Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license.
Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat.
We can research this topic together.
== Some copyright claimers are scammers. Beware! ==
We all know that Viacom and Shopro are the most common companies that make copyright claims on videos. But there may be something different. Even if your video wasn't copied or doesn't match another user's video, it can still be taken down by a copyright claim. Once you notice that your video is taken down, and if is wasn't by a legitimate copyright company, it must be a mistake or that there is someone else haunting you or spamming you. For example, falsely make copyright claims on videos affiliated with , and that's considered vandalism, plagiarism, and conspiracy. Once a channel has 3 or more copyright strikes, it cannot upload videos until resolving those copyright strikes by making counter notifications. It usually takes a few days for YouTube to forward the counter notifications to the one who took down the video, and the claimant has 2 weeks to provide proof of court action to assure the video stays down, otherwise the video taken down will be restored. Furthermore, the copyright claiming account can be terminated if abusing the feature of making claims and if not providing proof of court action on multiple counts to reject counter notifications. ] (]) 02:57, 26 September 2016 (UTC)
Revision as of 02:57, 26 September 2016
This article has not yet been rated on Misplaced Pages's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Google, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Google and related topics on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GoogleWikipedia:WikiProject GoogleTemplate:WikiProject GoogleGoogle
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Internet, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Internet on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.InternetWikipedia:WikiProject InternetTemplate:WikiProject InternetInternet
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Pirate Politics, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.Pirate PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject Pirate PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Pirate PoliticsPirate Politics
Some copyright claimers are scammers. Beware!
We all know that Viacom and Shopro are the most common companies that make copyright claims on videos. But there may be something different. Even if your video wasn't copied or doesn't match another user's video, it can still be taken down by a copyright claim. Once you notice that your video is taken down, and if is wasn't by a legitimate copyright company, it must be a mistake or that there is someone else haunting you or spamming you. For example, this channel falsely make copyright claims on videos affiliated with this channel, and that's considered vandalism, plagiarism, and conspiracy. Once a channel has 3 or more copyright strikes, it cannot upload videos until resolving those copyright strikes by making counter notifications. It usually takes a few days for YouTube to forward the counter notifications to the one who took down the video, and the claimant has 2 weeks to provide proof of court action to assure the video stays down, otherwise the video taken down will be restored. Furthermore, the copyright claiming account can be terminated if abusing the feature of making claims and if not providing proof of court action on multiple counts to reject counter notifications. 50.29.199.144 (talk) 02:57, 26 September 2016 (UTC)
