| Revision as of 18:37, 17 December 2016 editHuon (talk | contribs)Administrators51,328 edits →PROD: reply← Previous edit | Revision as of 18:39, 17 December 2016 edit undo1Wiki8Q5G7FviTHBac3dx8HhdNYwDVstR (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users8,314 edits rNext edit → | ||
| Line 24: | Line 24: | ||
| :I don't know what you are trying to say, but whatever your POINT is, I don't understand. Also, you attempts at reading my mind are unwelcome. Good day sir/madam. -- ] (]) 14:56, 17 December 2016 (UTC) | :I don't know what you are trying to say, but whatever your POINT is, I don't understand. Also, you attempts at reading my mind are unwelcome. Good day sir/madam. -- ] (]) 14:56, 17 December 2016 (UTC) | ||
| :I asked you to explain your rationale because I don't want to have to rely on mind-reading to understand what you're trying to achieve. The lack of an explanation is noted. Thus I'll have to continue to rely on what it looks like to me from the outside. ] (]) 18:37, 17 December 2016 (UTC) | :I asked you to explain your rationale because I don't want to have to rely on mind-reading to understand what you're trying to achieve. The lack of an explanation is noted. Thus I'll have to continue to rely on what it looks like to me from the outside. ] (]) 18:37, 17 December 2016 (UTC) | ||
| ::Have fun! -- ] (]) 18:39, 17 December 2016 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 18:39, 17 December 2016
12:53:55, 14 December 2016 review of submission by Abhilashpatil
I am following this author, Yogesh Chabria but I didnn't find any wikipedia page about him. He is a motivational speaker at many conferences and has best seller investing book series published by CNBC and Netwrok 18. Also, he is an entrepreneur himself.
I think he is really an inspiration for many. Please let me know why his page cannot be published.
Thanks, Abhilash
- Hi. The draft was reviewed by another editor, maybe they can give some guidance. You may post a message on their talk page to ask them. -- 1Wiki8........................... (talk) 17:46, 16 December 2016 (UTC)
PROD
You seem to be de-prodding quite a few company articles. While the requirements for de-prodding something are intentionally low, this seems like an attempt to de facto make company articles exempt from PROD entirely. For example, can you explain why something you seem to agree should be speedily deleted should be de-prodded except to make a point about process? Huon (talk) 10:54, 17 December 2016 (UTC)
- I don't know what you are trying to say, but whatever your POINT is, I don't understand. Also, you attempts at reading my mind are unwelcome. Good day sir/madam. -- 1Wiki8........................... (talk) 14:56, 17 December 2016 (UTC)
- I asked you to explain your rationale because I don't want to have to rely on mind-reading to understand what you're trying to achieve. The lack of an explanation is noted. Thus I'll have to continue to rely on what it looks like to me from the outside. Huon (talk) 18:37, 17 December 2016 (UTC)
- Have fun! -- 1Wiki8........................... (talk) 18:39, 17 December 2016 (UTC)