| Revision as of 14:44, 5 July 2016 editOien3004 (talk | contribs)2 edits →New Bureaucrat: new section← Previous edit | Revision as of 14:49, 5 July 2016 edit undoElockid (talk | contribs)42,430 editsm Reverted edits by Oien3004 (talk) to last version by DwellerNext edit → | ||
| Line 41: | Line 41: | ||
| I would welcome feedback or a review of the article to see if it still meets ] and whether it should be retained or delisted as a Good article. I would also welcome any feedback you'd be willing to share. Thank you and happy editing. ] (]) 07:53, 27 June 2016 (UTC) | I would welcome feedback or a review of the article to see if it still meets ] and whether it should be retained or delisted as a Good article. I would also welcome any feedback you'd be willing to share. Thank you and happy editing. ] (]) 07:53, 27 June 2016 (UTC) | ||
| :Hi. If I understand you rightly, you're looking for help with assessing whether an article meets GA requirements? I'm afraid I have no expertise at all in GA. You'd be better off finding someone with a bunch of GA nominations to their name? --] (]) <small>Become ]</small> 09:01, 27 June 2016 (UTC) | :Hi. If I understand you rightly, you're looking for help with assessing whether an article meets GA requirements? I'm afraid I have no expertise at all in GA. You'd be better off finding someone with a bunch of GA nominations to their name? --] (]) <small>Become ]</small> 09:01, 27 June 2016 (UTC) | ||
| == New Bureaucrat == | |||
| Click ] and become a bureaucrat only. ] (]) 14:44, 5 July 2016 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 14:49, 5 July 2016
 Archives |
 |
|---|
| 24 December 2024 |
|
.jpg) | Operation Alf Ramsey This editor will not rest until Alf Ramsey is a FA |
Errol Crossan
Done, thanks for spotting it! GiantSnowman 16:41, 4 May 2016 (UTC)
Crossan
You're welcome. But if one momentary loss of concentration really constitutes inadequacy, I think we all qualify... cheers, Struway2 (talk) 14:52, 5 May 2016 (UTC)
Ramsey
Hey dude, can we reinvigorate the Ramsey push? I have a few days to spare while I'm on paternity leave so I might well be able to help a bit more than I have. Even taking it to FAC for review and criticism may be helpful? The Rambling Man (talk) 08:48, 24 May 2016 (UTC)
- I'd absolutely love to, but my computer time is very very limited at the moment. --Dweller (talk) Become old fashioned! 21:43, 24 May 2016 (UTC)
- Oi, The Rambling Man! Put down those nappies and get editing! --Dweller (talk) Become old fashioned! 09:00, 2 June 2016 (UTC)
Daemonic Kangaroo
Thanks for the email, and I am flattered by your comments. If you want to see a reason why I don't wish to remain here, just see the message above yours on the Daemonic Kangaroo talk page. WP has too many pedants who know all the "rules" and get orgasmic when they enforce them. I keep an eye on Southampton FC players and still revert vandalism, but don't want to come back on a regular basis. 92.26.162.36 (talk) 16:46, 1 June 2016 (UTC) (formerly Daemonic Kangaroo)
- I understand your feelings. Feel free to contribute to Ramsey (as you just did!) whenever and in whatever guise you like. We're happy and lucky to have you. And you'll find the chaps working on Ramsey (there's only a few of us) to be pretty clued-up but also collegiate. --Dweller (talk) Become old fashioned! 09:51, 3 June 2016 (UTC)
Br. English
Dweller, as a Brit, perhaps you could help Corinne and I understand British-English practice regarding punctuation outside quotation marks. We're having a side-discussion about it here. Thanks! Sca (talk) 22:17, 7 June 2016 (UTC)
GAR input sought
Hi, I followed here from Misplaced Pages:WikiProject Quality Article Improvement and I am reaching out for an opinion; as the member of the project I hope could provide input on the topics of sourcing, neutrality, extraordinary claims, and level of detail in the articles, as well as general Misplaced Pages policies.
It has been suggested to me by editor Coretheapple in the Discussion area of a current GA reassessment that the review be brought to the attention of a wider audience. The issues above are included in the review, so I hope there's enough of a cross-functional applicability. The article in question is Hyacinth Graf Strachwitz; no specialist knowledge is required to be able to contributed to the GAR.
I would welcome feedback or a review of the article to see if it still meets Misplaced Pages:Good article criteria and whether it should be retained or delisted as a Good article. I would also welcome any feedback you'd be willing to share. Thank you and happy editing. K.e.coffman (talk) 07:53, 27 June 2016 (UTC)
- Hi. If I understand you rightly, you're looking for help with assessing whether an article meets GA requirements? I'm afraid I have no expertise at all in GA. You'd be better off finding someone with a bunch of GA nominations to their name? --Dweller (talk) Become old fashioned! 09:01, 27 June 2016 (UTC)