| Revision as of 23:41, 25 November 2016 editVolunteer Marek (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers94,174 editsNo edit summary← Previous edit | Revision as of 04:06, 27 November 2016 edit undoHidden Tempo (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users1,255 editsNo edit summaryNext edit → | ||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
| {{Master Editor III}} | {{Master Editor III}} | ||
| {{Looshpah III}} | {{Looshpah III}} | ||
| ==Edit warring== | |||
| {{3RR|United States Senate election in New York, 2000}} | |||
| The article is in the topic area covered by discretionary sanctions of which you are well aware of. This means you are also aware that you should not make more than one revert per 24 hrs. Stop accusing other people of "edit warring" and demanding that they revert edits that you don't like. I began a talk page consensus discussion for my edit, which you were participating in, then felt the need to revert my edit and add your own POV edit. Rather than entrench yourself further in hypocritical edits, stop harassing other contributors, and feel free to participate in talk page discussions (provided you are able to follow ] and ]). | |||
| ] (]) 03:53, 27 November 2016 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 04:06, 27 November 2016
Status: Arghghg!
 | This user has been on Misplaced Pages for 19 years, 8 months and 14 days. |
Master Editor III
and is entitled to display this
Bufonite Editor Star.
Edit warring
Your recent editing history at United States Senate election in New York, 2000 shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war; read about how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.
Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.
The article is in the topic area covered by discretionary sanctions of which you are well aware of. This means you are also aware that you should not make more than one revert per 24 hrs. Stop accusing other people of "edit warring" and demanding that they revert edits that you don't like. I began a talk page consensus discussion for my edit, which you were participating in, then felt the need to revert my edit and add your own POV edit. Rather than entrench yourself further in hypocritical edits, stop harassing other contributors, and feel free to participate in talk page discussions (provided you are able to follow WP:CIVIL and WP:AGF). Volunteer Marek (talk) 03:53, 27 November 2016 (UTC)