Misplaced Pages

Revision as of 20:09, 24 April 2016

Your GA nomination of Title (EP)

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Title (EP) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of SNUGGUMS -- SNUGGUMS (talk) 00:01, 20 April 2015 (UTC)

See my comments here. Snuggums (talk / edits) 06:24, 21 April 2015 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Title (EP)

The article Title (EP) you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Title (EP) for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of SNUGGUMS -- SNUGGUMS (talk) 06:41, 21 April 2015 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Title (EP)

The article Title (EP) you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Title (EP) for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of SNUGGUMS -- SNUGGUMS (talk) 19:01, 21 April 2015 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Teamwork Barnstar
	for your work on bringing Title (EP) to Good Article status!!! Cheers! WordSeventeen (talk) 11:22, 25 April 2015 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Tireless Contributor Barnstar
	You deserve this for bringing an article to GA status. It's something you should be proud of. Calidum T|C 22:04, 26 April 2015 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Brilliant Idea Barnstar
	Welcome back from your respite. Cheers! WordSeventeen (talk) 16:43, 30 April 2015 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Special Barnstar
	Thank you for atleast trying with WV , I guess you knew it was gonna be a waste of time from the start but thank you for atleast trying!, At the end of the day you tried patching things up and that's all you can do - If they don't wanna know then that's there problem not yours, Just stay away and enjoy editing here :) Thanks again and well Happy Editing, –Davey2010 17:15, 30 April 2015 (UTC)

I see you know how to use TimedText...

...And are far better at getting the caption timings right than I am. There's a long list of TimedText pages with broken captions to fix, if you're interested in helping out. What funner way can there be to spend Christmas</s>? There's not really any central hub pages for TimedText (closest is WP:WPACCESS), so I thought I might as well personally inform you about it. Brustopher (talk) 21:53, 20 December 2015 (UTC)

@Brustopher:That sounds great. :) Will get right to it... --MaranoFan (talk) 21:54, 20 December 2015 (UTC)

A cup of tea for you!

Welcome back, I hope you decide to stay permanently this time! Don't let anyone chase you off, and at the same time always remember to step back for a short while if you think you may be possibly causing trouble. Happy editing and happy holidays! Azealia911 talk 13:48, 22 December 2015 (UTC)

All I Ask (Adele song) Edits

I wasn't aware that those kinds of links were discouraged. Is there somewhere I can read about that? -©2016 Compassionate727 15:24, 15 January 2016 (UTC)

@Compassionate727:I'm glad you show interest. They aren't discouraged per se, but its become a general layout for song articles now. See Fas and GAs like Single Ladies (Put a Ring on It) and If I Were a Boy for examples. --MaranoFan (talk) 15:30, 15 January 2016 (UTC)

Oh, okay, thanks. Happy editing! -©2016 Compassionate727 15:32, 15 January 2016 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Random Acts of Kindness Barnstar
	Thanks for all of your support during the failed GA nomination review of Billy the Kid. You are one of a handful of editors here that has been helpful and friendly to me. Thanks also for your idea to go ahead and make a page. I did. Please stop by and check it out! Jilllyjo (talk) 03:56, 15 February 2016 (UTC)

Artwork

Hi, could you upload the cover of "No"? is Meghan's icon on Twitter. Is on her Instagram as well. Cornerstonepicker (talk) 19:08, 1 March 2016 (UTC)

Btw, I'm sure it should be on the main space already. Cornerstonepicker (talk) 07:36, 2 March 2016 (UTC)

I am deleting the article to move the draft--MaranoFan (talk) 07:51, 2 March 2016 (UTC)

Thank You (Meghan Trainor album) artwork

So have you seen it yet?! I'm so excited for the pre-order! Here's the link to the file page. ilovechristianmusic 19:11, 3 March 2016 (UTC)

P.S. I entered in the album's page, but it re-directed to her discography. It looks like it can be edited back to the album page when the draft is moved, though. ilovechristianmusic 19:11, 3 March 2016 (UTC)

Thank You (Meghan Trainor album) has been nominated for Did You Know

Hello, MaranoFan. Thank You (Meghan Trainor album), an article you either created or significantly contributed to, has been nominated  to appear on Misplaced Pages's Main Page as part of Did you know. You can see the hook and the discussion here. You are welcome to participate! Thank you. APersonBot (talk!) 03:30, 11 March 2016 (UTC)

ur edits are awesome!! great job

Katelyn j13 (talk) 23:03, 5 April 2016 (UTC)

Misplaced Pages:Featured article candidates/Emily Ratajkowski/archive3

I am taking one last run at getting Emily Ratajkowski promoted to WP:FA in time for a 25th birthday WP:TFA on June 7th. Misplaced Pages:Featured article candidates/Emily Ratajkowski/archive3 needs discussants. Since you were a Misplaced Pages:Featured article candidates/Emily Ratajkowski/archive1 supporter, I am hoping you might give some comments.--TonyTheTiger (T / C / WP:FOUR / WP:CHICAGO / WP:WAWARD) 01:34, 23 March 2016 (UTC)

DYK for Thank You (Meghan Trainor album)

On 26 March 2016, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Thank You (Meghan Trainor album), which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the original tracklist of Thank You was revamped after the creation of its lead single "No"? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Thank You (Meghan Trainor album). You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, daily totals), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

— Coffee // have a cup // beans // 13:57, 26 March 2016 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Lips Are Movin

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Lips Are Movin you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of EditorE -- EditorE (talk) 11:21, 29 March 2016 (UTC)

Your support at Gaga list

Hey, thanks for your support at the Gaga list. I believe we have not met before; it's nice to meet you. ツ FrB.TG (talk) 10:02, 30 March 2016 (UTC)

Thanks so much. I am always on the lookout for good articles and editors. You, certainly are one.--MaranoFan (talk) 10:03, 30 March 2016 (UTC)

DYK

Hello! Your submission of Watch Me Do at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Philafrenzy (talk) 21:53, 30 March 2016 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

		The Reviewer Barnstar
		Not sure if this is the correct barnstar, but I want to give it to you for your incredible review on Gaga's Applause song! BRAVO!!! GagaNutella 15:18, 1 April 2016 (UTC)

@GagaNutella: Thank you so much, it ws my first review too. Here's to many more. ;)--MaranoFan (talk) 16:34, 1 April 2016 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Special Barnstar
	I just want to let you know that your amazing work for this encyclopaedia is highly appreciated. Thank you for everything you've done! JAGUAR  21:41, 2 April 2016 (UTC)

@Jaguar:Same to you. Please know that you are amazing and no amount of people that strive to belittle you will make you any less of that. Thanks for brightening my day. (He'll hopefully be blocked soon).--MaranoFan (talk) 06:42, 3 April 2016 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of All I Ask (Adele song)

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article All I Ask (Adele song) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Carbrera -- Carbrera (talk) 01:21, 8 April 2016 (UTC)

Daily Mail

Hi MaranoFan – regarding your edits on "Love Me Like You", I personally am not that fussed about your deletion of what you consdier unreliable sources, as I don't feel the information supplied is amazingly important to the article anyway. I'm just wondering, however, why you consider the Daily Mail to be an unreliable source. Granted, it's a tabloid newspaper, but still the second biggest-selling daily national newspaper in the UK, and probably more reliable that some of the other sources left in there. I do agree with you, however, that this article and several others probably should not have passed GA given the reliability of some of the sources. Cheers. Richard3120 (talk) 18:33, 9 April 2016 (UTC)

@Richard3120: Search the WP:RSN for Daily Mail. Several archived discussions determine it as unsuitable for use.--MaranoFan (talk) 18:45, 9 April 2016 (UTC)

Fair enough, thank you for pointing me to those links. Like I said, in the case of what amounts to celebrity gossip like this, I'm not sure how much it really contributes to the article anyway, regardless of whether the source is considered credible or not. And personally I have no time for a newspaper that probably considers Donald Trump to be a bit of a lefty liberal communist. Richard3120 (talk) 19:08, 9 April 2016 (UTC)

DYK for Watch Me Do

On 11 April 2016, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Watch Me Do, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Meghan Trainor's "Watch Me Do" references a number of rap songs? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Watch Me Do. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, daily totals), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 00:27, 11 April 2016 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Lips Are Movin

The article Lips Are Movin you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Lips Are Movin for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of EditorE -- EditorE (talk) 20:41, 12 April 2016 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Lips Are Movin

The article Lips Are Movin you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Lips Are Movin for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of EditorE -- EditorE (talk) 10:21, 14 April 2016 (UTC)

Autopatrolled granted

Hi MaranoFan, I just wanted to let you know that I have added the "autopatrolled" permission to your account, as you have created numerous, valid articles. This feature will have no effect on your editing, and is simply intended to reduce the workload on new page patrollers. For more information on the patroller right, see Misplaced Pages:Autopatrolled. Feel free to leave me a message if you have any questions. Happy editing! — MusikAnimal 17:59, 14 April 2016 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Dear Future Husband

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Dear Future Husband you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Jaguar -- Jaguar (talk) 20:01, 20 April 2016 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Dear Future Husband

The article Dear Future Husband you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Dear Future Husband for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Jaguar -- Jaguar (talk) 20:21, 20 April 2016 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of All I Ask (Adele song)

The article All I Ask (Adele song) you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:All I Ask (Adele song) for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Carbrera -- Carbrera (talk) 02:01, 21 April 2016 (UTC)

@Softlavender: Could you be bothered to address these concerns in my absence. You are one of the largest contributors to the article. Thanks in advance.--MaranoFan (talk) 16:45, 24 April 2016 (UTC)

Hi MaranoFan, I don't have any time to spare as I'm behind on, and neck deep in, an Arbcom filing, and in monitoring the very long and currently very active Prince (musician) article; plus things that I have gotten backlogged on because I didn't have a decent computer for two weeks. Furthermore, I actually know practically zilch about Adele and even less about that song. That article only came to my attention after I happened to see an AfD of a notable song by Adele, so I was collecting Google links about some of her songs. Perhaps the other Adele editors could help, or perhaps you could request a special dispensation for a continuance of the GAR when you return. Softlavender (talk) 17:03, 24 April 2016 (UTC)

Wiki Project?

I came across your Wiki Project on Ms. Trainor. Nice work! Would you maybe want to help me set one up for Drake Bell? — Preceding unsigned comment added by FHB7695 (talk • contribs) 05:10, 21 April 2016 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Dear Future Husband

The article Dear Future Husband you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Dear Future Husband for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Jaguar -- Jaguar (talk) 10:41, 21 April 2016 (UTC)

Yeah, the bot sometimes makes those mistakes... it can get embarrassing. JAGUAR  14:40, 21 April 2016 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Like I'm Gonna Lose You

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Like I'm Gonna Lose You you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Jaguar -- Jaguar (talk) 17:01, 22 April 2016 (UTC)

Blocked for a month

If you don't stop with the continuous non-stop battleground approach, I expect the next one will likely be indefinite. --Floquenbeam (talk) 17:24, 22 April 2016 (UTC)

@Floquenbeam: I haven't even been interacting with him. It is horribly unfair to block me for this, especially since he has been provoking me by going to my GAs and articles. I didn't even respond to the ANI thread. It is starting to feel like anyone can start bogus ani threads with my name and I would be blamed for battling? YOU'VE NEVER EDITED THIS ARTICLE. But guess what, according to stats I am the 4th biggest contributor to the article in terms of edits.--MaranoFan (talk) 17:27, 22 April 2016 (UTC)

Edit summary here: . --Floquenbeam (talk) 17:30, 22 April 2016 (UTC)

Request

MaranoFan (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I have realised my mistake of having made a derogatory statement toward Calvin the other day. I am the fourth largest contributor to that article and decided to nominate it for GA. What's more? Cornerstonepicker and User:Lips Are Movin are the largest contributors to that article! and I am in constant interaction with them (and were ll super familiar with the topic). However, using bad words like "fuck" and "shut up" accounts for bullying, and I am strictly against that. About unblocking me, I would like to assure admins that I have understood the mistakes I have been making, I should be unblocked as blocks are preventative not punitive. I didn't even edit ANI and try to add fuel to the fire. I would also like to assure you that I will keep no interaction with Calvin. If he chooses to interact with me, I won't respond, If he doesn't, we'll and good. If admins decide to impose an IBAN between us, I am also okay with that. I am truly sorry for whoever I've hurt. I am also a constructive editor, I have lots of GAs and DYKs recently, even if I don't have a 6-year wiki- history to back me up. Finally, I would like to add that I do have bipolar disorder and haven't taken what I perceive as provocation well. However, y'all will see that that will change as I gain more control. If in the future some discussion gets too heated, expect me to go on a wiki break on my own. One thing I can surely promise is that I keep my promises, and this is a promise. I have also served out full blocks before, and adhered to my IBAN even if that feeling was not mutual. Thank you.--MaranoFan (talk) 06:18, 23 April 2016 (UTC)

Decline reason:

This block seems to be the result of a long history of ongoing disruption between you and Calvin999. I see mutual battleground behaviour and a failure to assume good faith. You say this is in the past but on this very page while blocked you refer to their edits as vandalism. I have no confidence whatsoever that you are ready to disengage. I think the duration of the block is appropriate as it takes time to change habits long held. The duration was long but an indefinite block is likely if it continues. I hope in the future you two can either get along or avoid each other. HighInBC 01:58, 24 April 2016 (UTC)

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Also, I have indicated a request to be mentored by Swarm, so that will likely help too. My GA review of Like I'm Gonna Lose You is her too. Can I please have the above request considered?--MaranoFan (talk) 06:32, 23 April 2016 (UTC)

Using your unblock request to continue arguing about the dispute that got you blocked in the first place is not the route to being unblocked. Please refer to WP:GAB, particularly WP:NOTTHEM. Chase (talk | contributions) 14:48, 23 April 2016 (UTC)

Hey Chase, great to see you're back. Now on topic:The summary for the block states that's it is for a "battle", Now the series of events that lead to that we're a result of provocation. And that is what I describe through my unblock request.--MaranoFan (talk) 14:58, 23 April 2016 (UTC)

MaranoFan, I'm not an administrator, and there any many administrators, each with their own perspective. So I can't definitely say whether your unblock request will be successful; I can say, having observed the results of many unblock requests, in my opinion, it's more likely to fail than succeed. I suggest editing to the following:

I have realised my mistake of having made a derogatory statement toward Calvin the other day. I am the fourth largest contributor to that article and decided to nominate it for GA. What's more? Cornerstonepicker and User:Lips Are Movin are the largest contributors to that article! and I am in constant interaction with them (and were ll super familiar with the topic). However, using bad words like "fuck" and "shut up" accounts for bullying, and I am strictly against that. About unblocking me, I would like to assure admins that I have understood the mistakes I have been making, I should be unblocked as blocks are preventative not punitive. I didn't even edit ANI and try to add fuel to the fire. I would also like to assure you that I will keep no interaction with Calvin. If he chooses to interact with me, I won't respond, If he doesn't, we'll and good. If admins decide to impose an IBAN between us, I am also okay with that. I am truly sorry for whoever I've hurt. I am also a constructive editor, I have lots of GAs and DYKs recently, even if I don't have a 6-year wiki- history to back me up. Finally, I would like to add that I do have bipolar disorder and haven't taken what I perceive as provocation well. However, y'all will see that that will change as I gain more control. If in the future some discussion gets too heated, expect me to go on a wiki break on my own. One thing I can surely promise is that I keep my promises, and this is a promise. I have also served out full blocks before, and adhered to my IBAN even if that feeling was not mutual. Thank you

I am truly to be helpful here; if you feel my suggestions are not helpful to you, I will withdraw from your talk page and leave you alone. NE Ent 15:11, 23 April 2016 (UTC)

No, NE Ent, your suggestions are truly helpful. I am always open to constructive criticism. Thanks for your feedback.--MaranoFan (talk) 15:16, 23 April 2016 (UTC)

• For what it's worth, some more info for reviewing admin. Calvin999 started this particular incident, but MF has been giving as good as they get for a long time. This block was not for saying "fuck off" in isolation; it was because it is part of a continuing pattern over the last few months (years? I don't know, I haven't checked). For example, the Hatfield vs McCoy thing came to my attention in the first place when MF was very blatantly trying to goad Winkelvi a few weeks ago, related to the GA nom of Billy the Kid. Other times, it's been WV and others poking MF. MF is not an innocent party, and they are not the only guilty party. So this is not a matter of MF getting tricked into something this one time and getting a one month block. It was made crystal clear in the last ANI thread (one of about a dozen this year) that the community is sick to death of all of this. I won't support or oppose another admin modifying this block, but that's the reason it's a month long. --Floquenbeam (talk) 16:22, 23 April 2016 (UTC)

@Floquenbeam: Again, preventative not punitive. The key thing to observe is that I have been out of the drama for like one whole month. I have understood my mistakes, and won't be repeating them again. Also please don't mention parties I'm not allowed to interact with, the IBAN has worked out very well and we don't have issues anymore.--MaranoFan (talk) 16:26, 23 April 2016 (UTC)

I'm leaving a message for the reviewing admin, not you, so there is no problem mentioning another editor. You don't need to discuss them, they aren't welcome to comment here, etc. --Floquenbeam (talk) 16:30, 23 April 2016 (UTC)

Floq, Calvin is still mentioning me on his talk page, even after saying he would stop stalking me.--MaranoFan (talk) 16:33, 23 April 2016 (UTC)

Accusing others of stalking you is not proving that you and Calvin aren't going to stop disrupting the project. That's why you're blocked right now. This is preventative. Chase (talk | contributions) 16:50, 23 April 2016 (UTC)

Again, the issues are with the same one or two users. We all work well alone for what it's worth. Calvin has a lot of good articles and I was just starting to make progress. These individual blocks won't help anything. You know that they will keep vandalising my good article nominations. What is needed here is IBANs, yes. Please let's just place an Iban between us and get on with our lives. I have two good articles pending, and even he has many. The whole notion of this block is ridiculous. Your reasoning was WP:Battle. But if we have a battle, just stop the battle by pulling us away from each other, not by pulling off two constr uctive editors off-wiki altogether. Other viable options are a ANI ban for him (not for me as I've stopped going there a long time ago).--MaranoFan (talk) 16:51, 23 April 2016 (UTC)

You don't seem to get it, MaranoFan. You have to stop talking about Calvin and watching his editing. Don't wait for an admin to impose an IBan. Just focus on how this block was prompted by your own behavior. You shouldn't be mentioning Calvin or other editors at all if you want to be unblocked. Liz 17:00, 23 April 2016 (UTC)

Echoing Liz here. Behavior like this – trying to communicate/instigate matters with Calvin while blocked – demonstrates that you're not willing to play nice or improve on the behavior that got you blocked. I recommend that admins revoke talk page editing rights if this continues. Chase (talk | contributions) 17:02, 23 April 2016 (UTC)

Not necessarily; it's possible that MaranoFan is willing to "play nice," as you say, and improve their behavior but lacks the skill set to do so without more specific guidance. Given multiple possibilities (not willing / needs assistance), our WP:AGF policy says we select the latter. NE Ent 22:47, 23 April 2016 (UTC)

Liz's advice is spot on; unwatching other's page is a good first step. NE Ent 22:47, 23 April 2016 (UTC)

@NE Ent: OK, I am not watching their contribs anymore. If it is possible, I would like someone to WP:MENTOR me and help me make rational decisions even when I lose my temper a bit. I hope one of you wishes to take this responsibility. Thanks.--MaranoFan (talk) 06:42, 24 April 2016 (UTC)

My real life commitments are such that the time I have available for wiki activities varies greatly and unexpectedly; for that reason I'm unable to take on commitments such as mentoring. NE Ent 13:02, 24 April 2016 (UTC)

No problem, I have applied for adoption anyways. Thanks for considering. ;)--MaranoFan (talk) 13:09, 24 April 2016 (UTC)

Do you want me to adopt you? Seven years of experience and 150k+ edits should qualify me for knowing the ropes. JAGUAR  14:01, 24 April 2016 (UTC)

Sure, Jaggery. :D-MaranoFan (talk) 16:26, 24 April 2016 (UTC)

Sounds good! If you're OK with it, then I'll gladly accept. JAGUAR  17:21, 24 April 2016 (UTC)

DYK for Dear Future Husband

On 24 April 2016, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Dear Future Husband, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Meghan Trainor considered "Dear Future Husband" to be one of the strongest tracks on Title? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Dear Future Husband. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Dear Future Husband), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Worm(talk) 09:08, 24 April 2016 (UTC)

Request

MaranoFan (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Notes:

• In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
• Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.

If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "blocking administrator" with the name of the blocking admin:

{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2=I am ready to fully disengage with users I have had conflicts before with. I promise to stop replying to any comment they make about me. I can be trusted to hold my promises. While in the previous unblock request, I was still referencing them. I want to make this one about my actions. I will be exercising more good faith in my post-block future. I have fully realised the part I played in past conflicts, and yes there was a recurring pattern. But I do have bipolar disorder, and hope for a little more lenience from other users. I will always read up on guidelines before making any sort of nominations. I was wrong and disruptive to offend the other party. But I will keep a cool and calm attitude from now on. It will be really nice to overcome these disputes, and stop engaging in battles. And I think the mentorship I am gonna be receiving is going to start a new chapter in my wiki-life. I promise to fully let go of my past ] mentality. Yes, I have made mistakes in the past. And I think bringing a change in myself than going on correcting others is the first step in the right direction. That is what I am going to be doing from now.--] (]) 12:56, 24 April 2016 (UTC) |3 = ~~~~}}

If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}} with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.

{{unblock reviewed |1=I am ready to fully disengage with users I have had conflicts before with. I promise to stop replying to any comment they make about me. I can be trusted to hold my promises. While in the previous unblock request, I was still referencing them. I want to make this one about my actions. I will be exercising more good faith in my post-block future. I have fully realised the part I played in past conflicts, and yes there was a recurring pattern. But I do have bipolar disorder, and hope for a little more lenience from other users. I will always read up on guidelines before making any sort of nominations. I was wrong and disruptive to offend the other party. But I will keep a cool and calm attitude from now on. It will be really nice to overcome these disputes, and stop engaging in battles. And I think the mentorship I am gonna be receiving is going to start a new chapter in my wiki-life. I promise to fully let go of my past ] mentality. Yes, I have made mistakes in the past. And I think bringing a change in myself than going on correcting others is the first step in the right direction. That is what I am going to be doing from now.--] (]) 12:56, 24 April 2016 (UTC) |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}

If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here with your rationale:

{{unblock reviewed |1=I am ready to fully disengage with users I have had conflicts before with. I promise to stop replying to any comment they make about me. I can be trusted to hold my promises. While in the previous unblock request, I was still referencing them. I want to make this one about my actions. I will be exercising more good faith in my post-block future. I have fully realised the part I played in past conflicts, and yes there was a recurring pattern. But I do have bipolar disorder, and hope for a little more lenience from other users. I will always read up on guidelines before making any sort of nominations. I was wrong and disruptive to offend the other party. But I will keep a cool and calm attitude from now on. It will be really nice to overcome these disputes, and stop engaging in battles. And I think the mentorship I am gonna be receiving is going to start a new chapter in my wiki-life. I promise to fully let go of my past ] mentality. Yes, I have made mistakes in the past. And I think bringing a change in myself than going on correcting others is the first step in the right direction. That is what I am going to be doing from now.--] (]) 12:56, 24 April 2016 (UTC) |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}

I have no objection if another admin comes to a different determination than myself. HighInBC 17:45, 24 April 2016 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Like I'm Gonna Lose You

The article Like I'm Gonna Lose You you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Like I'm Gonna Lose You for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Jaguar -- Jaguar (talk) 14:40, 24 April 2016 (UTC)

@Cornerstonepicker: As a fellow WikiProject Meghan Trainor member and the largest contributor to the LIGLY article, can you possibly pick up this review in my absence. Thank you in advance.-MaranoFan (talk) 16:24, 24 April 2016 (UTC)

• Requests for unblock