| Revision as of 23:07, 21 July 2016 editToddst1 (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, IP block exemptions, New page reviewers, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers, Template editors137,759 edits →Quantico page: :If this is where the discussion is taking place, you cannot unilaterally exclude me.← Previous edit | Revision as of 23:09, 21 July 2016 edit undoAlex 21 (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Page movers, File movers, Pending changes reviewers, Template editors140,742 edits Reverted 1 edit by Toddst1 (talk): You were warned. Wait for the opinion of other editors before replying. (TW)Next edit → | ||
| Line 14: | Line 14: | ||
| ::::You do not have consensus for your revert. at least 3 editors have now objected to it. Please stop reverting. ] <small>(])</small> 20:21, 21 July 2016 (UTC) | ::::You do not have consensus for your revert. at least 3 editors have now objected to it. Please stop reverting. ] <small>(])</small> 20:21, 21 July 2016 (UTC) | ||
| {{od|::::}} I know that I have a couple of talk page stalkers that I've worked closely with at ] and ], editors that actually know what they're talking about - would they like to add a few words? I will be listing this discussion for further input, to gain the opinion of more experience editors. Any further additions from {{u|Toddst1}} at this point will be reverted. ]<sup>]</sup> 22:54, 21 July 2016 (UTC) | {{od|::::}} I know that I have a couple of talk page stalkers that I've worked closely with at ] and ], editors that actually know what they're talking about - would they like to add a few words? I will be listing this discussion for further input, to gain the opinion of more experience editors. Any further additions from {{u|Toddst1}} at this point will be reverted. ]<sup>]</sup> 22:54, 21 July 2016 (UTC) | ||
| :If this is where the discussion is taking place, you cannot unilaterally exclude me. If you don't want me posting here, let's move it to the article talk page. ] <small>(])</small> 23:07, 21 July 2016 (UTC) | |||
| == ] == | == ] == | ||
Revision as of 23:09, 21 July 2016
Home Talk Userboxes Scripts Sandbox 1 | 2 | DW | Module: / Sandbox TV Shows Notes Contributions Subpages Uploads
 Archives |
|
no archives yet (create) |
|
Quantico page
I was the one that changed the pages for Quantico recently. I had a look at other Misplaced Pages pages and I saw that the cast tables were presented in a manner that made them easier to read. I did not know that cast tables were deprecated. Could you please refer me to the Misplaced Pages guidelines that corroborates your statement? If you can, that would be much appreciated. Also, I sincerely apologize for causing any issues on your side. I just wanted to get clarification on why the current page is protected. Toddst1 reverted your edits previously under the guise of 'good faith' and my response to you should be evidence that I have not committed 'vandalism' when I wanted to contribute my efforts to help increase the visibility of the page. Please, if you have any concerns about what I said above, let me know as I would be happy to hear them out. Thank you. Elainasla (talk) 04:37, 20 July 2016 (UTC)
- @Elainasla: These cast tables have become deprecated per many and multiple discussions at MOS:TV and WT:TV, the discussions of which are archived in the archives of the respective talk pages, and the tables at the pages you've seen should have also been converted. I have posted on Toddst1's talk page, given that his revert was from misunderstanding, as I reverted the editor who removed much of the coding required for List of Quantico episodes, with no reason. Alex|The|Whovian 07:58, 20 July 2016 (UTC)
- Can you point us to the resulting WP:MOS that says they're deprecated? MOS:TVCAST says nothing about tables. As it is, you appear to be WP:edit warring on that page and maybe even WP:OWNing it. Toddst1 (talk) 13:21, 20 July 2016 (UTC)
- Your accusations of WP:EW and WP:OWN will get you nowhere in this discussion, and are falsely thrown about in this case. You will find the answer for the deprecation in the very reply above yours - first sentence, even. Alex|The|Whovian 12:09, 21 July 2016 (UTC)
- Let's be clear then: nothing in MOS:TVCAST that says they're deprecated. Great.
- You do not have consensus for your revert. at least 3 editors have now objected to it. Please stop reverting. Toddst1 (talk) 20:21, 21 July 2016 (UTC)
- Your accusations of WP:EW and WP:OWN will get you nowhere in this discussion, and are falsely thrown about in this case. You will find the answer for the deprecation in the very reply above yours - first sentence, even. Alex|The|Whovian 12:09, 21 July 2016 (UTC)
- Can you point us to the resulting WP:MOS that says they're deprecated? MOS:TVCAST says nothing about tables. As it is, you appear to be WP:edit warring on that page and maybe even WP:OWNing it. Toddst1 (talk) 13:21, 20 July 2016 (UTC)
I know that I have a couple of talk page stalkers that I've worked closely with at MOS:TV and WP:TV, editors that actually know what they're talking about - would they like to add a few words? I will be listing this discussion for further input, to gain the opinion of more experience editors. Any further additions from Toddst1 at this point will be reverted. Alex|The|Whovian 22:54, 21 July 2016 (UTC)
Category:Articles using Template:Series overview with invalid colour combination
Is this category still being used? I can't seem to find it in the code of Module:Series overview. – nyuszika7h (talk) 11:01, 21 July 2016 (UTC)
- @Nyuszika7H: I initially implemented it in {{Series overview/row}}, but then deleted it from there once it didn't work. The category could probably be deleted, given that no text overlays the coloured cells in an overview table, and hence WP:COLOR does not apply, given that there's no colour combinations to be invalid. Alex|The|Whovian 12:08, 21 July 2016 (UTC)