Misplaced Pages

Revision as of 03:18, 1 October 2016

There have been attempts to recruit editors of specific viewpoints to this article, in a manner that does not comply with Misplaced Pages's policies. Editors are encouraged to use neutral mechanisms for requesting outside input (e.g. a "request for comment", a third opinion or other noticeboard post, or neutral criteria: "pinging all editors who have edited this page in the last 48 hours"). If someone has asked you to provide your opinion here, examine the arguments, not the editors who have made them. Reminder: disputes are resolved by consensus, not by majority vote.

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Long-term effects of cannabis article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic. New to Misplaced Pages? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help. Assume good faith Be polite and avoid personal attacks Be welcoming to newcomers Seek dispute resolution if needed Article policies Neutral point of view No original research Verifiability

Find medical sources: Source guidelines · PubMed · Cochrane · DOAJ · Gale · OpenMD · ScienceDirect · Springer · Trip · Wiley · TWL

Archives: 1Auto-archiving period: 45 days

This article has not yet been rated on Misplaced Pages's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details. Cannabis High‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Cannabis, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of cannabis on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CannabisWikipedia:WikiProject CannabisTemplate:WikiProject CannabisCannabis High This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale. Psychoactive and Recreational Drugs (defunct) This article is within the scope of WikiProject Psychoactive and Recreational Drugs, a project which is currently considered to be defunct.Psychoactive and Recreational DrugsWikipedia:WikiProject Psychoactive and Recreational DrugsTemplate:WikiProject Psychoactive and Recreational DrugsPsychoactive and Recreational Drugs Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details. Medicine: Toxicology Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Medicine, which recommends that medicine-related articles follow the Manual of Style for medicine-related articles and that biomedical information in any article use high-quality medical sources. Please visit the project page for details or ask questions at Misplaced Pages talk:WikiProject Medicine.MedicineWikipedia:WikiProject MedicineTemplate:WikiProject Medicinemedicine Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by the Toxicology task force.

Error: Target page was not specified with to.

Cannabis-associated respiratory disease was nominated for deletion. The discussion was closed on 26 May 2013 with a consensus to merge. Its contents were merged into Long-term effects of cannabis. The original page is now a redirect to this page. For the contribution history and old versions of the redirected article, please see its history; for its talk page, see here.

The contents of the Cannabis-associated respiratory disease page were merged into Long-term effects of cannabis on 27 May 2013. For the contribution history and old versions of the redirected page, please see its history; for the discussion at that location, see its talk page.

Proper sourcing

Editors, before adding content please refer to WP:MEDRS. Medical claims have different sourcing requirements than other wiki content. Secondary reviews published in respected medical journals from the last 5 years are good sources. Primary studies alone, news articles, etc are not good sources and will usually result in deleted content. Psyden (talk) 16:11, 10 March 2016 (UTC)

I don't understand. The references were taken from a section on the Depersonalisation page. If the references are valid there, why are they not as valid here? Luxorbostian 00:29, 12 March 2016 (GMT)

They are not valid on that page either. I do not edit that page however. Psyden (talk) 00:36, 12 March 2016 (UTC)

Overall Tone of Article and Veracity of Information

Wow. Just wow. Is this Misplaced Pages? This article is so obviously slanted against cannabis use that it rivals governmental and treatment-industry propoganda. I direct your attention to such obvious lies as "...and in the US 10 to 20% of consumers who use cannabis daily become dependent." Really? A 20% dependency rate? That's laughable. And the one accurate fact cited - the zero mortality rate - was only done so begrudgingly, surrounding it with weasely language suggesting that a lack of sufficient research renders that fact as suspect. 184.98.96.86 (talk) 20:12, 4 March 2016 (UTC) MrNaturalAZ 20160304

I do not believe that the general public will take much of this article seriously. While most claims are properly sourced, its tone is approaching that of NIDA propaganda. Much of the article mentions claims that are inconclusive, out of context, rarely occur, etc. Confounding is rarely eliminated and evidence is weak for many claims. Some claims are likely simple associations, yet many readers will interpret this as implying causation. These points are not always made clear to the reader. Psyden (talk) 15:59, 10 March 2016 (UTC)

Our recreational drug articles in general leave a lot to be desired. Unless someone like you cares a whole awful lot, nothing is going to get better... it's not. Sizeofint (talk) 17:53, 10 March 2016 (UTC)

Twisted Article

This is one of the most twisted articles I've read on wikipedia. Let me get this straight? webmd is a valid source of clinical research? Smoking Grass does not cause COPB so all that coughing you see with users coughing up blood is what then?

---pfff — Preceding unsigned comment added by 96.57.23.82 (talk) 16:25, 13 September 2015 (UTC)

I assume you mean COPD? Coughing has many causes, coughing up blood is not a symptom of COPD. The COPD claims are not sourced to WebMD. Psyden (talk) 16:08, 10 March 2016 (UTC)

I am smoke weed and i dont cough out blood

Shawn...1 (talk) 03:18, 1 October 2016 (UTC)

causation vs. correlation

This article doesn't do a good job of distinguishing between causation and correlation. Use of the phrases "increased risk" (Depressive disorder), "worsen the occurrence" (Mania symptoms) and "increases the risk" (Suicidal behavior) asserts causality instead of accurately discussing correlation. It is just as, if not more, likely that persons with depression, mania or suicidality are using cannabis to cope with these conditions than that the cannabis is causing or contributing to these conditions (i.e. increasing the risk or worsening the occurrence). Let's talk about it and see if we can make more accurate descriptions. 74.42.81.206 (talk) 06:08, 16 February 2015 (UTC)nate vazquez

Ideally the article should reflect the language of the sources. Sizeofint (talk) 21:56, 4 March 2016 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Long-term effects of cannabis. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.ancd.org.au/publications/pdf/rp11_cannabis_questions.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—_{Talk to my owner:Online} 21:15, 2 April 2016 (UTC)

Bad Article

Why is there no information about the health benefits assoicated with use? And also that studies that allege some harmful effects---this fails to mention that its the smoke, not the cannabinoids themselves, which have any known links to cancer. In fact, studies have shown they have strong anti-cancer/anti-tumor properties. Came to this article and only found one sided, slant ed, and bad info. This article needs expansion. 2601:645:8302:842F:C06:55B2:F8B:716 (talk) 22:42, 24 July 2016 (UTC)

Well, psychoactive drug articles are pretty crappy in general on Misplaced Pages. I agree it needs work. When dealing with medical content we use the WP:MEDRS sourcing guideline. This restricts some of the sources we can use. You're welcome to improve this article as long as it stays within MEDRS. Sizeofint (talk) 02:23, 25 July 2016 (UTC)

• Misplaced Pages controversial topics
• All unassessed articles
• C-Class Cannabis articles
• High-importance Cannabis articles
• WikiProject Cannabis articles
• C-Class medicine articles
• Mid-importance medicine articles
• C-Class toxicology articles
• Unknown-importance toxicology articles
• Toxicology task force articles
• All WikiProject Medicine pages