| Revision as of 06:07, 26 April 2016 editMayasutra (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users2,392 edits re →April 2016← Previous edit | Revision as of 08:39, 26 April 2016 edit undoKautilya3 (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers86,726 edits →Need to calm down: new sectionNext edit → | ||
| Line 26: | Line 26: | ||
| :::It is obvious you have drawn lines and function on those without seeing reason. You should have asked Sarah Welch to take back claims on threatening; as mentioned above. Have . Let the admin take a call. BTW, am glad am not active on wiki or contributing to ]. If such is the way reasoning functions here, its not worth it. Thanks. --] (]) 06:07, 26 April 2016 (UTC)Mayasutra | :::It is obvious you have drawn lines and function on those without seeing reason. You should have asked Sarah Welch to take back claims on threatening; as mentioned above. Have . Let the admin take a call. BTW, am glad am not active on wiki or contributing to ]. If such is the way reasoning functions here, its not worth it. Thanks. --] (]) 06:07, 26 April 2016 (UTC)Mayasutra | ||
| == Need to calm down == | |||
| Hi Mayasutra, It seems that you are quite upset, and you probably need to take short break from this to calm down and take it easy. On the issue of making personal comments on others: | |||
| * It should never be done on article talk pages, even though I would admit that I let a word a slip here or there. If you do so, you can always go back and strike off the comments for having done it in the heat of the moment. | |||
| * You can complain to editors on their talk pages, on the talk pages of admins or on forums like ], but you should do so only with evidence, and be polite at all times. | |||
| Ms Sarah Welch is an extremely talented Wikipedian, both in terms of her scholarship and her ability to write beautifully. She has numerous barnstars and GA articles to her credit. If you step back a little, you will learn to appreciate her editing as well as to enjoy it. Cheers, ] (]) 08:39, 26 April 2016 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 08:39, 26 April 2016
 Archives |
|
This page has archives. Sections older than 14 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 1 section is present. |
|
Archives |
|
This page has archives. Sections older than 14 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 1 section is present. |
Inappropriate comments, WP:CIVIL policy of wikipedia
@Mayasutra: This] is inappropriate behavior on wikipedia. Calling someone "childish" and making snarky personal attacks on article talk pages is not constructive. Please review WP:TPNO as well as WP:CIVIL, and respect community agreed guidelines on civility and proper use of article talk pages. Repeat of such behavior may invite an administrative review of your editing privileges. Ms Sarah Welch (talk) 18:21, 23 April 2016 (UTC)
- Please follow what you preach. You cannot extrapolate as you wish. I could do the same for your insulting remarks on claiming to threaten. Take care of your behavior and stick to the topic. It is obvious you are getting personal because you know Gonda is wrong in claiming mA in Sanskrit is mother and linking the root ma to maya without basis.--Mayasutra (talk) 18:29, 23 April 2016 (UTC)Mayasutra
April 2016
Please do not attack other editors, as you did at Talk:Maya (illusion). Comment on content, not on contributors. Personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Please stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. Thank you. RexxS (talk) 16:05, 24 April 2016 (UTC)
- If that be the case, kindly ask Ms.Sarah Welch not to get personal; for ex: with claims on threatening, which is plain childish, silly, and serves no purpose. Thanks. --Mayasutra (talk) 13:37, 25 April 2016 (UTC)Mayasutra
- I see that you have now directly accused her of POV-pushing. That is unacceptable and I'll ask you to remove that personal attack immediately. --RexxS (talk) 20:45, 25 April 2016 (UTC)
- It is obvious you have drawn lines and function on those without seeing reason. You should have asked Sarah Welch to take back claims on threatening; as mentioned above. Have explained to SpacemanSpiff. Let the admin take a call. BTW, am glad am not active on wiki or contributing to Wiki Project Med Foundation. If such is the way reasoning functions here, its not worth it. Thanks. --Mayasutra (talk) 06:07, 26 April 2016 (UTC)Mayasutra
Need to calm down
Hi Mayasutra, It seems that you are quite upset, and you probably need to take short break from this to calm down and take it easy. On the issue of making personal comments on others:
- It should never be done on article talk pages, even though I would admit that I let a word a slip here or there. If you do so, you can always go back and strike off the comments for having done it in the heat of the moment.
- You can complain to editors on their talk pages, on the talk pages of admins or on forums like WP:ANI, but you should do so only with evidence, and be polite at all times.
Ms Sarah Welch is an extremely talented Wikipedian, both in terms of her scholarship and her ability to write beautifully. She has numerous barnstars and GA articles to her credit. If you step back a little, you will learn to appreciate her editing as well as to enjoy it. Cheers, Kautilya3 (talk) 08:39, 26 April 2016 (UTC)