Misplaced Pages

User talk:John: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 23:39, 2 September 2006 editJtdirl (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users24,275 editsm →Rankings resource← Previous edit Revision as of 17:52, 3 September 2006 edit undoTheTruth2 (talk | contribs)559 edits MOve on?Next edit →
Line 16: Line 16:


You might be interested in a RM going on at ] (sic). Some individuals moved the page to that ridiculous name (if it stays at that form WP will be a laughing stock!) Feel free to contribute to the debate if you wish. ]]\<sup><font color="blue">]</font></sup> 23:38, 2 September 2006 (UTC) You might be interested in a RM going on at ] (sic). Some individuals moved the page to that ridiculous name (if it stays at that form WP will be a laughing stock!) Feel free to contribute to the debate if you wish. ]]\<sup><font color="blue">]</font></sup> 23:38, 2 September 2006 (UTC)

== MOve on? ==

not until I get an apology for being unfairly blocked] 17:52, 3 September 2006 (UTC)

Revision as of 17:52, 3 September 2006

Thanks, userpage rescued again

Thanks, as usual, for the revert on my userpage. Best, Gwernol 01:18, 1 September 2006 (UTC)

Sorry for taking away your first block. Yes, I enjoyed his insistence on correctly spelling his rather pointed message. Gwernol 01:35, 1 September 2006 (UTC)

Rankings resource

I had previously listed a literary source for world cup rankings but it must have not been considered reputable. There were others in some yearly sports almanacs such as Sports Illustrated but I have not been able to track down some of the older ones. I was hoping the following source would be suitable. http://fifaworldcup.yahoo.com/releases/en/fwc_origin_en.pdf Libro0 18:03, 2 September 2006 (UTC)

My focus was on including the rankings for 1930-1966. These have been userfy(ied) as you suggested. Thank you by the way. User:Libro0/rankings(along with other seldom seen data). Since current rankings would be a valid inclusion because FIFA uses them I don't think discussion is necessary for those. Therefore as a matter of consistency the early ones could be included as well. I think that the respective pages themselves would be suitable for the discussion. I believe on the 1930 and 1934 pages it has already been started. Libro0 18:48, 2 September 2006 (UTC)

You might be interested in a RM going on at talk:Prime minister (sic). Some individuals moved the page to that ridiculous name (if it stays at that form WP will be a laughing stock!) Feel free to contribute to the debate if you wish. FearÉIREANN\ 23:38, 2 September 2006 (UTC)

MOve on?

not until I get an apology for being unfairly blockedTheTruth2 17:52, 3 September 2006 (UTC)