| Revision as of 18:19, 9 November 2016 editTenebrae (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users155,424 edits →Arrival: more← Previous edit | Revision as of 19:41, 9 November 2016 edit undoA.amitkumar (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers20,480 edits →ArrivalNext edit → | ||
| Line 31: | Line 31: | ||
| ==Arrival== | ==Arrival== | ||
| Please see ], quoting ]. --] (]) 18:19, 9 November 2016 (UTC) | Please see ], quoting ]. --] (]) 18:19, 9 November 2016 (UTC) | ||
| : Quite self contradictory section of ] since it does say this too which seems that upcoming films and lost films are eligible to have a plot summary too... Any lost movies which is not available to general public shouldn't have a plot summary? I think just because it has happened elsewhere or some other time doesn't warrant putting the same reasoning for every edit and trying to own the article using similar predicaments. | |||
| Exceptions to the rule include upcoming films and "lost" films (which are not available to the public to verify), for which editors should use secondary sources. | |||
| <span style="font-family:Bradley Hand ITC;">]]</span> 19:41, 9 November 2016 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 19:41, 9 November 2016
 Archives |
|
This page has archives. Sections older than 5 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 2 sections are present. |
WP is not a place for knowledge gathering anymore, by arguing here you agree to be one of the assholes messing up WP This user is no longer very active on Misplaced Pages.
Dash
Hello. I didn't include a source about the French usage of dash because it is a wide-spread common knowledge about the French language: any source would be only ERROR sorry . I have re-entered the section because I thought its removal was the result of a bug. If you still think you know better than me, then remove it again, and I won't keep insisting. (in the version you "deleted", i however mentioned novellist George Simenon.)
Nomination of Software in retail for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Software in retail is suitable for inclusion in Misplaced Pages according to Misplaced Pages's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Software in retail until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
In reply to a vandalism reversal earlier this month
Hey, made an account since apparently I was an IP user previously. Haven't done more than read Misplaced Pages til now, so haven't bothered with an account. Anyway, I wanted to say that I am sorry about the incident on the Martha Graham page, and that it surprised me, as I neither remember viewing the page nor making an edit to it. It is possible that since there are many computers on our home's intranet, another family member may be the one who made the edit, though this to me seems rather unlikely, especially considering the nature of the edit. Lastly, I would just like to thank you for the warning and information, for your contributions to keeping Misplaced Pages vandalism-free. :) — Preceding unsigned comment added by SUN Babudro (talk • contribs) 16:09, 21 October 2016 (UTC)
Arrival
Please see Talk:Arrival (film)#Arrival's Plot, quoting WP:FILMPLOT. --Tenebrae (talk) 18:19, 9 November 2016 (UTC)
- Quite self contradictory section of WP:FILMPLOT since it does say this too which seems that upcoming films and lost films are eligible to have a plot summary too... Any lost movies which is not available to general public shouldn't have a plot summary? I think just because it has happened elsewhere or some other time doesn't warrant putting the same reasoning for every edit and trying to own the article using similar predicaments.
Exceptions to the rule include upcoming films and "lost" films (which are not available to the public to verify), for which editors should use secondary sources.