Revision as of 20:38, 21 November 2016 editTBMilnes (talk | contribs)48 edits →Numbers of AIP Submarines: new section← Previous edit | Revision as of 20:39, 21 November 2016 edit undoSineBot (talk | contribs)Bots2,556,209 editsm Signing comment by TBMilnes - "→Numbers of AIP Submarines: new section"Next edit → | ||
Line 110: | Line 110: | ||
== Numbers of AIP Submarines == | == Numbers of AIP Submarines == | ||
BilCat, I'm the one that added the numbers of each submarine type to the ] on the ] page. I think that information is helpful because most of those platforms only offer AIP as an option and so I find the number using AIP helpful separate from the. There is also the distinction between those submarines that were designed for AIP from the start, and those that were retrofit. If you disagree with the format or citations let me know and I'll address them, but please don't roll back the work done to compile that information. It was all pulled from the information on the main wikipedia page for each submarine type. Thanks! -Tom | BilCat, I'm the one that added the numbers of each submarine type to the ] on the ] page. I think that information is helpful because most of those platforms only offer AIP as an option and so I find the number using AIP helpful separate from the. There is also the distinction between those submarines that were designed for AIP from the start, and those that were retrofit. If you disagree with the format or citations let me know and I'll address them, but please don't roll back the work done to compile that information. It was all pulled from the information on the main wikipedia page for each submarine type. Thanks! -Tom <!-- Template:Unsigned --><small class="autosigned">— Preceding ] comment added by ] (] • ]) 20:38, 21 November 2016 (UTC)</small> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> |
Revision as of 20:39, 21 November 2016
This user is busy in real life and may not respond swiftly to queries. |
This user is somewhat active on Misplaced Pages, and limits his activities to a small range of pages and mostly non-contentious discussions. There may be periods in which the user is not active due to life issues.
This user talk page might be watched by friendly talk page stalkers, which means that someone other than me might reply to your query. Their input is welcome and their help with messages that I cannot reply to quickly is appreciated. |
|
This is a Misplaced Pages user talk page. This is not an encyclopedia article or the talk page for an encyclopedia article. If you find this page on any site other than Misplaced Pages, you are viewing a mirror site. Be aware that the page may be outdated and that the user whom this page is about may have no personal affiliation with any site other than Misplaced Pages. The original talk page is located at https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:BilCat. |
Archives |
|
This page has archives. Sections older than 21 days may be automatically archived by ClueBot III when more than 4 sections are present. |
Just to let you know
This "account", whom you correctly reverted yesterday, is now a CU confirmed sock. Thought you might be interested. Bests - LouisAragon (talk) 16:33, 1 November 2016 (UTC)
- I thought it was a sock when I reverted it. Thanks for letting me know. - BilCat (talk) 20:24, 1 November 2016 (UTC)
2K12 Kub
Hello BilCat or talk page watchers, please could you take a look at this edit to 2K12 Kub? It was closely followed by another edit from a different editor, which you reverted. But I am wondering if there may actually have been problems with both edits. Thank you. MPS1992 (talk) 18:21, 2 November 2016 (UTC)
- That edit on Nov. 1 apparently included sources. The source for the first paragraph had an OK source, but the second one used a forum page as a source (tagged it). I suggest asking at Talk:2K12 Kub and maybe WT:MILHIST for more help. -Fnlayson (talk) 16:31, 4 November 2016 (UTC)
Cessna 182 Skylane
The Royal Canadian Air Cadets operate six 182s, so it is true, but far too small a fleet to make it worth mentioning. - Ahunt (talk) 12:53, 9 November 2016 (UTC)
- That's what I thought the situation might be. Thanks. - BilCat (talk) 13:00, 9 November 2016 (UTC)
caravan
Come on, you're a little heavy with the revert button :) --Marc Lacoste (talk) 12:29, 13 November 2016 (UTC)
- Seriously? The Aircraft Project prefers to use the templates over tables, major airliners being the general exception. Please discuss it first. - BilCat (talk) 12:31, 13 November 2016 (UTC)
A barnstar for you!
The Civility Barnstar | |
Thank you for clearing up something I didn't know about! JustAGuyOnWikipedia (talk) 18:48, 15 November 2016 (UTC) |
IP sock puppet back at mini-14 article.
Just an FYI Springee (talk) 20:14, 20 November 2016 (UTC)
Numbers of AIP Submarines
BilCat, I'm the one that added the numbers of each submarine type to the table on the AIP Submarines page. I think that information is helpful because most of those platforms only offer AIP as an option and so I find the number using AIP helpful separate from the. There is also the distinction between those submarines that were designed for AIP from the start, and those that were retrofit. If you disagree with the format or citations let me know and I'll address them, but please don't roll back the work done to compile that information. It was all pulled from the information on the main wikipedia page for each submarine type. Thanks! -Tom — Preceding unsigned comment added by TBMilnes (talk • contribs) 20:38, 21 November 2016 (UTC)