Revision as of 20:06, 9 August 2016 editEdgar181 (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users196,325 editsNo edit summary← Previous edit | Revision as of 20:11, 9 August 2016 edit undoElectricburst1996 (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users8,562 edits →User-reportedNext edit → | ||
Line 27: | Line 27: | ||
:::Electricburst my defense under the false edit summary claim of "Only admins get to decide whether or not it is really vandalism." He has since with fuller explanation with no reason. ] (]) 20:03, 9 August 2016 (UTC) | :::Electricburst my defense under the false edit summary claim of "Only admins get to decide whether or not it is really vandalism." He has since with fuller explanation with no reason. ] (]) 20:03, 9 August 2016 (UTC) | ||
::{{aiv|c}} -- ] (]) 20:06, 9 August 2016 (UTC) | ::{{aiv|c}} -- ] (]) 20:06, 9 August 2016 (UTC) | ||
:::{{ping|Edgar181}} Yeah, with this user, nothing gets accomplished. |
Revision as of 20:11, 9 August 2016
"WP:RVAN" redirects here. For information on how to respond to vandalism, see Misplaced Pages:Vandalism § How to respond to vandalism.Noticeboards | |
---|---|
Misplaced Pages's centralized discussion, request, and help venues. For a listing of ongoing discussions and current requests, see the dashboard. For a related set of forums which do not function as noticeboards see formal review processes. | |
General | |
Articles, content | |
Page handling | |
User conduct | |
Other | |
Category:Misplaced Pages noticeboards |
Before reporting, read the spam and vandalism pages, as well as the AIV guide. To submit, edit this page and follow the instructions at the top of the "User-reported" section. For other issues, file a request for administrator attention.
Important!- The edits of the user must be obvious vandalism or obvious spam.
- Except for egregious cases, the user must have been given enough warning(s).
- The warning(s) must have been given recently and there must be reasonable grounds to believe the user(s) will further disrupt the site in the immediate future.
- If you decide that a report should be filed, place the following template at the bottom of the User-reported section:
* {{Vandal|Example user or IP}} Your concise reason (e.g. vandalised past 4th warning). ~~~~
- Requests for further sanctions against a blocked user (e.g., talk page, e-mail blocks) should be made at Misplaced Pages:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.
- Reports of sockpuppetry should be made at Misplaced Pages:Sockpuppet investigations unless the connection between the accounts is obvious and disruption is recent and ongoing.
- This noticeboard can grow and become backlogged. Stale reports are automatically cleared by MDanielsBot after 4–8 hours with no action.
This page was last updated at 22:11 on 8 January 2025 (UTC). Purge the cache of this page if it is out of date.
Reports
Bot-reported
- 209.7.64.10 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) – Tripped disruption-catching filters five times in the last 5 minutes (details). Report false positive. DatBot (talk) 17:29, 8 January 2025 (UTC)
- Warned user. --Ahecht (TALK
PAGE) 18:02, 8 January 2025 (UTC)
- Warned user. --Ahecht (TALK
- 148.77.46.85 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) – Tripped disruption-catching filters five times in the last 5 minutes (details). Report false positive. DatBot (talk) 18:17, 8 January 2025 (UTC)
- Given final warning. A number of vandalism edits spread over the last few months. Likely same person but AGF, so final warning given. TigerShark (talk) 18:29, 8 January 2025 (UTC)
User-reported
- Spshu (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) – On Newquay (diff):. Unexplained removal of content after final warning. ElectricBurst(Zaps) 19:50, 9 August 2016 (UTC)
- Obvious not vandalism as I removed travel guide type information and an invalid url. Spshu (talk) 19:55, 9 August 2016 (UTC)
- Electricburst removed my defense under the false edit summary claim of "Only admins get to decide whether or not it is really vandalism." He has since reversed my edit with fuller explanation with no reason. Spshu (talk) 20:03, 9 August 2016 (UTC)
- Content dispute. Consider dispute resolution. -- Ed (Edgar181) 20:06, 9 August 2016 (UTC)
- Obvious not vandalism as I removed travel guide type information and an invalid url. Spshu (talk) 19:55, 9 August 2016 (UTC)