| Revision as of 14:01, 9 August 2016 edit206.167.168.128 (talk) →August 2016← Previous edit | Revision as of 15:46, 9 August 2016 edit undoSro23 (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Administrators53,146 edits →August 2016Next edit → | ||
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
| That's cute so basically you allow lies and misleads to be the norm. and then you wonder why wikipedia is not a respected source of information. You will never be considered as a reliable source of information when you choose what pleases only a certain few | That's cute so basically you allow lies and misleads to be the norm. and then you wonder why wikipedia is not a respected source of information. You will never be considered as a reliable source of information when you choose what pleases only a certain few | ||
| :Please undo your recent edits. Otherwise I will have to take it to ]. ] (]) 15:46, 9 August 2016 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 15:46, 9 August 2016
August 2016
Hello, and welcome to Misplaced Pages. You appear to be repeatedly reverting or undoing other editors' contributions. Although this may seem necessary to protect your preferred version of a page, on Misplaced Pages this is known as "edit warring" and is usually seen as obstructing the normal editing process, as it often creates animosity between editors. Instead of reverting, please discuss the situation with the editor(s) involved and try to reach a consensus on the talk page.
If editors continue to revert to their preferred version they are likely to lose editing privileges. This isn't done to punish an editor, but to prevent the disruption caused by edit warring. In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Edit warring on Misplaced Pages is not acceptable in any amount, and violating the three-revert rule is very likely to lead to a loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Sro23 (talk) 13:53, 9 August 2016 (UTC)
That's cute so basically you allow lies and misleads to be the norm. and then you wonder why wikipedia is not a respected source of information. You will never be considered as a reliable source of information when you choose what pleases only a certain few
- Please undo your recent edits. Otherwise I will have to take it to WP:ANI/3RR. Sro23 (talk) 15:46, 9 August 2016 (UTC)