| Revision as of 03:08, 27 August 2016 editLowercase sigmabot III (talk | contribs)Bots, Template editors2,304,775 editsm Archiving 2 discussion(s) to User talk:Rjd0060/Archive 12) (bot← Previous edit | Revision as of 17:49, 23 September 2016 edit undoMediaWiki message delivery (talk | contribs)Bots3,139,635 edits →Extended confirmed protection: new sectionTag: MassMessage deliveryNext edit → | ||
| Line 53: | Line 53: | ||
| Hey, just wanted to give you a heads up, as I restored a number of prods, some of which you deleted. Full story at ], but in short the restorations were based on the inappropriate actions of the nominator, and there was nothing wrong on your end. ]] 03:11, 26 August 2016 (UTC) | Hey, just wanted to give you a heads up, as I restored a number of prods, some of which you deleted. Full story at ], but in short the restorations were based on the inappropriate actions of the nominator, and there was nothing wrong on your end. ]] 03:11, 26 August 2016 (UTC) | ||
| == Extended confirmed protection == | |||
| {{ivmbox|1=Hello, Rjd0060. This message is intended to notify administrators of important changes to the protection policy. | |||
| ] (also known as "30/500 protection") is a new level of page protection that only allows edits from accounts at least 30 days old and with 500 edits. The automatically assigned ] was created for this purpose. The protection level was created following ] with the primary intention of enforcing various arbitration remedies that prohibited editors under the "30 days/500 edits" threshold to edit certain topic areas. | |||
| In July and August 2016, ] established consensus for community use of the new protection level. Administrators are authorized to apply extended confirmed protection to combat any form of disruption (e.g. vandalism, sock puppetry, edit warring, etc.) on any topic, subject to the following conditions: | |||
| * '''Extended confirmed protection may only be used in cases where semi-protection has proven ineffective'''. It should not be used as a first resort. | |||
| * '''A bot will post a notification at ] of each use'''. MusikBot currently does this by updating ], which is transcluded onto the noticeboard. | |||
| Please review ] carefully before using this new level of protection on pages. Thank you. <br><small>This message was sent to the administrators' ]. To opt-out of future messages, please remove yourself from the list. 17:49, 23 September 2016 (UTC)</small> |2=Padlock-blue.svg}} | |||
| <!--Message sent following discussion at WT:PP--> | |||
| <!-- Message sent by User:Xaosflux@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Misplaced Pages:Administrators/Message_list&oldid=737471142 --> | |||
Revision as of 17:49, 23 September 2016
I will usually reply to messages left here on this page so check back for a response.
 Archives
|
Nomination of Bruce Maiman for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Bruce Maiman is suitable for inclusion in Misplaced Pages according to Misplaced Pages's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Bruce Maiman until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Episerver Article Deletion
Hello - The Episerver (EPiServer) -- https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=EPiServer&action=edit&redlink=1 -- page was deleted by you in October 2015. The reason is -- "Expired PROD, concern was: No evidence of notability. Only one reference that might possibly be considered independent, and that is no more than an announcement of a business deal."
I am hoping to have this page restored. There is evidence of notability as one of the top web content management systems and ecommerce platforms, and you will see independent references below, including other Misplaced Pages articles. I work for Episerver and I am happy to update the article with relevant content and proper citations. Is there any way you can reinstate the article or make a recommendation on how I can get it undeleted? I'd appreciate any help you can offer. Thank you in advance. References on the Internet
BRIEF-Clavister announces a deployment of W50 firewalls by Episerve
8 Benefits of Multi-Channel Digital Marketing
An Interview with James Stout, Senior Manager, Technology and Developer Evangelist, Episerver
An epic Episerver Ascend 2015 customer conference
Episerver Releases Digital Experience Cloud Fall 15
References within Misplaced Pages
User Concern
Hello. I wasn't sure who to reach out to so since you are the last administrator that last blocked this person's account I wanted to let you know. I saw that user User:64.183.48.206 has been blocked before and they are adding unsourced information again and the same information is also being added by User:2602:306:BDC5:6DC0:3C88:91E7:1AAA:E1B8. I don't want to get in an edit war with this person so I wanted to let someone know. Thank you. LongLiveMusic (talk) 00:08, 14 August 2016 (UTC)
Abdullah Isa Neil Dougan
Can we discuss please your decision to delete the article on Abdullah Isa Neil Dougan? I'm relatively inexperienced with Misplaced Pages, but it concerns me that a PROD which gives only seven days' notice of intention to delete may not be seen in time by interested parties and stakeholders who visit a page infrequently. In any event, as someone who personally knew Dougan, was a pupil when he was alive and has studied his teachings for almost 40 years, I would immediately and vigorously have objected. Paul (talk) 08:41, 24 August 2016 (UTC)
Restored a bunch of prods
Hey, just wanted to give you a heads up, as I restored a number of prods, some of which you deleted. Full story at WP:AN#Deceitful PRODs, but in short the restorations were based on the inappropriate actions of the nominator, and there was nothing wrong on your end. Monty845 03:11, 26 August 2016 (UTC)
Extended confirmed protection
Hello, Rjd0060. This message is intended to notify administrators of important changes to the protection policy.
Extended confirmed protection (also known as "30/500 protection") is a new level of page protection that only allows edits from accounts at least 30 days old and with 500 edits. The automatically assigned "extended confirmed" user right was created for this purpose. The protection level was created following this community discussion with the primary intention of enforcing various arbitration remedies that prohibited editors under the "30 days/500 edits" threshold to edit certain topic areas.
In July and August 2016, a request for comment established consensus for community use of the new protection level. Administrators are authorized to apply extended confirmed protection to combat any form of disruption (e.g. vandalism, sock puppetry, edit warring, etc.) on any topic, subject to the following conditions:
- Extended confirmed protection may only be used in cases where semi-protection has proven ineffective. It should not be used as a first resort.
- A bot will post a notification at Misplaced Pages:Administrators' noticeboard of each use. MusikBot currently does this by updating a report, which is transcluded onto the noticeboard.
Please review the protection policy carefully before using this new level of protection on pages. Thank you.
This message was sent to the administrators' mass message list. To opt-out of future messages, please remove yourself from the list. 17:49, 23 September 2016 (UTC)
- "Gartner Names Web Content Management Leaders". CMS Wire. Simpler Media Group, Inc.