Misplaced Pages

User talk:Giano II: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 19:05, 22 September 2006 editGhirlandajo (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers89,657 edits →Arbitration case: ArbCom mailing list decides it all...← Previous edit Revision as of 23:50, 22 September 2006 edit undoInkSplotch (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users821 edits →Arbitration caseNext edit →
Line 13: Line 13:
An arbitration case has been submitted to review the actions surround the recent Giano case on AN. I've listed you as an involved party, and you may wish to view the case ]. --] 18:04, 22 September 2006 (UTC) An arbitration case has been submitted to review the actions surround the recent Giano case on AN. I've listed you as an involved party, and you may wish to view the case ]. --] 18:04, 22 September 2006 (UTC)
:You wouldn't believe me, Giano, but I expected repraisals from minute to minute all day long. I may imagine their panic after you returned to normal editing today. Now there's gonna be a huge bazaar... --<font color="FC4339">]</font> <sup><font color="C98726">]</font></sup> 19:05, 22 September 2006 (UTC) :You wouldn't believe me, Giano, but I expected repraisals from minute to minute all day long. I may imagine their panic after you returned to normal editing today. Now there's gonna be a huge bazaar... --<font color="FC4339">]</font> <sup><font color="C98726">]</font></sup> 19:05, 22 September 2006 (UTC)
::I honestly don't know how you mean this statement. I'm not trying to launch or extend attacks on anyone, but many have wanted ArbCom to speak on their own behalf throughout this and I felt it was time. Giano, you statment is rather cryptic, and I was hoping to encourage you to express fully what you feel right now. I don't think ''anything'' is a foregone conclusion at this point (i.e., this isn't a kangaroo court), and the only way we'll be able to sort this all out is to express our views fully, in a neutral forum. --] 23:50, 22 September 2006 (UTC)

Revision as of 23:50, 22 September 2006

Old messages are at


Please leave new messages at the foot of the page

Arbitration case

An arbitration case has been submitted to review the actions surround the recent Giano case on AN. I've listed you as an involved party, and you may wish to view the case here. --InkSplotch 18:04, 22 September 2006 (UTC)

You wouldn't believe me, Giano, but I expected repraisals from minute to minute all day long. I may imagine their panic after you returned to normal editing today. Now there's gonna be a huge bazaar... --Ghirla 19:05, 22 September 2006 (UTC)
I honestly don't know how you mean this statement. I'm not trying to launch or extend attacks on anyone, but many have wanted ArbCom to speak on their own behalf throughout this and I felt it was time. Giano, you statment is rather cryptic, and I was hoping to encourage you to express fully what you feel right now. I don't think anything is a foregone conclusion at this point (i.e., this isn't a kangaroo court), and the only way we'll be able to sort this all out is to express our views fully, in a neutral forum. --InkSplotch 23:50, 22 September 2006 (UTC)