| Revision as of 17:01, 15 September 2016 editFelsic2 (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users4,178 edits →Personal comments: new section← Previous edit | Revision as of 17:10, 15 September 2016 edit undoFelsic2 (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users4,178 edits →Discretionary sanctions - firearms: new sectionTag: contentious topics alertNext edit → | ||
| Line 50: | Line 50: | ||
| This comment, , is an inappropriate personal attack that fails to assume good faith. Please withdraw it and do not make another like it. Firearms articles, presumably including the project itself, are covered by ArbCom's discretionary sanctions that specifically prohibit behavior like this. ] (]) 17:01, 15 September 2016 (UTC) | This comment, , is an inappropriate personal attack that fails to assume good faith. Please withdraw it and do not make another like it. Firearms articles, presumably including the project itself, are covered by ArbCom's discretionary sanctions that specifically prohibit behavior like this. ] (]) 17:01, 15 September 2016 (UTC) | ||
| == Discretionary sanctions - firearms == | |||
| {{Ivm|2='''Please carefully read this information:''' | |||
| The Arbitration Committee has authorised ] to be used for pages regarding governmental regulation of firearm ownership; the social, historical and political context of such regulation; and the people and organizations associated with these issues, a topic which you have edited. The Committee's decision is ]. | |||
| Discretionary sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimize disruption to controversial topics. This means ] administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to the topic that do not adhere to the ], our ], or relevant ]. Administrators may impose sanctions such as ], ], or ]. This message is to notify you sanctions are authorised for the topic you are editing. Before continuing to edit this topic, please familiarise yourself with the discretionary sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions. | |||
| This message is informational only and does not imply misconduct regarding your contributions to date. | |||
| }}{{Z33}}<!-- Derived from Template:Ds/alert --> ] (]) 17:10, 15 September 2016 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 17:10, 15 September 2016
 Archives |
|
Index 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10 |
|
This page has archives. Sections older than 5 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 4 sections are present. |
Wednesday 15 January08:05 UTC
Please add comments to the bottom
A page you started (2016 Nice terrorist attack) has been reviewed!
Thanks for creating 2016 Nice terrorist attack, DHeyward!
Misplaced Pages editor Pianoman320 just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:
Thanks for adding this redirect!
To reply, leave a comment on Pianoman320's talk page.
Learn more about page curation.
ANI notice
There is currently a discussion at Misplaced Pages:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is Gaming the system?. Thank you. Guy Macon (talk) 04:46, 3 September 2016 (UTC)
Firearm receivers
Please look at talk section for the article. Your assistance is requested in formulating the wording for a proposed subsection of the article. 66.103.35.72 (talk) 19:55, 4 September 2016 (UTC)
restored RfC
It appears you deleted a RfC opened by another editor, as well as comments by two editors from the Talk page of Conspiracy theories of the United States presidential election, 2016. I have restored it/them. The page itself has been protected by Airplaneman due to edit warring, which happens; edit warring at a Talk page, though, is a pretty big deal. I can't imagine what you were thinking. BlueSalix (talk) 04:22, 5 September 2016 (UTC)
Personal comments
This comment, "...these agenda driven accounts seek only to demonize firearms with undue weight accounts of rare use in crime", is an inappropriate personal attack that fails to assume good faith. Please withdraw it and do not make another like it. Firearms articles, presumably including the project itself, are covered by ArbCom's discretionary sanctions that specifically prohibit behavior like this. Felsic2 (talk) 17:01, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
Discretionary sanctions - firearms
Please carefully read this information:
The Arbitration Committee has authorised discretionary sanctions to be used for pages regarding governmental regulation of firearm ownership; the social, historical and political context of such regulation; and the people and organizations associated with these issues, a topic which you have edited. The Committee's decision is here.
Discretionary sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimize disruption to controversial topics. This means uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to the topic that do not adhere to the purpose of Misplaced Pages, our standards of behavior, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks. This message is to notify you sanctions are authorised for the topic you are editing. Before continuing to edit this topic, please familiarise yourself with the discretionary sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.
This message is informational only and does not imply misconduct regarding your contributions to date.