Misplaced Pages

Revision as of 18:47, 10 June 2016

Fungi C‑class Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Fungi, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Fungi on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FungiWikipedia:WikiProject FungiTemplate:WikiProject FungiFungi C This article has been rated as C-class on Misplaced Pages's content assessment scale. Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Edible

the article claims this mushroom is both edible (right at the beginning) and inedible (in the infobox and as a category). I understand it is actually edible but not real tasty, but I think that still classifies it as edible. xschm (talk) 05:45, 20 April 2010 (UTC)

I moved the following *NOTE* (unsigned from IP address 74.46.218.146) from the article to here on the talk page. It would seem to agree with the above comment, so I placed it under this section. Hamamelis (talk) 14:37, 15 May 2010 (UTC)

" *NOTE* Please change that it is inedible from the category. Inedible means it is poisonous or un-digestible. This mushroom can be eaten. "

---

File:Polyporus squamosus Molter.jpg to appear as POTD soon

Hello! This is a note to let the editors of this article know that File:Polyporus squamosus Molter.jpg will be appearing as picture of the day on May 30, 2010. You can view and edit the POTD blurb at Template:POTD/2010-05-30. If this article needs any attention or maintenance, it would be preferable if that could be done before its appearance on the Main Page so Misplaced Pages doesn't look bad. :) Thanks! howcheng {chat} 16:35, 28 May 2010 (UTC)

New name

Cerioporus squamosus has not yet been published AND accepted by two or more scientific journals. (he minimum that is needed to officially change the name.) The classification should remain Polypous squamosus until the 2016 reclassification is agreed upon or published in more than one official source. (mycobank is NOT an official source). The 4th citation takes people back to the name polyporus and does not show adequate sources for the name to change and is therefore incorrect.

Unless proper information can be provided this page should revert to "polyporus squamosus"

It should not that IF Cerioporus is agreed on as a legitimate name that the new classification does not exist in any mushroom books or identification guides so just changing the name without adding information as to why after 129 years the name has been changed means that anyone doing additional research will be left confused. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.158.44.227 (talk) 18:45, 10 June 2016 (UTC)bob

• C-Class Fungi articles
• Low-importance Fungi articles
• WikiProject Fungi articles