Misplaced Pages

:Sockpuppet investigations/Neptunekh: Difference between revisions - Misplaced Pages

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
< Misplaced Pages:Sockpuppet investigations Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 00:29, 4 February 2016 editMike V (talk | contribs)28,285 edits Archiving case to Misplaced Pages:Sockpuppet investigations/Neptunekh/Archive← Previous edit Revision as of 04:07, 10 November 2016 edit undoNil Einne (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers73,100 editsNo edit summaryNext edit →
Line 2: Line 2:
{{SPIarchive notice|Neptunekh}} {{SPIarchive notice|Neptunekh}}
{{SPIpriorcases}} {{SPIpriorcases}}


===10 November 2016===
{{SPI case status|CUrequest}}

====Suspected sockpuppets====

* {{checkuser|1=Swancat}}


<!-- You may duplicate the templates above ({{checkuser}} and {{checkIP}}) to list more accounts-->
* <small>''Auto-generated every hour.''</small>
*

Seems a clear cut duck. I'm only asking for a CU in case there are sleepers but I don't care that much either way. Editor is adding categories to articles nearly? always with underscores including sometimes sexual or gender orientation or identity related and if not generally entertainment related , they've also done this when creating categories . Editor has also identified as coming from BC . Their questions to the RD are generally entertainment related or weird personal advice questions (see also the question where they identified as coming from BC), one time relating to sexual orientation or identity . All of these but particularly category stuff (which I believe are the reason for the ban) are hallmarks of previous Neptunekh socks, as established in previous checkusers. ] (]) 04:07, 10 November 2016 (UTC) ] (]) 04:07, 10 November 2016 (UTC)

====<big>Comments by other users</big>====
<small>''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See ].''</small>


====<big>Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments</big>====


----<!--- All comments go ABOVE this line, please. -->

Revision as of 04:07, 10 November 2016

Neptunekh

Neptunekh (talk · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)

Populated account categories: confirmed · suspected

For archived investigations, see Misplaced Pages:Sockpuppet investigations/Neptunekh/Archive.



10 November 2016

– A user has requested CheckUser. An SPI clerk will shortly look at the case and endorse or decline the request.

Suspected sockpuppets


Seems a clear cut duck. I'm only asking for a CU in case there are sleepers but I don't care that much either way. Editor is adding categories to articles nearly? always with underscores including sometimes sexual or gender orientation or identity related and if not generally entertainment related , they've also done this when creating categories . Editor has also identified as coming from BC . Their questions to the RD are generally entertainment related or weird personal advice questions (see also the question where they identified as coming from BC), one time relating to sexual orientation or identity . All of these but particularly category stuff (which I believe are the reason for the ban) are hallmarks of previous Neptunekh socks, as established in previous checkusers. Nil Einne (talk) 04:07, 10 November 2016 (UTC) Nil Einne (talk) 04:07, 10 November 2016 (UTC)

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.


Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

Categories: