| Revision as of 23:31, 4 May 2016 editBellerophon5685 (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users134,895 edits →Misplaced Pages:WikiProject Council/Proposals/Encyclopedias and/or Reference Works← Previous edit |
Revision as of 02:37, 7 May 2016 edit undoLowercase sigmabot III (talk | contribs)Bots, Template editors2,312,032 editsm Archiving 2 discussion(s) to User talk:Malik Shabazz/Archive 59) (botNext edit → |
| Line 22: |
Line 22: |
|
|editbox=no |
|
|editbox=no |
|
}}__FORCETOC__ |
|
}}__FORCETOC__ |
|
|
|
|
== A treat for some of my talk page stalkers == |
|
|
|
|
|
] |
|
|
In particular, {{ping|Cullen328|Arxiloxos|Carptrash|DoctorJoeE|Softlavender}}, who took part last year in the conversation I refer to below. |
|
|
|
|
|
Two weeks ago, I found the photo on the left on Commons and added it to ] and ]. Earlier today, an unrelated search sent me to my talk page archives, where I came across ] we had about the same picture, which had to linked to because it wasn't free. Yet. {{=)}} — ] <sup>]</sup>/<sub>]</sub> 21:25, 30 April 2016 (UTC) |
|
|
{{clear}} |
|
|
|
|
|
::Nice. Love it. Love their expressions. Thanks for sharing this! ] (]) 04:04, 1 May 2016 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
:::Especially Ali's. I always wondered why that particular photo wasn't free, since it was never published, i.e. not one of the ones used in the 1964 ''Life'' Magazine story. But now it's a moot point. Thanks for the memories. ] ]/] 06:11, 1 May 2016 (UTC) |
|
|
{{external media |float=right |width=200px|image1=]] }} |
|
|
::::But Malcolm X's picture still has not shown up? Oh yes, happy May Day. ] (]) 15:40, 1 May 2016 (UTC) |
|
|
PS. I also found the statement that ,"Diminutive in size but gigantic in stature, ] was a genuine architect of ]," but (rare for me) decided to go with the "less is more" dictum and not add it to that article. If you forget the discussion, that's probably a good thing. ] (]) 16:19, 1 May 2016 (UTC) |
|
|
:::::I am delighted to see this photo here on Misplaced Pages and on Commons. Are we sure that {{U|EPHouston}} is actually the photographer ] and authorized to license the photos as his "own work"? ] ] 18:12, 1 May 2016 (UTC) |
|
|
::::::No one can know for sure, but judging by ], it certainly looks like somebody close to ], who took the photo. — ] <sup>]</sup>/<sub>]</sub> 18:22, 1 May 2016 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
== RE: ] == |
|
|
|
|
|
The edits I introduced were not an addition, but a deletion, so I could not have introduced inaccurate data through them. They were specifically deletion of inaccurate data. |
|
|
|
|
|
The page purports that there is a "Conspiracy Theory" about political correctness that proponents call "Cultural Marxism." But for a conspiracy to exist, there has to be both conspirators and something to hide - but political correctness is a very open movement, as was Critical Theory. No such conspiracy theory exists, but critics of the ones who associate the two have been called "conspiracy theorists" merely for pointing out the philosophical similarities. |
|
|
|
|
|
It is simply the observation that political correctness and Critical Theory share extremely similar philosophical roots. That's not a conspiracy theory. That's a run-of-the-mill sociological theory. No one has suggested that academics from Frankfurt sat in dark rooms plotting how to ruin Western culture - Horkheimer, Gramsci and the rest were quite open about their theories; they published them. |
|
|
|
|
|
http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/critical-theory/ |
|
|
|
|
|
http://www.heathwoodpress.com/max-horkheimer-and-the-definition-of-critical-theory-today/ |
|
|
|
|
|
https://books.google.com/books?hl=en&lr=&id=SCiPAgAAQBAJ&oi=fnd&pg=PA27&dq=critical+theory+gramsci&ots=f1uMK2EJRZ&sig=c4GcOwGBfJNPtPDwjjwMzIgvAJU#v=onepage&q=critical%20theory%20gramsci&f=false |
|
|
|
|
|
http://www.iep.utm.edu/frankfur/ |
|
|
|
|
|
http://www.academia.org/the-origins-of-political-correctness/ |
|
|
|
|
|
Let's be clear: drawing connections between two philosophical social movements based upon the similarity of their tenets is not irrational or unacademic. Many academics have pointed out these similarities. To call it a "conspiracy theory" rather than the mere philosophical observation that it is is highly inaccurate. |
|
|
|
|
|
At the very least, it is extremely subjective, which Misplaced Pages discourages. |
|
|
|
|
|
] (]) 03:11, 1 May 2016 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
:Assuming that you made your edits from ], you're mistaken. introduced inaccuracies because the section's sources didn't change (except for one source that you deleted), but you completely changed the meaning of the paragraph—and you changed a link from ] to the nonexistent ]. |
|
|
:I have no interest in debating the matter with you. If you have nothing better to do with your time, you can post a message at ]. But before you do, I recommend reading ], ] (and its archives), and ] (and its archives), because nobody wants to listen to an editor trot out the same stale arguments that have repeatedly refuted in the past. — ] <sup>]</sup>/<sub>]</sub> 03:57, 1 May 2016 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
== ''The Signpost'': 2 May 2016 == |
|
== ''The Signpost'': 2 May 2016 == |
