| Revision as of 01:38, 8 December 2016 editMaxBrowne (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Rollbackers7,944 edits sig← Previous edit | Revision as of 09:00, 8 December 2016 edit undoKeri (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers17,822 edits →Notice of Neutral point of view noticeboard discussion: reNext edit → | ||
| Line 22: | Line 22: | ||
| Hello, Keri. This message is being sent to inform you that there currently is a discussion at ] regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. <!--Template:NPOVN-notice--> Thank you. ] (]) 01:38, 8 December 2016 (UTC) | Hello, Keri. This message is being sent to inform you that there currently is a discussion at ] regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. <!--Template:NPOVN-notice--> Thank you. ] (]) 01:38, 8 December 2016 (UTC) | ||
| :Also ]. ] much? :D ] (]) 09:00, 8 December 2016 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 09:00, 8 December 2016
Unequal application of rules
Hi Keri, you flagged one of my comments for being uncivil, presumably because I asserted another user was ignorant. At the same time, I only said that in direct responding to a user who insulted me. Are you also going to remove his comments? It is unclear why mine would be removed but his would not. MHP Huck (talk) 18:54, 18 November 2016 (UTC)
- Your comment was directed at a specific editor, calling them an idiot. That is a personal attack. Flap zappa's sweeping rudeness towards "so many snowflakes" may have been ill-mannered but was not directed at a particular editor. Keri (talk) 20:00, 18 November 2016 (UTC)
- Let's be specific. I called him ignorant - which he was objectively by his sweeping generalization which was directed at me. I did not, however, call him an idiot. Since his generalization was clearly insulting and directed at me, I think you've shown bias here. MHP Huck (talk) 20:29, 18 November 2016 (UTC)
- Quote: "man... you are an idiot" (my emphasis). I suggest you stop wasting my time with your battleground behaviour. Keri (talk) 20:34, 18 November 2016 (UTC)
- Let's be specific. I called him ignorant - which he was objectively by his sweeping generalization which was directed at me. I did not, however, call him an idiot. Since his generalization was clearly insulting and directed at me, I think you've shown bias here. MHP Huck (talk) 20:29, 18 November 2016 (UTC)
ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!
Hello, Keri. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Misplaced Pages arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
Notice of Neutral point of view noticeboard discussion
Hello, Keri. This message is being sent to inform you that there currently is a discussion at Misplaced Pages:Neutral point of view/Noticeboard regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. MaxBrowne (talk) 01:38, 8 December 2016 (UTC)