| Revision as of 07:24, 9 September 2016 editRotary Engine (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Page movers11,478 edits →conflicts of interest: - oy vey← Previous edit | Revision as of 13:19, 9 September 2016 edit undoPeterTheFourth (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users5,071 edits →conflicts of interestNext edit → | ||
| Line 38: | Line 38: | ||
| As per Ryk72's recommendation I'm requesting that you attest to any conflicts of interest you may have with Crash Override Network. I asked this because of a consistent trend of meat-puppets acting on behalf of the subjects of the articles themselves. {{redact}} ] (]) 07:08, 9 September 2016 (UTC) <small>Partial redact per WP:NPA - ] <sup>]</sup> 07:24, 9 September 2016 (UTC)</small> | As per Ryk72's recommendation I'm requesting that you attest to any conflicts of interest you may have with Crash Override Network. I asked this because of a consistent trend of meat-puppets acting on behalf of the subjects of the articles themselves. {{redact}} ] (]) 07:08, 9 September 2016 (UTC) <small>Partial redact per WP:NPA - ] <sup>]</sup> 07:24, 9 September 2016 (UTC)</small> | ||
| * Whoa! To clarify, I did not make a recommendation that such a request be made; I made an admonition, in ] ] (see edit summary), that article Talk pages were not an appropriate place for this question to be asked. I also redacted part of the comment there, and now again here, which casts ] on specific editors &/or former editors; you need to link to evidence to make such statements about editors, and it (almost always) needs to be on-Wiki evidence. (No, that is not an invitation to do so; it is, in fact, a strong advisement to not do so. The question has been now asked; discussion of other editors is not required.) - ] <sup>]</sup> 07:24, 9 September 2016 (UTC) | * Whoa! To clarify, I did not make a recommendation that such a request be made; I made an admonition, in ] ] (see edit summary), that article Talk pages were not an appropriate place for this question to be asked. I also redacted part of the comment there, and now again here, which casts ] on specific editors &/or former editors; you need to link to evidence to make such statements about editors, and it (almost always) needs to be on-Wiki evidence. (No, that is not an invitation to do so; it is, in fact, a strong advisement to not do so. The question has been now asked; discussion of other editors is not required.) - ] <sup>]</sup> 07:24, 9 September 2016 (UTC) | ||
| :Thanks Ryk72. I am not Alex Lifschitz, Peter Coffin, Arthur Chu, or anybody else you might want to assume I am. I have no conflict of interest regarding this topic. ] (]) 13:19, 9 September 2016 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 13:19, 9 September 2016
Hello! If there's any reason you'd like to contact me, feel equally free to leave me a comment here or wikimail me- I should be able to reply fairly quickly in either case.
 Archives | ||
|
||
|
This page has archives. Sections older than 30 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 4 sections are present. |
AE request closed
I have closed an arbitration enforcement request that you filed regarding Ranze. The result is that no action was taken since the topic ban had expired before the edit in question was made. It should be noted that due to an error by the sanctioning administrator, you're not at fault for mistakenly believing that the ban was still in force. Seraphimblade 15:53, 15 July 2016 (UTC)
Proposed lead section
It might be worthwhile self-reverting the Proposal #3 from the Gamergate article. It's clearly over the top and misaligned with previous statements on the matter that it's likely to be seen as disruptive. Your mileage may, however, vary. - Ryk72 22:04, 8 August 2016 (UTC)
Drowtales
If you decided to take this to AFD again, ping me. I felt like the last discussion was closed way to early. Argento Surfer (talk) 12:46, 11 August 2016 (UTC)
- Will do. PeterTheFourth (talk) 13:01, 11 August 2016 (UTC)
- Argento Surfer, I created an AFD for it here. PeterTheFourth (talk) 13:14, 11 August 2016 (UTC)
A cup of tea for you!
|
Peter, you're dangerously close to your 3RR limit today. Please take a cup of tea and relax for a few hours, the Internet is not in danger because of a few more or less paragraphs at The Order of the Stick. Diego (talk) 12:20, 29 August 2016 (UTC) |
@Diego Moya: Thank you, Diego. However much of a jerk I am at times, I do genuinely appreciate this. PeterTheFourth (talk) 21:33, 29 August 2016 (UTC)
I understand the feeling, having been there myself several times. ^_^ Diego (talk) 21:46, 29 August 2016 (UTC)
conflicts of interest
As per Ryk72's recommendation I'm requesting that you attest to any conflicts of interest you may have with Crash Override Network. I asked this because of a consistent trend of meat-puppets acting on behalf of the subjects of the articles themselves. (Redacted) 24.84.155.22 (talk) 07:08, 9 September 2016 (UTC) Partial redact per WP:NPA - Ryk72 07:24, 9 September 2016 (UTC)
- Whoa! To clarify, I did not make a recommendation that such a request be made; I made an admonition, in these edits (see edit summary), that article Talk pages were not an appropriate place for this question to be asked. I also redacted part of the comment there, and now again here, which casts aspersions on specific editors &/or former editors; you need to link to evidence to make such statements about editors, and it (almost always) needs to be on-Wiki evidence. (No, that is not an invitation to do so; it is, in fact, a strong advisement to not do so. The question has been now asked; discussion of other editors is not required.) - Ryk72 07:24, 9 September 2016 (UTC)
- Thanks Ryk72. I am not Alex Lifschitz, Peter Coffin, Arthur Chu, or anybody else you might want to assume I am. I have no conflict of interest regarding this topic. PeterTheFourth (talk) 13:19, 9 September 2016 (UTC)