Misplaced Pages

Revision as of 23:00, 8 February 2017

Copyright violation in Healthcare medicine institute

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Healthcare medicine institute, by another Misplaced Pages user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Misplaced Pages. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Healthcare medicine institute is unquestionably copyright infringement, and no assertion of permission has been made.

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Healthcare medicine institute, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. To see the user who deleted the page, click here CSDWarnBot (talk) 05:30, 9 January 2008 (UTC)

I take issue with "unquestionably copyright infringement". Actually, no infringement whatsoever ocurred. The CEO of the company gave me the right to post.

I think I may not know enough about Misplaced Pages to contribute. I seem to need to learn more about the system as not to offend the bots and will not contribute until such a time that I learn more about referencing and identification of white hat material. The bots have caused some trouble unessarily. I understand, but the No Follow policy should invalidate the penalty box concept.

Notability of Healthcare Medicine Institute

A tag has been placed on Healthcare Medicine Institute requesting that it be speedily deleted from Misplaced Pages. This has been done because the article appears to be about a real person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable. If this is the first page that you have created, then you should read the guide to writing your first article.

If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Misplaced Pages guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Ubardak (talk) 09:19, 8 February 2008 (UTC)

Your recent edits

Hello and welcome to Misplaced Pages. When you add content to talk pages and Misplaced Pages pages that have open discussion, please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:

1. Add four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment; or
2. With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button ( or ) located above the edit window.

This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.

Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 17:23, 21 May 2013 (UTC)

May 2013

Your recent editing history at Acupuncture shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. TippyGoomba (talk) 05:08, 22 May 2013 (UTC)

Suggestion

Hi, I have followed your discussions at Acupuncture, thought I would give you my 2 cents....feel free to delete if you do not like my advice. Please also see my comment here at the acupuncture talk page. Misplaced Pages policy dictates that the lead should summarize the body of the article. Most of your edits seem to be only to the lead. If you are so inclined to improve the acupuncture article, I would suggest updating the body of the article first with any research that is discussed in relevant secondary sources. The body of the article here currently only mentions that there is no physical correlates with acupuncture points! Thus, the lead is currently a good summary of this. I have listed a bunch of secondary sources on the talk page that discuss this topic and discuss some preliminary research that suggests differences along meridians, etc. If there is anything worth being incorporated into the body of the article, then it should be done first and the lead can be modified afterwards to reflect this. If you approach the lead first, it is hard to get consensus and is not consistent with policy. Best regards Puhlaa (talk) 20:08, 22 May 2013 (UTC)

If you feel so inclined, here are some secondary sources that could be used to add relevant text to this section of body of the article:

• Electrical PropertiesofAcupuncture Points and Meridians: A Systematic Review
• Electrical Characterization of Acupuncture Points: Technical Issues and Challenges Ahn 2007
• Characterizing Acupuncture Stimuli Using Brain Imaging with fMRI - A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of the Literature Huang et al 2012
• How do acupuncture and moxibustion act? - Focusing on the progress in Japanese acupuncture research Kawakita et al. 2006
• Neuroanatomical basis of acupuncture treatment for some common illnesses Cheng 2009

Puhlaa (talk) 20:20, 22 May 2013 (UTC)

I replied to you at my talk page. Regards Puhlaa (talk) 04:43, 23 May 2013 (UTC)

Your message

Hi, just wanted to let you know I replied to your message on my talk page. Also, please check your email. --Middle 8 (talk) 06:52, 28 May 2013 (UTC)

Notification

The Arbitration Committee has authorised discretionary sanctions to be used for pages regarding pseudoscience and fringe science, a topic which you have edited. The Committee's decision is here.

Discretionary sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimize disruption to controversial topics. This means uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to the topic that do not adhere to the purpose of Misplaced Pages, our standards of behavior, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks. This message is to notify you sanctions are authorised for the topic you are editing. Before continuing to edit this topic, please familiarise yourself with the discretionary sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.

Template:Z33 QuackGuru (talk) 19:37, 25 July 2014 (UTC)

Reminder

This is a formal reminder that discretionary sanctions continue to apply in the area of acupuncture articles.

Please carefully read this information:

The Arbitration Committee has authorised discretionary sanctions to be used for pages regarding Complementary and Alternative Medicine, a topic which you have edited. The Committee's decision is here.

Template:Z33 TenOfAllTrades(talk) 23:00, 8 February 2017 (UTC)