| Revision as of 15:09, 15 December 2016 editNeutrality (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Administrators165,431 edits →Caution: new section← Previous edit | Revision as of 15:45, 15 December 2016 edit undoTlroche (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users1,507 edits false neutrality removedNext edit → | ||
| Line 71: | Line 71: | ||
| Discretionary sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimize disruption to controversial topics. This means ] administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to the topic that do not adhere to the ], our ], or relevant ]. Administrators may impose sanctions such as ], ], or ]. This message is to notify you that sanctions are authorised for the topic you are editing. Before continuing to edit this topic, please familiarise yourself with the discretionary sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions. | Discretionary sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimize disruption to controversial topics. This means ] administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to the topic that do not adhere to the ], our ], or relevant ]. Administrators may impose sanctions such as ], ], or ]. This message is to notify you that sanctions are authorised for the topic you are editing. Before continuing to edit this topic, please familiarise yourself with the discretionary sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions. | ||
| }}{{Z33}}<!-- Derived from Template:Ds/alert --> ] (]) 02:27, 15 December 2016 (UTC) | }}{{Z33}}<!-- Derived from Template:Ds/alert --> ] (]) 02:27, 15 December 2016 (UTC) | ||
| == Caution == | |||
| Please consider reducing your use of the word "slander" with respect to other editors—and you've made about seven in the last two days (i.e., , , , , (this one not just in the edit summary, but in your comment as well); , ). I think most would agree that using these kinds of terms repeatedly and across multiple talk pages is unhelpful, excessive, and at least on some occasions a ]. | |||
| Similarly, reverting on a content dispute and calling it is simply improper. And, re : calling another editors a member of a "rightwing cabal" who has "slandered" you, and asserting without evidence that they favor "neoconservative websites" in a ]. Saying that you "will continue to add valuable content as I see fit" seems to fly in the face of ] and our rules on ] conduct. Remember, what you conceive of as "valuable" is not necessarily what everyone conceives as "Valuable." Accusing another editor of "censorship" () is also battleground behavior. Please dial back a bit. ]<sup>]</sup> 15:09, 15 December 2016 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 15:45, 15 December 2016
Welcome!
Hello, and welcome to Misplaced Pages. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:
- How to edit a page
- Editing, policy, conduct, and structure tutorial
- Picture tutorial
- How to write a great article
- Naming conventions
- Manual of Style
- If you're ready for the complete list of Misplaced Pages documentation, there's also Misplaced Pages:Topical index.
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! By the way, you can sign your name on Talk and vote pages using three tildes, like this: ~~~. Four tildes (~~~~) produces your name and the current date. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my Talk page. Again, welcome!
Fixing a typo is very useful and reveals a certain conscientiousness, but can we expect more?
Gareth Hughes 00:52, 8 Mar 2005 (UTC)
Hi, Tlroche! I noticed that in several recent edits you have shortened lead sections to a single sentence with the motivation break long first section. From this I got the impression you are not aware of the concept "lead section" and the Misplaced Pages policy regarding it. Therefore I would ask you to read Misplaced Pages:Lead section. Hopefully this will explain why your edits, though no doubt made in good faith and defendable in some other encyclopedic system, are at odds with standard Misplaced Pages practice.
Greetings, --MWAK (talk) 16:30, 28 January 2010 (UTC)
Edits to the Liquidity Trap article - nice job!
Nice job on the liquidity trap article. Would you care to help out with the recession article? I added a couple of paragraphs but it could use an expert touch. Thanks.Farcaster (talk) 01:06, 20 June 2010 (UTC)
License tagging for File:GeneratingArakawaEGridFromArakawaAGrid.gif
Thanks for uploading File:GeneratingArakawaEGridFromArakawaAGrid.gif. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Misplaced Pages uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information; to add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Misplaced Pages.
For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Misplaced Pages:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 03:07, 7 September 2010 (UTC)
Commend
I would like to commend you on your work of the article Endgame Systems and making it less of an advert. Brofist? Phearson (talk) 03:11, 18 March 2011 (UTC)
Ayotzinapa
Hello, thank you for your interest in the 2014 Iguala mass kidnapping. I noticed that you added references from the reports that suggest that the Mexican Federal Police and the Army were involved in the incident. I moved your information to an appropriate section within the article, however, because it did not belong in the introduction. The reports of the Mexican Federal Police and the Army being involved in the mass abduction is still a minority viewpoint. Proceso and the University of California at Berkeley were the ones that did the investigation, but it is not part of the mainstream viewpoint of what really happened. If this perspective is included, than the government's response to the investigation should be included too. Just thought I should let you know. Thanks and happy editing. ComputerJA (☎ • ✎) 18:33, 6 January 2015 (UTC)
Interestingly, as of 23 Jan 2016, my information is back in the introduction, with 12 cites! It seems to have become a "mainstream viewpoint" :-) Tlroche (talk) 03:04, 24 January 2016 (UTC)
ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Misplaced Pages arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:58, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
Teahouse talkback: you've got messages!
Please note that all old questions are archived after 2-3 days of inactivity. Message added by Joseph2302 (talk) 21:55, 5 July 2016 (UTC). (You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{teahouse talkback}} template.
Tsett listed at Redirects for discussion
I have asked for a discussion to address the redirect Tsett. Since you created the Tsett redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion. Gorobay (talk) 13:38, 1 November 2016 (UTC)
ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!
Hello, Tlroche. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Misplaced Pages arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
Discretionary sanctions alert
This message contains important information about an administrative situation on Misplaced Pages. It does not imply any misconduct regarding your own contributions to date.
Please carefully read this information:
The Arbitration Committee has authorised discretionary sanctions to be used for pages regarding all edits about, and all pages related to post-1932 politics of the United States and closely related people, a topic which you have edited. The Committee's decision is here.
Discretionary sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimize disruption to controversial topics. This means uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to the topic that do not adhere to the purpose of Misplaced Pages, our standards of behavior, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks. This message is to notify you that sanctions are authorised for the topic you are editing. Before continuing to edit this topic, please familiarise yourself with the discretionary sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.Template:Z33 Sagecandor (talk) 02:27, 15 December 2016 (UTC)