Misplaced Pages

Revision as of 11:31, 24 September 2016

Unblocked

Per your agreement by email with the following conditions, your indefinite block is lifted.

1. Your indefinite topic ban from all pages related to India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan, broadly construed imposed on 15 May 2014 remains in force, subject to the usual enforcement procedures.
2. You are be limited to one account.
3. You are required to remain civil. As a condition of your unblock, you must acknowledge that any edit which, in the opinion of an uninvolved administrator, contains personal attacks or gross incivility will be met with blocks of escalating length, ending with an indefinite block after the fourth offense.
4. Blocks under clause 3 may be appealed to AE, excepting an indefinite block, which can be appealed to BASC only.
5. These restrictions will be logged at Misplaced Pages:Editing restrictions. A copy of these restrictions will be placed on your user talk page, they must not be removed until at least 1 month after your most recent block (for any reason).
6. These sanctions will expire 12 months after your ban is lifted, or 12 months from most recent block, whichever is later, even if such block is not imposed under these sanctions. (Note that your topic ban mentioned in the first clause will not automatically expire, that will have to be appealed in the normal manner.)

Let me be the first to welcome you back, and wish you happy editing.

For the Ban Appeals Sub-Committee;

Courcelles (talk) 17:17, 26 March 2015 (UTC)

• Welcome back to en.wiki. ! OccultZone (Talk • Contributions • Log) 17:18, 26 March 2015 (UTC)

• + 1 - Sitush (talk) 17:41, 26 March 2015 (UTC)

Cheers guys, will be a while till I am my old abusive self ) Darkness Shines (talk) 18:00, 26 March 2015 (UTC)

It might be an idea not even to, ahem, abuse yourself, at least for a while. "Fecking typos" might upset the civility police. - Sitush (talk) 18:43, 26 March 2015 (UTC)

• + 1 Writegeist (talk) 18:18, 26 March 2015 (UTC)

Sit, I feel quite sure that I can use my own peoples language, those that may not appreciate it I figure I can call "racist" or "mickophobic", anything along those lines ought to shut them up ) Darkness Shines (talk) 18:52, 26 March 2015 (UTC)

Glad to have you back. — Yash!  19:04, 26 March 2015 (UTC)

Second that ^ Fitzcarmalan (talk) 19:37, 26 March 2015 (UTC)

• Thanks Courcelles. Welcome back DS--no monkey business please. :) Drmies (talk) 01:32, 28 March 2015 (UTC)

I didn't know you had been unblocked, apologies for not noticing sooner, and a very belated welcome back. I'm glad things have been remedied this way. Nick (talk) 13:11, 29 April 2015 (UTC)

Arbitration enforcement block

If you believe this block is unjustified, please read the guide to appealing blocks (specifically this section) before appealing. Place the following on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Please copy my appeal to the ] or ]. Your reason here OR place the reason below this template. ~~~~}}. If you intend to appeal on the arbitration enforcement noticeboard I suggest you use the arbitration enforcement appeals template on your talk page so it can be copied over easily. You may also appeal directly to me (by email), before or instead of appealing on your talk page. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 06:31, 13 May 2015 (UTC)

Reminder to administrators: In May 2014, ArbCom adopted a procedure instructing administrators as follows: "No administrator may modify a sanction placed by another administrator without: (1) the explicit prior affirmative consent of the enforcing administrator; or (2) prior affirmative agreement for the modification at (a) AE or (b) AN or (c) ARCA (see "Important notes" ). Administrators modifying sanctions out of process may at the discretion of the committee be desysopped."

Precious again

innocent victims
Thank you ("you obviously can edit really well when you choose" and don't give a shit) for quality articles such as Rape during the Bangladesh Liberation War and Cambodian genocide, opening our eyes for innocent victims, for striking, saying sorry and thanks, - thank you, you are an awesome Wikipedian!

--Gerda Arendt (talk) 07:06, 15 May 2014 (UTC)

A year ago, you were the 856th recipient of my PumpkinSky Prize, - during that year I learned what AE stands for, - better blocked than missed, take care, --Gerda Arendt (talk) 08:20, 15 May 2015 (UTC)

It does seem excessive. DS was indef blocked for socking, not for incivility. Placing special civility conditions on him is overkill. But, I'm not sanguine about his surviving here for an entire year - the next block will be longer, and the dreaded banned for ever looms. --regentspark (comment) 14:46, 15 May 2015 (UTC)

Thanks Gerda, but as I am going to get indeffed again I will no longer be editing, happy editing to you guys though. Darkness Shines (talk) 15:37, 15 May 2015 (UTC)

It helped me, - thanks for the good wishes, and yes, I am happier than a year ago, --Gerda Arendt (talk) 10:17, 17 May 2015 (UTC)

Sorry DS. It looks like you're gone. Not surprised looking at the content contributions (or lack of) of the admins commenting on the AE request. But, you're probably better off because this wasn't a workable proposition the way Misplaced Pages is set up. Back to RL and find some other source of stress. --regentspark (comment) 12:40, 17 May 2015 (UTC)

I wouldn't mind so much but I couldn't even comment over there my keyboard id fucked and can't really use a mobile for shite like that, they totally ignore the hounding by fpas and ignore the unblock provisions granted by basc, it is a fucking joke Darkness Shines (talk) 12:48, 17 May 2015 (UTC)

Two years ago, you were recipient no. 856 of Precious, a prize of QAI (the cabal of the outcasts)! --Gerda Arendt (talk) 20:51, 15 May 2016 (UTC)

Blocked

If you believe this block is unjustified, please read the guide to appealing blocks (specifically this section) before appealing. Place the following on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Please copy my appeal to the ] or ]. Your reason here OR place the reason below this template. ~~~~}}. If you intend to appeal on the arbitration enforcement noticeboard I suggest you use the arbitration enforcement appeals template on your talk page so it can be copied over easily. You may also appeal directly to me (by email), before or instead of appealing on your talk page. 

Reminder to administrators: In May 2014, ArbCom adopted a procedure instructing administrators as follows: "No administrator may modify a sanction placed by another administrator without: (1) the explicit prior affirmative consent of the enforcing administrator; or (2) prior affirmative agreement for the modification at (a) AE or (b) AN or (c) ARCA (see "Important notes" ). Administrators modifying sanctions out of process may at the discretion of the committee be desysopped."

Heimstern Läufer (talk) 12:28, 27 May 2015 (UTC)

Unblock

Arbitration enforcement action appeal by Darkness Shines

@RegentsPark: Would you be so kind as to copy this to AE and also let Heimstern know I am appealing his block, obviously I cannot :-) Darkness Shines (talk) 22:07, 23 September 2016 (UTC)

DS - I was going to copy this over for you, but I don't think this is an AE sanction at the moment. It was an indef block, but the 'special' AE rules only applied for the first year of that, since it's passed that you should be able to appeal this as a normal block (that is, with {{unblock}} or to WP:UTRS). I'll leave Heimstern a note that you intend to appeal. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 00:20, 24 September 2016 (UTC)

OK Cal, thanks.

Darkness Shines (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Notes:

• In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
• Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.

If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "blocking administrator" with the name of the blocking admin:

{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2=It has been over a year since I was blocked, I should like to be able to edit legitimately again if that is at all possible. ] (]) 00:27, 24 September 2016 (UTC) |3 = ~~~~}}

If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}} with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.

{{unblock reviewed |1=It has been over a year since I was blocked, I should like to be able to edit legitimately again if that is at all possible. ] (]) 00:27, 24 September 2016 (UTC) |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}

If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here with your rationale:

{{unblock reviewed |1=It has been over a year since I was blocked, I should like to be able to edit legitimately again if that is at all possible. ] (]) 00:27, 24 September 2016 (UTC) |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}

Before this is declined - what went wrong and what will you do differently? Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 01:27, 24 September 2016 (UTC)

I was too quick to lose my temper, best course of action for that is log out before responding, easy enough. Darkness Shines (talk) 02:09, 24 September 2016 (UTC)

Callanecc, you might want to check out the consistent (and recent) socking... and this is only the part that was caught. This appeal looks like a joke after all that. --lTopGunl (talk) 11:30, 24 September 2016 (UTC)

• Requests for unblock