| Revision as of 14:27, 23 January 2017 editMYS77 (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users95,721 edits →Mitroglou: new section← Previous edit | Revision as of 18:48, 23 January 2017 edit undoGiantSnowman (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Administrators601,030 edits →Blocked: new sectionNext edit → | ||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
| I think the first one is, but the second one isn't. I'm not sure <u>what</u> makes them notable, I think it would be better to ask at ]. Cheers, ]] ] 14:27, 23 January 2017 (UTC) | I think the first one is, but the second one isn't. I'm not sure <u>what</u> makes them notable, I think it would be better to ask at ]. Cheers, ]] ] 14:27, 23 January 2017 (UTC) | ||
| == Blocked == | |||
| <div class="user-block" style="min-height: 40px"> ] You have been ''']''' from editing for a period of '''1 week''' for ]. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to ]. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may ] by first reading the ], then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: <!-- Copy the text as it appears on your page, not as it appears in this edit area. Do not include the "tlx|" code. -->{{tlx|unblock|2=reason=''Your reason here ~~~~''}}. </div><!-- Template:uw-block --> | |||
| I've given you the benefit of the doubt for far too long. But your recent escalation of bitty, disruptive editing has culminated in , which is not only you removing sourced content (something I have warned you about previously) but also demonstrating your battleground mentality by blindly reverting an editor with whom you have had a long-running dispute. ]] 18:48, 23 January 2017 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 18:48, 23 January 2017
Mitroglou
I think the first one is, but the second one isn't. I'm not sure what makes them notable, I think it would be better to ask at WT:FOOTY. Cheers, MYS77 14:27, 23 January 2017 (UTC)
Blocked
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.
I've given you the benefit of the doubt for far too long. But your recent escalation of bitty, disruptive editing has culminated in this, which is not only you removing sourced content (something I have warned you about previously) but also demonstrating your battleground mentality by blindly reverting an editor with whom you have had a long-running dispute. GiantSnowman 18:48, 23 January 2017 (UTC)