| Revision as of 06:26, 19 August 2006 edit24.72.93.34 (talk)No edit summary← Previous edit | Revision as of 16:35, 26 August 2006 edit undoMikekev58 (talk | contribs)22 editsNo edit summaryNext edit → | ||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| By taking the policies on ] seriously. Half of the article should be deleted immediately, as it is all unsourced material. As a start, I would recommend {{tl|fact}}-tagging '''all''' unsourced claims ] 12:44, 15 August 2006 (UTC) | By taking the policies on ] seriously. Half of the article should be deleted immediately, as it is all unsourced material. As a start, I would recommend {{tl|fact}}-tagging '''all''' unsourced claims ] 12:44, 15 August 2006 (UTC) | ||
| Forgive me if I missed this, but in reading the account of the 2000 election I did not notice a reference to Al Gore's having won the popular vote, nor any refernce to the controversy regarding Sandra Day O'Connor's alleged reaction to the early call of Florida for Gore, which if true revealed her bias and was grounds for recusing herself. Thanks | |||
Revision as of 16:35, 26 August 2006
By taking the policies on WP:BLP seriously. Half of the article should be deleted immediately, as it is all unsourced material. As a start, I would recommend {{fact}}-tagging all unsourced claims HJ 12:44, 15 August 2006 (UTC)
Forgive me if I missed this, but in reading the account of the 2000 election I did not notice a reference to Al Gore's having won the popular vote, nor any refernce to the controversy regarding Sandra Day O'Connor's alleged reaction to the early call of Florida for Gore, which if true revealed her bias and was grounds for recusing herself. Thanks