Misplaced Pages

Just war theory: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 18:51, 5 March 2003 editSnoyes (talk | contribs)12,299 editsm formatting← Previous edit Revision as of 19:49, 5 March 2003 edit undo128.193.88.80 (talk) My attempt to clearly divide "Jus Ad Bellem" from "Jus In Bello".Next edit →
Line 1: Line 1:
A '''just war''' is a ] which is ethically or legally permissible according to a set of rules. The rules applied may be universal ], ] principles, or formal codes such as ]. The rules may cover the ] for the war (]) or conduct of the participants relative to combatants and more particularly non-combatants. A '''just war''' is a ] which is permissible according to a set of moral or legal rules. The rules applied may be ], ], or formal (such as ]). The rules clasically cover the justification for the war (]) and the conduct of the participants in the war (]).


Just war theory has ancient roots. ] discussed this idea and its applications. Just war theory has ancient roots. ] discussed this idea and its applications. ] and ] later codified a set of rules for a just war, which today still encompass the points commonly debated.


In modern language, these rules hold that to be just, the following must be true prior to the use of force:
] and ] codified a set of rules for a just war, which remains frequently referred to, albeit in an updated form. Few warriors nowadays are troubled by the idea of ] or by fighting on ] in particular. In the updated view, a just war requires that:


*War must only be fought for a just cause. Self-defense against an armed attack is one example that is considered just cause.
*All non-violent options must be exhausted before the use of force
*War is waged by a legitimate ] *War must only be waged under legitimate ]. The sovereign power of the state is usually considered to be legitimate authority.
*War only be fought to redress a wrong suffered. For example, self-defense against an armed attack is always considered to be a just cause *War must only be made with the right intention. Correcting a suffered wrong is considered a right intention, while aggrandizement is not.
*War be waged with a reasonable chance of success. It is considered unjust to meaninglessly waste human life and economic resources if defeat is unavoidable.
*The sole objective is to redress the wrong
*War can only be waged as a last resort. War is not just until all realistic options which were likely to right the wrong have been pursued.
*War be waged with a reasonable chance of success

*The ultimate goal be the re-establishment of peace. More specifically, the ] established after the war must be preferable to the peace that would have prevailed if the war had not been fought.
Once war has begun, just war theory also directs how combatants are to act:
*The ] of the war must be proportional to the wrong endured

*Every effort be taken to avoid killing ]
*The force used must be proportional to the wrong endured.
*The acts of war should be directed towards the inflictors of the wrong, and not towards ] caught in circumstances they did not create.


Actions specifically forbidden by the just war doctrine are: Actions specifically forbidden by the just war doctrine are:
Line 18: Line 20:
*Material gains as a justification for war. *Material gains as a justification for war.
*Torture, either of combatants or of non-combatants. *Torture, either of combatants or of non-combatants.
*Targeting or killing of civilians.


The doctrine of ] employed by ] would include permitting ] tactics and ] amongst others. The doctrine of ] employed by ] would include permitting ] tactics and ] amongst others.

Revision as of 19:49, 5 March 2003

A just war is a war which is permissible according to a set of moral or legal rules. The rules applied may be ethical, religious, or formal (such as international law). The rules clasically cover the justification for the war (Jus Ad Bellem) and the conduct of the participants in the war (Jus In Bello).

Just war theory has ancient roots. Cicero discussed this idea and its applications. St. Augustine and Thomas Aquinas later codified a set of rules for a just war, which today still encompass the points commonly debated.

In modern language, these rules hold that to be just, the following must be true prior to the use of force:

  • War must only be fought for a just cause. Self-defense against an armed attack is one example that is considered just cause.
  • War must only be waged under legitimate authority. The sovereign power of the state is usually considered to be legitimate authority.
  • War must only be made with the right intention. Correcting a suffered wrong is considered a right intention, while aggrandizement is not.
  • War be waged with a reasonable chance of success. It is considered unjust to meaninglessly waste human life and economic resources if defeat is unavoidable.
  • War can only be waged as a last resort. War is not just until all realistic options which were likely to right the wrong have been pursued.

Once war has begun, just war theory also directs how combatants are to act:

  • The force used must be proportional to the wrong endured.
  • The acts of war should be directed towards the inflictors of the wrong, and not towards civilians caught in circumstances they did not create.

Actions specifically forbidden by the just war doctrine are:

  • Material gains as a justification for war.
  • Torture, either of combatants or of non-combatants.

The doctrine of total war employed by Realpolitik would include permitting scorched earth tactics and torture amongst others.

External links