| Revision as of 01:51, 26 February 2017 editCEngelbrecht2 (talk | contribs)262 edits →Topic ban warning← Previous edit | Revision as of 13:17, 26 February 2017 edit undo74.70.146.1 (talk) →ANI: new sectionNext edit → | ||
| Line 26: | Line 26: | ||
| ::::OK, I'll take care of it tomorrow. Sure you can have the same e-mail address, just add it in your preferences in the usual way. ] | ] 23:27, 25 February 2017 (UTC). | ::::OK, I'll take care of it tomorrow. Sure you can have the same e-mail address, just add it in your preferences in the usual way. ] | ] 23:27, 25 February 2017 (UTC). | ||
| :::::All right, cheers. ] (]) 01:51, 26 February 2017 (UTC) | :::::All right, cheers. ] (]) 01:51, 26 February 2017 (UTC) | ||
| == ANI == | |||
| ] There is currently a discussion at ] regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. <!--Template:ANI-notice--> | |||
| ] (]) 13:17, 26 February 2017 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 13:17, 26 February 2017
Sock
This account appears to be a sock of CEngelbrecht. What's going on? Alexbrn (talk) 12:46, 23 February 2017 (UTC)
(Add) and are you also Aquapess? Alexbrn (talk) 08:38, 24 February 2017 (UTC)
- No, I'm not Aquapess. If I just add a '2' to a dungeoned username, would I really be using other clandestine accounts? Fuck me, that there are more than one person out there thinking, that the waterside idea is being raped by Academia. What a world, what a world. CEngelbrecht2 (talk) 11:11, 24 February 2017 (UTC)
- Couldn't agree more, just because two people have a similar opinion about something, it doesnt mean they are being sock puppets!
- If you read carefully you can see that our tone and phrasing is completely different, but it seem clear to me that most things deemed pro-AAT are dismissed immediately without being actually read and considered logicallyAquapess (talk) 23:26, 24 February 2017 (UTC)
Note
This message contains important information about an administrative situation on Misplaced Pages. It does not imply any misconduct regarding your own contributions to date.
Please carefully read this information:
The Arbitration Committee has authorised discretionary sanctions to be used for pages regarding pseudoscience and fringe science, a topic which you have edited. The Committee's decision is here.
Discretionary sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimize disruption to controversial topics. This means uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to the topic that do not adhere to the purpose of Misplaced Pages, our standards of behavior, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks. This message is to notify you that sanctions are authorised for the topic you are editing. Before continuing to edit this topic, please familiarise yourself with the discretionary sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.Template:Z33 --NeilN 20:58, 23 February 2017 (UTC)
Topic ban warning
What exactly is a "dungeoned" username, per above? It's not a word I understand, in the context of something that happens on a website. User:CEngelbrecht isn't in a dungeon in the sense of being blocked. Do you mean the older account has a fairly embarrassing history, which you wanted to have less visible? (I see I blocked it twice myself in 2013.) Anyway, I'm concerned by your contributions to Talk:Aquatic ape hypothesis under this account as well. I'll consider topic banning you from the article if you don't let up with the personal attacks, the relentless repetitiusness, and the nasty tone. Your talk of "raping the rules" and "being raped by academic stupidity" is offensive. So is aggressively calling people "darling" and groundlessly accusing them of bad-faith editing and "censorship". Don't call them "mate" or "lad" either. Those words might sound friendly in a totally different context, but in your hostile posts they sound more like you're condescending to inferiors. Do you see anybody else addressing you like that? Drop it. Bishonen | talk 18:35, 25 February 2017 (UTC).
- You ever tried being a Giordano Bruno? CEngelbrecht2 (talk) 19:48, 25 February 2017 (UTC)
- Couldn't log on to CEngelbrecht for years, untill I tried just now. I think somebody just unlocked it. CEngelbrecht2 (talk) 20:09, 25 February 2017 (UTC)
- Really? It was last blocked in September 2013, for one week only. See the block log here. You used it up to January 2014, see the contributions here. Would you like me to block it? That's a serious offer. I assume you don't intend to use both accounts — you'd be in trouble if you did — and CEngelbrecht2 is the most recent one, with a good long gap between them, so should preferably be used from now on. Bishonen | talk 21:44, 25 February 2017 (UTC).
- I'm serious, I haven't been able to log on to '1' before just now. Requesting a password sent to my mail address also came up empty. I tried all of that before I created '2' a week ago (in my indignation of another big round of vandalism against the aquatic article).
- But there's no point in having more than one, so go ahead and close '1'. (Can I then link my mail address to '2'?) CEngelbrecht2 (talk) 22:43, 25 February 2017 (UTC)
- OK, I'll take care of it tomorrow. Sure you can have the same e-mail address, just add it in your preferences in the usual way. Bishonen | talk 23:27, 25 February 2017 (UTC).
- All right, cheers. CEngelbrecht2 (talk) 01:51, 26 February 2017 (UTC)
- OK, I'll take care of it tomorrow. Sure you can have the same e-mail address, just add it in your preferences in the usual way. Bishonen | talk 23:27, 25 February 2017 (UTC).
- Really? It was last blocked in September 2013, for one week only. See the block log here. You used it up to January 2014, see the contributions here. Would you like me to block it? That's a serious offer. I assume you don't intend to use both accounts — you'd be in trouble if you did — and CEngelbrecht2 is the most recent one, with a good long gap between them, so should preferably be used from now on. Bishonen | talk 21:44, 25 February 2017 (UTC).
ANI
There is currently a discussion at Misplaced Pages:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved.