Talk:Safir T-15: Difference between revisions

Browse history interactively ← Previous edit Next edit →Content deleted Content addedVisual WikitextInline

Revision as of 17:28, 22 July 2016 editHerr Gruber (talk \| contribs)Extended confirmed users3,141 edits →Notability ← Previous edit		Revision as of 18:25, 22 July 2016 edit undoHerr Gruber (talk \| contribs)Extended confirmed users3,141 edits →Notability Next edit →
Line 48:		Line 48:
	::*''Misplaced Pages articles cover notable topics—those that have gained sufficiently significant attention by the world at large and over a period of time, and are not outside the scope of Misplaced Pages. We consider evidence from reliable independent sources to gauge this attention. ''		::*''Misplaced Pages articles cover notable topics—those that have gained sufficiently significant attention by the world at large and over a period of time, and are not outside the scope of Misplaced Pages. We consider evidence from reliable independent sources to gauge this attention. ''
	::So we need "reliable independent sources" (note the plural) to show that this weapon is notable. There is only one source, a self-published blog. That's why I added the notability tag. Since you dispute the notability, the best way to resolve this may be to file an AFD request and let the community decide. ] (]) 16:06, 22 July 2016 (UTC)		::So we need "reliable independent sources" (note the plural) to show that this weapon is notable. There is only one source, a self-published blog. That's why I added the notability tag. Since you dispute the notability, the best way to resolve this may be to file an AFD request and let the community decide. ] (]) 16:06, 22 July 2016 (UTC)
	:::Stop pretending you're some wounded angel here, claiming you're not doing what you are doing is accusing me of lacking the pattern recognition skills of a small child. ] (]) 17:28, 22 July 2016 (UTC)		:::Stop pretending you're some wounded angel here, claiming you're not doing what you are doing is accusing me of lacking the pattern recognition skills of a small child. Also, world.guns.ru is not a blog and is well-regarded as a reliable source. ] (]) 17:28, 22 July 2016 (UTC)

Revision as of 18:25, 22 July 2016

This redirect does not require a rating on Misplaced Pages's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Turkey Low‑importance

	Turkey portal This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Turkey, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Turkey and related topics on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.TurkeyWikipedia:WikiProject TurkeyTemplate:WikiProject TurkeyTurkey
Low	This redirect has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Firearms

This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Firearms, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of firearms on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FirearmsWikipedia:WikiProject FirearmsTemplate:WikiProject FirearmsFirearms

Military history: Technology / Weaponry

This redirect is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion not met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	Military science, technology, and theory task force
	Weaponry task force

File:Ar-10.jpg Nominated for Deletion

	An image used in this article, File:Ar-10.jpg, has been nominated for deletion at Wikimedia Commons in the following category: Media without a source as of 25 July 2011 What should I do?
	A discussion will now take place over on Commons about whether to remove the file. If you feel the deletion can be contested then please do so (commons:COM:SPEEDY has further information). Otherwise consider finding a replacement image before deletion occurs. This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 08:31, 25 July 2011 (UTC)

M16A3

The M16A3 does *not* have a railed flat top. It has a fixed carrying handle, just like the M16A2. The only difference between the is that the A2 can shoot in semi-auto or three round bursts, while the A3 shoots in semi or fully auto. M16 (Colt model number 602) - fully automatic, fixed carrying handle, old style fixed stock, no brass deflector or forward assist, older style iron sights, slab sided (no mag release fence), has a triple pronged, "duckbill" flash hider and triangular handguards. M16A1 (Colt model number 602 - fully automatic, fixed carrying handle, old style fixed stock, no brass deflector, has forward assist with teardrop shaped plunger, has older style iron sights, has small "fence" around the mag release button, has "bird cage" flash hider which produces the big star pattern we're used from the movies and triangular handguards M16A2 (Colt model number 645) - several improvements from A1. Burst fire, fixed handle, newer style fixed stock, has brass deflector and forward assist with round plunger. Has newer, adjustable iron sights. Full fence around mag release button. Has similar flash hider to A1, but only the slots on the top are open. Has round handguards and heavier barrel. M16A3 (Colt model number 646) - identical to the A2 except for the different fire modes. M16A4 (Colt model number 945) - identical to the A2 except from the removeable carry handle

--Stickie — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.29.104.251 (talk) 15:05, 3 March 2013 (UTC)

Notability

What makes this weapon notable? I added a notability tag, but it was deleted without comment. The article has few sources. The weapon appears to be yet another AR-15, distinguished only by the use of different materials in some components. I'm going to restore the tag until there's a consensus that the article is about a notable topic, or more sources are added, or an AFD resolves the matter. Felsic2 (talk) 18:37, 21 July 2016 (UTC)

The fact that it's a Turkish AR is fairly notable by itself. Your hatred for all things AR is fairly obvious, maybe you should try editing articles about things you like instead? Herr Gruber (talk) 09:31, 22 July 2016 (UTC)

Please don't cast aspersions like that. It makes for a negative editing environment. And asking me to stop editing this topic is even more directly negative.

The guideline on notability is WP:N. It says:

Misplaced Pages articles cover notable topics—those that have gained sufficiently significant attention by the world at large and over a period of time, and are not outside the scope of Misplaced Pages. We consider evidence from reliable independent sources to gauge this attention.

So we need "reliable independent sources" (note the plural) to show that this weapon is notable. There is only one source, a self-published blog. That's why I added the notability tag. Since you dispute the notability, the best way to resolve this may be to file an AFD request and let the community decide. Felsic2 (talk) 16:06, 22 July 2016 (UTC)

Stop pretending you're some wounded angel here, claiming you're not doing what you are doing is accusing me of lacking the pattern recognition skills of a small child. Also, world.guns.ru is not a blog and is well-regarded as a reliable source. Herr Gruber (talk) 17:28, 22 July 2016 (UTC)

Categories: