Misplaced Pages

User talk:Propol: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 15:43, 10 September 2006 editPropol (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users1,703 edits →Your ANI posting← Previous edit Revision as of 16:30, 10 September 2006 edit undoERcheck (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Administrators44,345 edits →Your ANI posting: commentNext edit →
Line 86: Line 86:


:Thanks for the reponse. I also provided an update there. ] 15:43, 10 September 2006 (UTC) :Thanks for the reponse. I also provided an update there. ] 15:43, 10 September 2006 (UTC)

:: Moving this conversation from ANI to your talk page. On blogs — Can you ] that the Zorn blog does have editorial oversight/fact checking. While I do agree that a ''Chicago Tribune'' columnist is likely a reliable source, the distinction between blogs may be a difficult argument to make when you are trying to convince other editors. — ] (]) 16:30, 10 September 2006 (UTC)

Revision as of 16:30, 10 September 2006

Hi.


Welcome

Hello Propol, and welcome to Misplaced Pages! Here are some recommended guidelines to help you get involved. Please feel free to contact me if you need help with anything. Best of luck and happy editing! Alphachimp 18:58, 22 July 2006 (UTC)
Getting started
Getting your info out there
Getting more Misplaced Pages rules
Getting help
Getting along
Getting technical

roskam

Hi Propol,

I'm wondering why you oppose adding the Josh Marshall text to the Roskam article. Feel free to reply here — goethean ॐ 18:54, 10 August 2006 (UTC)

Peter Roskam

I was asked, as I set out, in a bit more detail, at Talk:Peter Roskam, to act as an advocate for Joehazelton relative to the Roskam article, and I have attempted to delineate precisely those issues about which Joe is concerned and to frame several questions rather clearly in order that a focused discussion might be undertaken. On Joe's behalf, and in view of my appreciation for the advancement of the project, I'd ask that, at your leisure, you offer your views at the Roskam talk page. Thanks very kindly in advance! Joe 05:02, 12 August 2006 (UTC)

I posted a response at Talk:Peter Roskam. Thanks. Propol 18:08, 12 August 2006 (UTC)

Your ANI posting

Propol, I've responded to your ANI posting. I hope both parties will be open to dispute resolution and that both of the articles will become balanced. — ERcheck (talk) 12:02, 10 September 2006 (UTC)

Thanks for the reponse. I also provided an update there. Propol 15:43, 10 September 2006 (UTC)
Moving this conversation from ANI to your talk page. On blogs — Can you verify that the Zorn blog does have editorial oversight/fact checking. While I do agree that a Chicago Tribune columnist is likely a reliable source, the distinction between blogs may be a difficult argument to make when you are trying to convince other editors. — ERcheck (talk) 16:30, 10 September 2006 (UTC)