| Revision as of 00:08, 14 August 2016 editLongLiveMusic (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users24,446 edits →User Concern: new section← Previous edit | Revision as of 02:56, 14 August 2016 edit undoLowercase sigmabot III (talk | contribs)Bots, Template editors2,304,656 editsm Archiving 2 discussion(s) to User talk:Rjd0060/Archive 12) (botNext edit → | ||
| Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
| }}{{User:Rjd0060/uttop}} | }}{{User:Rjd0060/uttop}} | ||
| == Image == | |||
| Hi, I actually asked in the teahouse where I can go and I was sent to the Admin OTRS page. It has taken 10 months (very recent 7 April 2016) for me to locate the photographer of the image that was originally installed 22 May 2015 and then deleted. (https://commons.wikimedia.org/File:Gary_Kendall.jpg) | |||
| I do not know if there is enough permission here. Three tickets had to be created to hopefully prove permission. I do not know if the form has been sent in by the photographer yet, sometimes I am not notified they have sent them in. Please let me know, I sure would like this settled and over. I also understand that you are back logged in otrs at the moment, I do understand if this cannot be dealt with at present. Thank you ] (]) 13:42, 12 April 2016 (UTC) | |||
| ], ], ] | |||
| :Hello ]. The tickets have been recevived and are awaiting processing. You are free to follow up at ] in the meantime. Note that it could take some time before the permissions are processed and the images tagged. ] (]) 18:47, 12 April 2016 (UTC) | |||
| :Thank you for your reply. ] (]) 23:09, 12 April 2016 (UTC) | |||
| Hi, I just heard from the photographer and he has sent me the ticket number wikipedia sent him. He was confused by the email which is why he did not contact me, he thought permissions was sending him something else so he waited. Please delete the above ticket numbers, this will be the only one needed, as I really do not wish you or the volunteers wasting time when there is such a back log: ]. I am so glad this 10 month search will finally come to an end. Thanks much, appreciated. ] (]) 21:39, 13 April 2016 (UTC) | |||
| :I have merged all the tickets together. The volunteer who processes it should be able to understand the situation. Thank you. ] (]) 00:22, 14 April 2016 (UTC) | |||
| :Thank you] (]) 19:42, 16 April 2016 (UTC) | |||
| == Nomination of ] for deletion == | == Nomination of ] for deletion == | ||
| Line 25: | Line 13: | ||
| The article will be discussed at ] until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines. | The article will be discussed at ] until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines. | ||
| == Baboor Kamme == | |||
| Hi. I saw you deleted the page for Baboor Kamme and mentioned the reason that it has been unsourced for years. I belong to the community and the Misplaced Pages page that was deleted was well-documented. For the proof of the existence of the community, you can refer to '''List of Brahmin Communities : Brahma Samaj''' <ref> www.brahmsamaj.org/list-of-brahmin-communities/</ref>. You can also find some relevant stuff in web searches, such as, '''Open Access Articles''' <ref>research.omicsgroup.org/index.php/Babboor_Kamme</ref> and '''IndiaDivine.org'''<ref> | |||
| www.indiadivine.org/content/topic/1275731-babborkamme-community</ref>, but I don't know whether you expect further citations to review the decision. If the deletion can be reversed, does one need to do some major research to cite further credible sources which can be considered acceptable? ] 04:30, 4 May 2016 (UTC) | |||
| Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.<!-- Template:afd-notice --> –<kbd><small>] ]</small></kbd> 02:02, 20 April 2016 (UTC) | |||
| == Episerver Article Deletion == | == Episerver Article Deletion == | ||
Revision as of 02:56, 14 August 2016
I will usually reply to messages left here on this page so check back for a response.
 Archives
|
Nomination of Bruce Maiman for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Bruce Maiman is suitable for inclusion in Misplaced Pages according to Misplaced Pages's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Bruce Maiman until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Episerver Article Deletion
Hello - The Episerver (EPiServer) -- https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=EPiServer&action=edit&redlink=1 -- page was deleted by you in October 2015. The reason is -- "Expired PROD, concern was: No evidence of notability. Only one reference that might possibly be considered independent, and that is no more than an announcement of a business deal."
I am hoping to have this page restored. There is evidence of notability as one of the top web content management systems and ecommerce platforms, and you will see independent references below, including other Misplaced Pages articles. I work for Episerver and I am happy to update the article with relevant content and proper citations. Is there any way you can reinstate the article or make a recommendation on how I can get it undeleted? I'd appreciate any help you can offer. Thank you in advance. References on the Internet
BRIEF-Clavister announces a deployment of W50 firewalls by Episerve
8 Benefits of Multi-Channel Digital Marketing
An Interview with James Stout, Senior Manager, Technology and Developer Evangelist, Episerver
An epic Episerver Ascend 2015 customer conference
Episerver Releases Digital Experience Cloud Fall 15
References within Misplaced Pages
Undelete Choice Based Credit System Article
I was not active on wikipedia and therefore could not oppose the PROD and it was expired when I returned. I have a lot of evidence to prove it's notability and it's worth of inclusion on Misplaced Pages. Thanks Ryan Assefme (talk) 11:45, 1 June 2016 (UTC)
American Nitrox Divers International
The PROD for this somehow escaped my attention. Although the organisation is not one that I have much sympathy for, it is nevertheless a significant international recreational diver training agency, and should have an encyclopedia article. It should have been tagged as part of Wikiproject Scuba diving and as such should not have been Prodded in the first place, as inclusion in a project should imply that at least some of the project members consider it significant enough to keep. Please undelete so it can be brought up to scratch. Cheers, • • • Peter (Southwood) : 07:08, 5 July 2016 (UTC)
- It has been undeleted by another admin after waiting several weeks for a response. During this time you made no edits so I assumed you were on an indefinite wikibreak. Cheers, • • • Peter (Southwood) : 08:03, 28 July 2016 (UTC)
User Concern
Hello. I wasn't sure who to reach out to so since you are the last administrator that last blocked this person's account I wanted to let you know. I saw that user User:64.183.48.206 has been blocked before and they are adding unsourced information again and the same information is also being added by User:2602:306:BDC5:6DC0:3C88:91E7:1AAA:E1B8. I don't want to get in an edit war with this person so I wanted to let someone know. Thank you. LongLiveMusic (talk) 00:08, 14 August 2016 (UTC)
- "Gartner Names Web Content Management Leaders". CMS Wire. Simpler Media Group, Inc.