a note, if text from this article was copied, ] so the article's history would have to remain intact. I'll respond tomorrow, as I have work (sorry). - ] (]) 03:03, 5 February 2016 (UTC)
::::*Struck deletion suggestion. I suggest redirecting to ], but not ] because I think the latter association, as well as the notion that this is a phrase widely used outside of the novel, originated on Misplaced Pages. --] (]) 03:33, 5 February 2016 (UTC)
::::::Comment on attribution: If the other article was created by copying content from here, and the resulting consensus is that this article here no longer should exist but be a redirect to that other article, then this article here should be renamed to there and its off-topic content removed. That preserves attribution of the content that remains. That's a pretty common outcome when retaining a kernel of an otherwise-muddled and non-worthy-as-such mess. But copying and redirecting (rather than deleting) so that the attribution is retained behind the redirect is reasonable too. ] (]) 06:39, 5 February 2016 (UTC)
*My provisional view is that it would be preferable to merge the material relating to ''Science of Discworld'' somewhere than to blank it without merger. ] (]) 06:02, 6 February 2016 (UTC)
*I tend to agree that there is not enough sourcing for a standalone article. Merger to either ] or ] (preferably the former) would be appropriate. ] (]) 18:05, 9 February 2016 (UTC)
*'''Oppose'''. This article should be kept where it is as its own standalone independent article on this subject. I've researched through archival research databases. I've successfully found independent significant secondary source coverage from multiple different academic and scholarly peer reviewed books and reference journals. Thank you, &mdash; ''']''' (]) 18:24, 25 February 2016 (UTC)
::{{ping|Cirt}} Can you actually say explicitly what the new sources are? --] (]) 18:30, 25 February 2016 (UTC)
:::'''Reply on status of ongoing research:''' Yes. But from my personal past experience on Misplaced Pages that would be a frivolous endeavor. Unfortunately, what is most effective in civil discourse is to simply improve the article itself with reliable secondary sources in order to demonstrate argumentation for retention and avoid having the article be attempted at being disappeared off of the face of Misplaced Pages. Current progress of research into multiple ] and ] sources that are ] as well as ]s and ]s is {{doing|ongoing}}. Thank you for your patience with this matter, &mdash; ''']''' (]) 18:43, 25 February 2016 (UTC)
*'''Update:''' I believe this now appears to be {{done|resolved}}, per {{u|Sammy1339}} giving me The Article Rescue Barnstar for my Quality improvement efforts on this article, at . Thank you, &mdash; ''']''' (]) 23:19, 28 February 2016 (UTC)


== Additional sources == == Additional sources ==

Revision as of 23:20, 23 April 2016

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Lie-to-children article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.
Article policies
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Archives: 1Auto-archiving period: 3 months 
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
April 9, 2004Guild of Copy EditorsCopyedited
April 23, 2016Good article nomineeListed
April 8, 2005Guild of Copy EditorsCopyedited
February 4, 2016Articles for deletionNo consensus
February 28, 2016Guild of Copy EditorsCopyedited
This article has not yet been rated on Misplaced Pages's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to multiple WikiProjects.
WikiProject iconDebating (inactive)
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Debating, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.DebatingWikipedia:WikiProject DebatingTemplate:WikiProject DebatingDebating
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
WikiProject iconEducation Low‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Education, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of education and education-related topics on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EducationWikipedia:WikiProject EducationTemplate:WikiProject Educationeducation
LowThis article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
WikiProject iconFreedom of speech Low‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Freedom of speech, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Freedom of speech on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Freedom of speechWikipedia:WikiProject Freedom of speechTemplate:WikiProject Freedom of speechFreedom of speech
LowThis article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
WikiProject iconHuman rights Low‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Human rights, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Human rights on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Human rightsWikipedia:WikiProject Human rightsTemplate:WikiProject Human rightsHuman rights
LowThis article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
WikiProject iconPhilosophy: Logic Low‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Philosophy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of content related to philosophy on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to support the project, please visit the project page, where you can get more details on how you can help, and where you can join the general discussion about philosophy content on Misplaced Pages.PhilosophyWikipedia:WikiProject PhilosophyTemplate:WikiProject PhilosophyPhilosophy
LowThis article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
Associated task forces:
/ 
Taskforce icon
Logic
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
WikiProject iconPolitics Low‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics
LowThis article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
WikiProject iconPopular culture (inactive)
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Popular culture, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.Popular cultureWikipedia:WikiProject Popular cultureTemplate:WikiProject Popular culturePopular culture
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
WikiProject iconPsychology Low‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Psychology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Psychology on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PsychologyWikipedia:WikiProject PsychologyTemplate:WikiProject Psychologypsychology
LowThis article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
WikiProject iconSociology Low‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Sociology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of sociology on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SociologyWikipedia:WikiProject SociologyTemplate:WikiProject Sociologysociology
LowThis article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Template:Find sources notice

Additional sources

Some additional sources at links above. :)

Cheers,

— Cirt (talk) 18:23, 25 February 2016 (UTC)

Added one. Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL. — Cirt (talk) 19:11, 27 February 2016 (UTC)
Added another. Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL. — Cirt (talk) 06:57, 28 February 2016 (UTC)

Quality improvement project - Lie-to-children

I've embarked on a Quality improvement project for Lie-to-children, first introduced as a phrase in The Science of Discworld.

If you've got recommendations for additional secondary sources that could be utilized to further improve the quality of the article, please suggest them here on the talk page.

Current status: Further research in several additional secondary sources including more scholarly and academic sources such as peer reviewed publications and academic journals is  ongoing......

Thank you for your time,

— Cirt (talk) 02:56, 26 February 2016 (UTC)

Trailing quotes in second paragraph.

The second paragraph ends in trailing quotes, without any opening quotes before. It's not clear exactly when the quoted text starts, so I've left as-is; if someone more familiar with this could tidy the phrase, that would be great. Aawood (talk) 12:40, 26 February 2016 (UTC)

Thank you for your helpful participation here. I'm confused, 2nd paragraph of which subsection? Could you give us a copy of the text you are referring to, here on the talk page? Thank you, — Cirt (talk) 13:01, 26 February 2016 (UTC)
The very second paragraph of the article, in the lede. 'The term was originally coined in the 2000 book The Science of Discworld by Terry Pratchett, Jack Cohen, and Ian Stewart. Pratchett, Cohen and Stewart wrote that the phrase referred to: a statement that is false, but which nevertheless leads the child's mind towards a more accurate explanation, one that the child will only be able to appreciate if it has been primed with the lie".' Note the quotation mark after 'lie', at the end, with no prior quotes. Aawood (talk) 19:20, 26 February 2016 (UTC)
Fixed it. Thank you! @Aawood:Look better? — Cirt (talk) 19:10, 27 February 2016 (UTC)
That's great, good job. Aawood (talk) 11:58, 1 March 2016 (UTC)
Thanks! — Cirt (talk) 12:03, 1 March 2016 (UTC)

Phrase itself used as title of academic journal article about subject itself

The concept of lie-to-children was discussed at-length in 2000 by Andrew Sawyer in the Hungarian Journal of English and American Studies, where the subject itself was included in the article title: "Narrativium and Lies-to-Children: 'Palatable Instruction in 'The Science of Discworld'".

Enjoy,

— Cirt (talk) 04:49, 28 February 2016 (UTC)

Nominated for GA

I've nominated this article for Good Article quality consideration, at Good Article nominations. — Cirt (talk) 23:48, 28 February 2016 (UTC)

Differentiate term originated with NON fiction books

We want to make sure to emphasize and differentiate to the reader that the term originated first with Cohen and Stewart in their first two (2), NON fiction books. — Cirt (talk) 17:31, 29 February 2016 (UTC)

@Reil:I made some tweaks to try to improve with copy editing, let me know if that looks alright to you, bearing in mind I'd like to emphasize the first two (2) books are NON fiction and written solely by scientists. :) — Cirt (talk) 17:43, 29 February 2016 (UTC)
That's what I thought you were going for; it was just felt a bit bulky, y'know? I like your more recent take on it. Your recent work on the article's been putting a lot of substance into it, which is good, given the recent movement to delete it. Cheers! Reil (talk) 17:46, 29 February 2016 (UTC)
Thanks very much for the kind words about my Quality improvement efforts to this article, Reil, and thank you for your helpful copy edits. Most appreciated! — Cirt (talk) 17:48, 29 February 2016 (UTC)

Prior GA Review

This article had a prior GA Review and was unfortunately not promoted to WP:GA quality at that time. Suggestions on further quality improvement may be seen at: Talk:Lie-to-children/GA1. — Cirt (talk) 23:20, 23 April 2016 (UTC)

Categories: