Revision as of 23:56, 9 December 2016 editHijiri88 (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users37,390 editsNo edit summary← Previous edit | Revision as of 03:31, 10 December 2016 edit undoJunosoon (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users2,316 editsNo edit summaryNext edit → | ||
Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
*''' Delete''' . All of the contents are already covered, in BLP of ], nothing new about this article to be separate, it is a mere replica copy and paste from main article ]. ] (]) 08:09, 9 December 2016 (UTC) | *''' Delete''' . All of the contents are already covered, in BLP of ], nothing new about this article to be separate, it is a mere replica copy and paste from main article ]. ] (]) 08:09, 9 December 2016 (UTC) | ||
::<small>{{ping|Junosoon}} It's not generally a good idea to post a separate "delete" !vote in addition to nominating the article for deletion in the first place, as it's assumed you are in favour of deleting unless you state otherwise. It's an especially bad idea to post your duplicate !vote below after others have already !voted, so I have moved your !vote up here. I hope you don't mind. ] (<small>]]</small>) 12:27, 9 December 2016 (UTC)</small> | ::<small>{{ping|Junosoon}} It's not generally a good idea to post a separate "delete" !vote in addition to nominating the article for deletion in the first place, as it's assumed you are in favour of deleting unless you state otherwise. It's an especially bad idea to post your duplicate !vote below after others have already !voted, so I have moved your !vote up here. I hope you don't mind. ] (<small>]]</small>) 12:27, 9 December 2016 (UTC)</small> | ||
:::{{ping|Hijiri88}} I wish I could have edited the article to make it better, but it seems other editors are not very comfortable, after receiving this alert message on my talk page .. ] (]) 03:30, 10 December 2016 (UTC) | |||
*'''Comment''' :''Concern'': The Prime Minister of India, has a personal website , writing articles, even unknowingly, related on his policies, is nothing but next to ] of his policies, .] (]) 15:08, 9 December 2016 (UTC) | *'''Comment''' :''Concern'': The Prime Minister of India, has a personal website , writing articles, even unknowingly, related on his policies, is nothing but next to ] of his policies, .] (]) 15:08, 9 December 2016 (UTC) | ||
::{{re|Junosoon}} Nonsense. If you think the article has POV problems, edit the article to fix them. And if, as you say, it is a copy-paste fork of the main Modi article, then deleting this article wouldn't solve the POV problem anyway. As several others have already pointed out, there are an abundance of articles of this type, and those are never accused of being POVFORKs. Additionally, please stop posting "'''Comment'''"s and !votes at the bottom of the AFD. that make it look at a glance like your proposal has received support from anyone other than you. If you want to reply to someone else, use proper indentation or otherwise indicate to whom you are replying. ] (<small>]]</small>) 23:56, 9 December 2016 (UTC) | ::{{re|Junosoon}} Nonsense. If you think the article has POV problems, edit the article to fix them. And if, as you say, it is a copy-paste fork of the main Modi article, then deleting this article wouldn't solve the POV problem anyway. As several others have already pointed out, there are an abundance of articles of this type, and those are never accused of being POVFORKs. Additionally, please stop posting "'''Comment'''"s and !votes at the bottom of the AFD. that make it look at a glance like your proposal has received support from anyone other than you. If you want to reply to someone else, use proper indentation or otherwise indicate to whom you are replying. ] (<small>]]</small>) 23:56, 9 December 2016 (UTC) |
Revision as of 03:31, 10 December 2016
Premiership of Narendra Modi
- Premiership of Narendra Modi (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
The current article is content forking of main article Narendra Modi with nothing new to be separate article, written in a WP:PROMOTION of Narendra Modi policies, as the Premiership of Narendra Modi lacks WP:NOTABILITY for a standalone article. Junosoon (talk) 10:07, 9 December 2016 (UTC)
- Delete . All of the contents are already covered, in BLP of Narendra Modi, nothing new about this article to be separate, it is a mere replica copy and paste from main article Narendra Modi. Junosoon (talk) 08:09, 9 December 2016 (UTC)
- @Junosoon: It's not generally a good idea to post a separate "delete" !vote in addition to nominating the article for deletion in the first place, as it's assumed you are in favour of deleting unless you state otherwise. It's an especially bad idea to post your duplicate !vote below after others have already !voted, so I have moved your !vote up here. I hope you don't mind. Hijiri 88 (聖やや) 12:27, 9 December 2016 (UTC)
- @Hijiri88: I wish I could have edited the article to make it better, but it seems other editors are not very comfortable, after receiving this alert message on my talk page .. Junosoon (talk) 03:30, 10 December 2016 (UTC)
- @Junosoon: It's not generally a good idea to post a separate "delete" !vote in addition to nominating the article for deletion in the first place, as it's assumed you are in favour of deleting unless you state otherwise. It's an especially bad idea to post your duplicate !vote below after others have already !voted, so I have moved your !vote up here. I hope you don't mind. Hijiri 88 (聖やや) 12:27, 9 December 2016 (UTC)
- Comment :Concern: The Prime Minister of India, has a personal website , writing articles, even unknowingly, related on his policies, is nothing but next to WP:PROMOTION of his policies, .Junosoon (talk) 15:08, 9 December 2016 (UTC)
- @Junosoon: Nonsense. If you think the article has POV problems, edit the article to fix them. And if, as you say, it is a copy-paste fork of the main Modi article, then deleting this article wouldn't solve the POV problem anyway. As several others have already pointed out, there are an abundance of articles of this type, and those are never accused of being POVFORKs. Additionally, please stop posting "Comment"s and !votes at the bottom of the AFD. that make it look at a glance like your proposal has received support from anyone other than you. If you want to reply to someone else, use proper indentation or otherwise indicate to whom you are replying. Hijiri 88 (聖やや) 23:56, 9 December 2016 (UTC)
- Speedy keep. This is a borderline disruptive AfD. This is a perfectly acceptable spinoff article, in line with WP:SPINOFF, the relevant guideline. The nomination indicates a lack of competence, and a failure to read the guideline that is used in the rationale. Vanamonde (talk) 06:35, 9 December 2016 (UTC)
- Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Log/2016 December 9. —Talk to my owner:Online 06:56, 9 December 2016 (UTC)
- Speedy keep. It is a content fork, as Vanamonde93 has pointed out. The suggestion for the fork was made and discussed at Talk:Narendra Modi. I believe it is the right thing to do in this situation. In fact, "Premiership of X" or "Presidency of Y" articles are quite common on Misplaced Pages. -- Kautilya3 (talk) 09:28, 9 December 2016 (UTC)
- Speedy keep Subject is as close to "intrinsically notable" as we could want. We have articles on the premierships of like six British PMs and the presidencies of I don't even wanna count how many POTI. The only reason not to have equivalent articles for the PMs of the second largest country on the planet. It would be different if Indian PMs were like, say, Japanese PMs and their premiership lasted on average around a year or if the current topic was ambiguous because Modi was serving his second or third non-consecutive term, but these simply are not the case. I was initially inclined to favour deletion in the short term because most articles I have read on Indian topics are very poorly written and a copy-paste of an article I hadn't read but had reason to assume contains grammatical errors and unsourced claims sounded like a terrible idea, but that doesn't seem to be the case here. Hijiri 88 (聖やや) 12:17, 9 December 2016 (UTC)