| Revision as of 08:16, 5 February 2017 editVolunteer Marek (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers94,120 edits →discretionary sanction: new sectionTag: contentious topics alert← Previous edit | Revision as of 21:41, 5 February 2017 edit undoBlueSalix (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users7,446 edits →discretionary sanctionNext edit → | ||
| Line 100: | Line 100: | ||
| I don't know if you've been notified previously or not, but you're violating DS restrictions left and right on the Russian interference page.] (]) 08:16, 5 February 2017 (UTC) | I don't know if you've been notified previously or not, but you're violating DS restrictions left and right on the Russian interference page.] (]) 08:16, 5 February 2017 (UTC) | ||
| :Yeah, actually, no I'm not. But templating regulars in reference to a DS article probably is a DS violation. ] (]) | |||
Revision as of 21:41, 5 February 2017
Shouldn't we all be concerned
I hope we can all agree foreign meddling in another country's elections is not a good thing. Shouldn't we all be equally concerned about that, regardless of political party or point-of-view. Next time, the winds may change and they could try to influence the results for the other party. Sagecandor (talk) 09:48, 11 December 2016 (UTC)
- I generally agree - the U.S. should stop meddling in other countries elections like Iran, Venezuela, etc. That said, I'm not here for cyber-activism, I'm here to edit articles to a NPOV standard and my record removing right-wing hogwash like this is unimpeachable. It's very clear you're not going to be with us much longer before the sock investigations get you, but please keep your doe-eyed crusading platitudes off my Talk page for whatever time you have left. Just think - three months from now when this meme has evaporated and the spotlight turns elsewhere, everything you've added here will be promptly trashed. Fourteen hours a day for a month, all wasted. BlueSalix (talk) 09:53, 11 December 2016 (UTC)
- I happen to agree with you about all parties meddling in other countries elections including those you mentioned. I didn't mean for my post to come across as doe-eyed crusading platitudes, and I'm sorry if you felt it came across to you that way. I hope and believe that all of our research to Misplaced Pages remains to some extent or another once we all depart this realm hopefully after a good long happy life. I truly wish you well and I'm sorry if we got off on the wrong foot, BlueSalix. I'd like to be able to collaborate with you in a better more good faith tone in the future. Sagecandor (talk) 10:00, 11 December 2016 (UTC)
- FYI, Sagecandor, I am what you would probably describe as "Anti-American." However, I am not an Anti-America SPA and I always fully embrace NPOV. In short, I am not here as an activist, or to right the wrongs in the world, because that's not what WP is for. It's completely WP:NOTHERE for you to solicit other editors opinions on what you're calling "foreign meddling in another country's elections." Leave your politics at the door and don't try to drum-up support based on your personal moral outrage about current events. I really don't care about current events in America at all, which probably makes me uniquely qualified to edit about them. BlueSalix (talk) 10:36, 11 December 2016 (UTC)
- I'm sorry you felt I was trying to solicit opinions, I was not. I was trying to make a good faith effort to reach out to you. You yourself said "I generally agree - the U.S. should stop meddling in other countries elections like Iran, Venezuela, etc." And I agreed with you about that. I'd like to be able to move forward with you, BlueSalix, and work better together with a better tone for both of us. Sagecandor (talk) 10:39, 11 December 2016 (UTC)
- (1) I appreciate your attempts to professionalize your appearance from your persona's earlier edit history of a few weeks ago by using, what we in the biz call, "coherent bargaining" layered with a dripping level of niceness. And, I think this is probably an effective approach for you to use on those who have not carefully reviewed your prior edits.
- (2) I don't care if you agree or disagree with me. For the final time, the intersection or divergence of our political beliefs is irrelevant to WP.
- You're not bringing anything to the table here, so at this time I'll have to ask you stop posting to my Talk page indefinitely. BlueSalix (talk) 10:46, 11 December 2016 (UTC)
- Okay will do. Sorry we couldn't work something out. I'll try to be more gracious to you in the future. Have a good day and wishing you and yours health and happiness for the holiday season. Sagecandor (talk) 10:48, 11 December 2016 (UTC)
- Give it a rest. I've told you I'm not interested in the "golly, gee whiz!" / First Day at Bible Camp act. And you'll discover (or, more likely, rediscover) there are only a handful of editors here dumb enough to fall for it. BlueSalix (talk) 10:52, 11 December 2016 (UTC)
- Okay will do. Sorry we couldn't work something out. I'll try to be more gracious to you in the future. Have a good day and wishing you and yours health and happiness for the holiday season. Sagecandor (talk) 10:48, 11 December 2016 (UTC)
- I'm sorry you felt I was trying to solicit opinions, I was not. I was trying to make a good faith effort to reach out to you. You yourself said "I generally agree - the U.S. should stop meddling in other countries elections like Iran, Venezuela, etc." And I agreed with you about that. I'd like to be able to move forward with you, BlueSalix, and work better together with a better tone for both of us. Sagecandor (talk) 10:39, 11 December 2016 (UTC)
- FYI, Sagecandor, I am what you would probably describe as "Anti-American." However, I am not an Anti-America SPA and I always fully embrace NPOV. In short, I am not here as an activist, or to right the wrongs in the world, because that's not what WP is for. It's completely WP:NOTHERE for you to solicit other editors opinions on what you're calling "foreign meddling in another country's elections." Leave your politics at the door and don't try to drum-up support based on your personal moral outrage about current events. I really don't care about current events in America at all, which probably makes me uniquely qualified to edit about them. BlueSalix (talk) 10:36, 11 December 2016 (UTC)
- I happen to agree with you about all parties meddling in other countries elections including those you mentioned. I didn't mean for my post to come across as doe-eyed crusading platitudes, and I'm sorry if you felt it came across to you that way. I hope and believe that all of our research to Misplaced Pages remains to some extent or another once we all depart this realm hopefully after a good long happy life. I truly wish you well and I'm sorry if we got off on the wrong foot, BlueSalix. I'd like to be able to collaborate with you in a better more good faith tone in the future. Sagecandor (talk) 10:00, 11 December 2016 (UTC)
Please comment on Talk:Alice Corp. v. CLS Bank International
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Alice Corp. v. CLS Bank International. Legobot (talk) 04:23, 12 December 2016 (UTC)
Nomination of American influence in the Honduran general election, 2009 for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article American influence in the Honduran general election, 2009 is suitable for inclusion in Misplaced Pages according to Misplaced Pages's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/American influence in the Honduran general election, 2009 until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. - MrX 20:45, 12 December 2016 (UTC)
A reminder of DS
You were provided formal notice of DS on American politics in the last year, here.
The inappropriateness of this comment was pointed out to you already here by one editor and here by another. Yet that remark and others are still there at the AfD, not struck out.
Giving you another chance to fly right on this controversial topic; you are very close to being brought to AE already. Jytdog (talk) 19:30, 14 December 2016 (UTC)
- Good luck with that, Jytdog! BlueSalix (talk) 22:40, 16 December 2016 (UTC)
Please comment on Talk:Lee Harvey Oswald
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Lee Harvey Oswald. Legobot (talk) 04:23, 15 December 2016 (UTC)
Please comment on Talk:2016 South Korean protests
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:2016 South Korean protests. Legobot (talk) 04:23, 18 December 2016 (UTC)
Please comment on Talk:Frank Gaffney
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Frank Gaffney. Legobot (talk) 04:23, 23 December 2016 (UTC)
Please comment on Talk:United States presidential election, 2016
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:United States presidential election, 2016. Legobot (talk) 04:26, 28 December 2016 (UTC)
Please comment on Talk:Donald Trump
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Donald Trump. Legobot (talk) 04:23, 1 January 2017 (UTC)
Please comment on Talk:Thomas Mair (murderer)
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Thomas Mair (murderer). Legobot (talk) 04:23, 4 January 2017 (UTC)
Please comment on Talk:Richard Tomlins
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Richard Tomlins. Legobot (talk) 04:24, 8 January 2017 (UTC)
Please comment on Talk:Anatole Klyosov
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Anatole Klyosov. Legobot (talk) 04:23, 13 January 2017 (UTC)
Please comment on Talk:Carrie Fisher
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Carrie Fisher. Legobot (talk) 04:23, 17 January 2017 (UTC)
Please comment on Talk:Dublin Regulation
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Dublin Regulation. Legobot (talk) 04:26, 22 January 2017 (UTC)
Please comment on Talk:Tony Blair
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Tony Blair. Legobot (talk) 04:23, 24 January 2017 (UTC)
Please comment on Talk:Rafael Díez de la Cortina y Olaeta
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Rafael Díez de la Cortina y Olaeta. Legobot (talk) 04:23, 27 January 2017 (UTC)
Please comment on Misplaced Pages talk:WikiProject Beauty Pageants
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Misplaced Pages talk:WikiProject Beauty Pageants. Legobot (talk) 04:23, 31 January 2017 (UTC)
Please comment on Talk:Tomas Gorny
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Tomas Gorny. Legobot (talk) 04:24, 5 February 2017 (UTC)
discretionary sanction
This message contains important information about an administrative situation on Misplaced Pages. It does not imply any misconduct regarding your own contributions to date.
Please carefully read this information:
The Arbitration Committee has authorised discretionary sanctions to be used for pages regarding all edits about, and all pages related to post-1932 politics of the United States and closely related people, a topic which you have edited. The Committee's decision is here.
Discretionary sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimize disruption to controversial topics. This means uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to the topic that do not adhere to the purpose of Misplaced Pages, our standards of behavior, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks. This message is to notify you that sanctions are authorised for the topic you are editing. Before continuing to edit this topic, please familiarise yourself with the discretionary sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.I don't know if you've been notified previously or not, but you're violating DS restrictions left and right on the Russian interference page.Volunteer Marek (talk) 08:16, 5 February 2017 (UTC)