Misplaced Pages

User talk:84.208.99.96: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 04:42, 4 September 2006 editSSS108 (talk | contribs)3,025 editsNo edit summary← Previous edit Revision as of 10:12, 4 September 2006 edit undo84.208.99.96 (talk)No edit summaryNext edit →
Line 6: Line 6:


:For starters, I am not a devotee of Sathya Sai Baba, nor is he my Guru. This is a constant lie perpetuated by ProEdits (Robert Priddy) against me with no proof. The page about Arne Næss contained original research, which is not allowed on Misplaced Pages. ProEdits even called his material ''"original research"'' . It is also important to point out that Robert Priddy (ProEdits) had a slanderous and defamatory link about Sathya Sai Baba on his Misplaced Pages article and used Alan Kazlev as a pawn to remove my link. Robert Priddy (ProEdits) has no less than 3 Anti-Sathya-Sai-Baba sites on the internet and has no less than 6 websites deleted for defamatory content against Sathya Sai Baba. Priddy is obviously oblivious to Misplaced Pages's policies on original research and citing reliable sources. As one can see, ProEdits is highly polarized and is incapable of telling the truth and backing it up with any verfiable sources. He was a former devotee of Sathya Sai Baba for 17/18 years and is now very disgruntled and angry at his former eulogy of Sathya Sai Baba as God Incarnate and the Avatar Of The Age. He even wrote a book about it. ] <sup>]-]</sup> 04:42, 4 September 2006 (UTC) :For starters, I am not a devotee of Sathya Sai Baba, nor is he my Guru. This is a constant lie perpetuated by ProEdits (Robert Priddy) against me with no proof. The page about Arne Næss contained original research, which is not allowed on Misplaced Pages. ProEdits even called his material ''"original research"'' . It is also important to point out that Robert Priddy (ProEdits) had a slanderous and defamatory link about Sathya Sai Baba on his Misplaced Pages article and used Alan Kazlev as a pawn to remove my link. Robert Priddy (ProEdits) has no less than 3 Anti-Sathya-Sai-Baba sites on the internet and has no less than 6 websites deleted for defamatory content against Sathya Sai Baba. Priddy is obviously oblivious to Misplaced Pages's policies on original research and citing reliable sources. As one can see, ProEdits is highly polarized and is incapable of telling the truth and backing it up with any verfiable sources. He was a former devotee of Sathya Sai Baba for 17/18 years and is now very disgruntled and angry at his former eulogy of Sathya Sai Baba as God Incarnate and the Avatar Of The Age. He even wrote a book about it. ] <sup>]-]</sup> 04:42, 4 September 2006 (UTC)


I have not stated that SSS108 is a devotee of Sathya Sai Baba, nor that he is Moreno's guru since he surprisingly declared this himself after some time about 2 years ago. However, the massive diatribes against all critics of Sathya Sai Baba by Gerald Moreno on four websites, several blogs and numerous bulletin boards - totally in defense of this guru -shows enough about Gerald Joe Moreno's obsessive attitudes and total bias. His claim that I have had 6 websites deleted for defamation is not true, simply. There is NO PROOF of this copntrived allegation - and I have never been informed by any web server of having defamed anyone, which would be normal practice, for then I would obviously have reacted... not least because all the materials about Sai Baba I had on those websites are also on my more consolidated set of 3 websites now. This is simply an unsupported allegation by Moreno yet again. This matter will be addressed before long in another context.

Because Alan Kazlev chose to defend me against Moreno, he wants to imagine I use him as "as a pawn", thus trying maliciously to attribute what Kazlev wrote to me! How far will Moreno go to pervert facts, one wonders? Moreno does not know me, or realise therefore that I am not "disgruntled" or "angry", which words are the standard defence of the Sai Organisation against all critics - it is applied willy-nilly because they can't accept the fact that Sai Baba has actually been so widely exposed as a fraud. The fact is, having been deceived so thoroughly for so long by Sathya Sai Baba on many counts, I naturally became very concerned to demonstrate his deceptions in the interests of the uninformed and innocent who may be trapped by them as I was. I decided to make known the very widespread evidence that has been posted by scores of former devotees against him after they - like myself - found out many things which show he is not what he claims and is practicing fraudulence and deception on his followers, and large number of alleged serial homosexual abuses by him.

Yes, I wrote a book about Sai Baba when I was as deluded about him as is Moreno now, but I have also written a much longer book explaining the reasons for my leaving him, entitled 'End of the Dream'. Moreno is totally polarised because he has only ever seen one side of the issue and has always been very peripheral to the Sai movement and what goes on there (as he claims, he is no follower or devotee). Yet I discovered much which he has not done. Despite what Moreno says, I have cited many verifiable sources - not least many of the untruths propagated by Sai Baba from his own published words (some examples at: http://home.no.net/abacusa/T/index.htm), so this is simply another untruth of the kind Moreno is trying to propagate daily all over the web. My main website gives access to all my writings concerning Sai Baba and Co. at http://home.no.net/anir/Sai --] 10:12, 4 September 2006 (UTC)

Revision as of 10:12, 4 September 2006

Please do not edit the user pages of other contributors without their approval or consent, as you did with User:SSS108. It may be seen as vandalism. 1568 22:48, 2 September 2006 (UTC)

O.K. My edit of that page was due to my not yet knowing enough about how this system works. In my haste I thought the user page was specifically related to the attempt by Gerald Moreno, a person who defames and stalks me throughout the web because I am a critic of his guru, Sathya Sai Baba (the self-declared God Incarnate, the Father who sent Jesus to earth, and the Deity of all Deities!). The specific page was one about the Norwegian philosopher Arne Næss, on which SSS108 - who is Gerald 'Joe' Moreno - tried to interfere simply because it is I who made an edit there. .. i.e. in childish tit-for-tat pique fashion, because he had taken a defeat (from Alan Kazlev) over his attempt to hi-jack the Robert Priddy Wiki page with a link to his slanderous web pages against me. Other persons with insight into the subject concerning Arne Næss have since replaced the material I put there, which Moreno removed.

--ProEdits 19:22, 3 September 2006 (UTC)

For starters, I am not a devotee of Sathya Sai Baba, nor is he my Guru. This is a constant lie perpetuated by ProEdits (Robert Priddy) against me with no proof. The page about Arne Næss contained original research, which is not allowed on Misplaced Pages. ProEdits even called his material "original research" Ref. It is also important to point out that Robert Priddy (ProEdits) had a slanderous and defamatory link about Sathya Sai Baba on his Misplaced Pages article and used Alan Kazlev as a pawn to remove my link. Robert Priddy (ProEdits) has no less than 3 Anti-Sathya-Sai-Baba sites on the internet and has no less than 6 websites deleted for defamatory content against Sathya Sai Baba. Priddy is obviously oblivious to Misplaced Pages's policies on original research and citing reliable sources. As one can see, ProEdits is highly polarized and is incapable of telling the truth and backing it up with any verfiable sources. He was a former devotee of Sathya Sai Baba for 17/18 years and is now very disgruntled and angry at his former eulogy of Sathya Sai Baba as God Incarnate and the Avatar Of The Age. He even wrote a book about it. SSS108 04:42, 4 September 2006 (UTC)


I have not stated that SSS108 is a devotee of Sathya Sai Baba, nor that he is Moreno's guru since he surprisingly declared this himself after some time about 2 years ago. However, the massive diatribes against all critics of Sathya Sai Baba by Gerald Moreno on four websites, several blogs and numerous bulletin boards - totally in defense of this guru -shows enough about Gerald Joe Moreno's obsessive attitudes and total bias. His claim that I have had 6 websites deleted for defamation is not true, simply. There is NO PROOF of this copntrived allegation - and I have never been informed by any web server of having defamed anyone, which would be normal practice, for then I would obviously have reacted... not least because all the materials about Sai Baba I had on those websites are also on my more consolidated set of 3 websites now. This is simply an unsupported allegation by Moreno yet again. This matter will be addressed before long in another context.

Because Alan Kazlev chose to defend me against Moreno, he wants to imagine I use him as "as a pawn", thus trying maliciously to attribute what Kazlev wrote to me! How far will Moreno go to pervert facts, one wonders? Moreno does not know me, or realise therefore that I am not "disgruntled" or "angry", which words are the standard defence of the Sai Organisation against all critics - it is applied willy-nilly because they can't accept the fact that Sai Baba has actually been so widely exposed as a fraud. The fact is, having been deceived so thoroughly for so long by Sathya Sai Baba on many counts, I naturally became very concerned to demonstrate his deceptions in the interests of the uninformed and innocent who may be trapped by them as I was. I decided to make known the very widespread evidence that has been posted by scores of former devotees against him after they - like myself - found out many things which show he is not what he claims and is practicing fraudulence and deception on his followers, and large number of alleged serial homosexual abuses by him.

Yes, I wrote a book about Sai Baba when I was as deluded about him as is Moreno now, but I have also written a much longer book explaining the reasons for my leaving him, entitled 'End of the Dream'. Moreno is totally polarised because he has only ever seen one side of the issue and has always been very peripheral to the Sai movement and what goes on there (as he claims, he is no follower or devotee). Yet I discovered much which he has not done. Despite what Moreno says, I have cited many verifiable sources - not least many of the untruths propagated by Sai Baba from his own published words (some examples at: http://home.no.net/abacusa/T/index.htm), so this is simply another untruth of the kind Moreno is trying to propagate daily all over the web. My main website gives access to all my writings concerning Sai Baba and Co. at http://home.no.net/anir/Sai --84.208.99.96 10:12, 4 September 2006 (UTC)