Misplaced Pages

Talk:UNESCO: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 18:49, 9 August 2016 editLembit Staan (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers69,433 edits →Ataturk section← Previous edit Revision as of 19:24, 9 August 2016 edit undoBello5Packo (talk | contribs)20 edits →Ataturk section: RE (for vandal)Next edit →
Line 51: Line 51:


And of course is is very funny that it was commented as "vandalism of Turkish user" :-) by a {{user|Bello5Packo}}, who is 100% same as {{user|Green Table 1025}} and who is strongly advised to learn our policy about ]. ] (]) 18:47, 9 August 2016 (UTC) And of course is is very funny that it was commented as "vandalism of Turkish user" :-) by a {{user|Bello5Packo}}, who is 100% same as {{user|Green Table 1025}} and who is strongly advised to learn our policy about ]. ] (]) 18:47, 9 August 2016 (UTC)

* I say total stupidity. And I suppose you are Turkish user (not Polish) ] (]) 19:23, 9 August 2016 (UTC)

Revision as of 19:24, 9 August 2016

Template:Vital article

WikiProject iconInternational relations: United Nations C‑class Top‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject International relations, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of International relations on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.International relationsWikipedia:WikiProject International relationsTemplate:WikiProject International relationsInternational relations
CThis article has been rated as C-class on Misplaced Pages's content assessment scale.
TopThis article has been rated as Top-importance on the project's importance scale.
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by WikiProject United Nations.

A fact from this article was featured on Misplaced Pages's Main Page in the On this day section on November 16, 2015.
Archiving icon
Archives

1


This page has archives. Sections older than 90 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 3 sections are present.

Incorporation request

could someone please incorporate this news item into this article? :) Kingturtle 19:19 11 Jun 2003 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on UNESCO. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—Talk to my owner:Online 07:47, 27 January 2016 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on UNESCO. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—Talk to my owner:Online 01:21, 2 March 2016 (UTC)

Ataturk section

I removed this section for several reasons:

  • Irrelevant to the section "Controversy": there is no controversy
  • It is original research: there is no ref cited which comments about why Ataturk was not honored.
  • The rest is talk about Turkish genocides, which have to relation to UNESCO.

And of course is is very funny that it was commented as "vandalism of Turkish user" :-) by a Bello5Packo (talk · contribs), who is 100% same as Green Table 1025 (talk · contribs) and who is strongly advised to learn our policy about WP:Sock puppetry. Staszek Lem (talk) 18:47, 9 August 2016 (UTC)

Categories: