Misplaced Pages

:Articles for deletion/Andy Stanley (2nd nomination): Difference between revisions - Misplaced Pages

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
< Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 01:25, 6 September 2006 editOhconfucius (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers328,947 edits []← Previous edit Revision as of 08:04, 7 September 2006 edit undoKmaguir1 (talk | contribs)871 edits []Next edit →
Line 12: Line 12:
*'''Keep''' per above. ] 19:05, 5 September 2006 (UTC) *'''Keep''' per above. ] 19:05, 5 September 2006 (UTC)
*'''Keep''' as pssing ]. Books with independent reviews, and respectably rank in the low thousandsths per Amazon. ] 01:25, 6 September 2006 (UTC) *'''Keep''' as pssing ]. Books with independent reviews, and respectably rank in the low thousandsths per Amazon. ] 01:25, 6 September 2006 (UTC)
*'''Keep''' per if this were anyone else it wouldn't have been nominated.-] 08:04, 7 September 2006 (UTC)

Revision as of 08:04, 7 September 2006

Andy Stanley

Not notable. Pastor at a church, and books of unknown/questionable publishing. This was nominated before in Jan. 2005, but was never closed. Someone seriously tamperred with the AfD process in and it was never closed or debated, view Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Andy Stanley for details. The thechurchreport.com lists him as influential, but searching "thechurchreport.com" at yahoo I get 40 hits. He fails WP:BIO. Arbusto 01:57, 5 September 2006 (UTC)

Note: nominator Arbustoo improperly deleted the vote by 205.157.110.11 (talk · contribs) with the following summary "rv this IP that has hit every single one of my AfDs and ONLY my AfDs", however, user 205.157.110.11 has participated in a number of AfDs not nominated by Arbustoo, so that accusation is baseless and without merit. In any case, the proper thing to do would not be to delete the users vote and comment, but rather make a comment under his vote suggesting that he is only voting to spite Arbustoo, if that is what Arbustoo seems to be claiming by his deletion. Vivaldi (talk) 07:54, 5 September 2006 (UTC)
Categories: