| Revision as of 11:33, 29 January 2017 editClueBot NG (talk | contribs)Bots, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers6,439,049 edits Warning D.H.110 - #1← Previous edit | Revision as of 02:19, 30 January 2017 edit undoMShabazz (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers8,606 edits →Black Lives Matter: new sectionNext edit → | ||
| Line 26: | Line 26: | ||
| * The following is the log entry regarding this message: ] was by ] ] ] ANN scored at 0.963683 on 2017-01-29T11:33:40+00:00 <!-- MySQL ID: 2914780 -->. | * The following is the log entry regarding this message: ] was by ] ] ] ANN scored at 0.963683 on 2017-01-29T11:33:40+00:00 <!-- MySQL ID: 2914780 -->. | ||
| Thank you. <!-- Template:uw-cluebotwarning1 --><!-- Template:uw-vandalism1 --> ] (]) 11:33, 29 January 2017 (UTC) | Thank you. <!-- Template:uw-cluebotwarning1 --><!-- Template:uw-vandalism1 --> ] (]) 11:33, 29 January 2017 (UTC) | ||
| == ] == | |||
| ] Your recent editing history at ] shows that you are currently engaged in an ]. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the ] to work toward making a version that represents ] among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See ] for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant ] or seek ]. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary ]. | |||
| '''Being involved in an edit war can result in your being ]'''—especially if you violate the ], which states that an editor must not perform more than three ] on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—'''even if you don't violate the three-revert rule'''—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.<!-- Template:uw-3rr --> — ] <sup>]</sup>/<sub>]</sub> 02:19, 30 January 2017 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 02:19, 30 January 2017
D.H.110, you are invited to the Teahouse!
|
Hi D.H.110! Thanks for contributing to Misplaced Pages. Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts 16:06, 24 January 2017 (UTC) |
January 2017
Hello, and welcome to Misplaced Pages. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Black Lives Matter has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.
- ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
- For help, take a look at the introduction.
- The following is the log entry regarding this message: Black Lives Matter was changed by D.H.110 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.963683 on 2017-01-29T11:33:40+00:00 .
Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 11:33, 29 January 2017 (UTC)
Black Lives Matter
Your recent editing history at Black Lives Matter shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.
Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. — MShabazz /Stalk 02:19, 30 January 2017 (UTC)