| Revision as of 00:32, 30 March 2017 editFabartus (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users21,651 edits →The problem is your revert is wrong: Its not worth the time to be politically engaged over.← Previous edit | Revision as of 00:40, 30 March 2017 edit undoFabartus (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users21,651 edits →The problem is your revert is wrong: But THAT battle was one I haven't yet decided to fight, you know!?Next edit → | ||
| Line 63: | Line 63: | ||
| :{{Ping|Fabartus}} Thank you for the heads up. The dab page ] contains 22 entries, all of which are plural. In ], I pointed out that having both '']'' and ''Blue Mountains'' dab pages is a little confusing even for English literate persons, but those for which English is a second language may find it completely befuddling. Maybe the proper course is to combine them? Unless there is some aspect I am unaware of, ]/] and ]/] have the same issue. —] (]) 21:19, 29 March 2017 (UTC) | :{{Ping|Fabartus}} Thank you for the heads up. The dab page ] contains 22 entries, all of which are plural. In ], I pointed out that having both '']'' and ''Blue Mountains'' dab pages is a little confusing even for English literate persons, but those for which English is a second language may find it completely befuddling. Maybe the proper course is to combine them? Unless there is some aspect I am unaware of, ]/] and ]/] have the same issue. —] (]) 21:19, 29 March 2017 (UTC) | ||
| ::Heh, heh. Those and many others. Actually think the issue is decades old and rooted in inconsistent policy or division inside the USGS and/or GNIS community. As a railroad buff, I acquired quite a few 1890s-1820s series USGS topo maps when they were available via some University servers years back. These are particularly valuable for showing railroading in its prime - nearly a maximum extent - but also because auto-clubs hadn't yet lobbied to create later road networks junking up the terrain. In those, these Ridge-and-Valley systems are generally labeled with Ridges, or occasionally by Mountains. Mountain Singular, I conjecture came about as an advertising side dish, like 'Lehigh Valley' and 'Delaware Valley', in announcements. Since 2004, this sort of issue generally gets limp noodle enthusiasm put to a vote, so best to resolve in a conversation like this. Its not worth the time to be politically engaged over. // <b>]</b><font color="green">]</font> 00:32, 30 March 2017 (UTC) | ::Heh, heh. Those and many others. Actually think the issue is decades old and rooted in inconsistent policy or division inside the USGS and/or GNIS community. As a railroad buff, I acquired quite a few 1890s-1820s series USGS topo maps when they were available via some University servers years back. These are particularly valuable for showing railroading in its prime - nearly a maximum extent - but also because auto-clubs hadn't yet lobbied to create later road networks junking up the terrain. In those, these Ridge-and-Valley systems are generally labeled with Ridges, or occasionally by Mountains. Mountain Singular, I conjecture came about as an advertising side dish, like 'Lehigh Valley' and 'Delaware Valley', in announcements. Since 2004, this sort of issue generally gets limp noodle enthusiasm put to a vote, so best to resolve in a conversation like this. Its not worth the time to be politically engaged over. // <b>]</b><font color="green">]</font> 00:32, 30 March 2017 (UTC) | ||
| :::On reading your and your response, I note two differences:{{bullR | |||
| }} ] - is for Australia, a world class chain, so important there as they have so few chains. (I Skype on line with a few Aussies, 16 hr diffs in schedules permitting).{{bullR | |||
| }} IMHO, the proper name for ] is not as I pipetricked it in my edit, but ] which would emphasize its cross-state extent. But THAT battle was one I haven't yet decided to fight, you know!? // <b>]</b><font color="green">]</font> 00:40, 30 March 2017 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 00:40, 30 March 2017
| My admin actions |
|---|
| Contribs • Blocks • Protects • Deletions |
| Admin links |
| Noticeboard • Incidents • AIV • 3RR |
| Backlog • Prod • AfD • Autoblocks |
| Arbitration |
| Arbitration • Noticeboard • Enforcement |
| Checkuser |
| RFCU • Clerks page • Checkuser |
| Abusive Hosts • VCN proxycheck • ippages |
| Multi-RBL lookup • DNSstuff |
| • Wannabe Kate's tool • Prefix index |
 Archives |
|
|
|
This page has archives. Sections older than 15 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 5 sections are present. |
TUSC token 9971e50bd95eab9f57319ec9a0d97086
I am now proud owner of a TUSC account where I changed my password!
Misplaced Pages Women's Health Information Edit-a-thon: Tuesday, May 12 at OHSU
You are invited!
- Tuesday, May 12, 2015: Misplaced Pages Women's Health Information Edit-a-thon – 1 to 4pm
- Misplaced Pages Edit-a-thon hosted by OHSU's Center for Women's Health in honor of National Women's Health Week
- Location: Biomedical Information Communications Center (3280 SW Sam Jackson Park Road, Portland, OR 97239)
- This edit-a-thon is intended to address some of these important differences and to generally improve women’s health information in key articles and topics. Areas for improvement have been identified in cooperation with WikiProject Medicine. Prior Misplaced Pages editing is not required; assistance will be available the day of the event. Attendees should bring their own laptops and power cords.
Hope you can make it! If you have any questions or require any special accommodations, please post to the event page.
Thanks,
To unsubscribe from this newsletter, remove your name from this list.
"Unexplained deletions"
As per consensus we don't include birth places in the (born birth date) field. CrashUnderride 20:41, 16 February 2017 (UTC)
MGM Grand Fire
Thanks for fixing my "fix"; I didn't know soffit was a real word and thought someone just misspelled socket. :) 68.156.95.34 (talk) 02:15, 13 March 2017 (UTC)
Art+Feminism @ Portland Institute for Contemporary Art (March 18, 2017)
You are invited to the upcoming Art+Feminism edit-athon, which will be held at the Portland Institute for Contemporary Art (415 Southwest 10th Avenue #300, Portland 97205) on Saturday, March 18, 2017 from 10:00am – 5:00pm. For more information, visit Eventbrite.
Hope to see you there! -MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:46, 14 March 2017 (UTC)
The problem is your revert is wrong
The problem here, where your revert is wrong is the name Blue Mountain (Singular) is inappropriate to a ridgeline with a length of 255 miles, or at least 150 miles as the crow flies. Older topo maps show it appropriately as Blue Mountain Ridge, acknowledging it has many peaks; that is also distinct from GNIS name Blue Ridge Mountain. That another disambig page Blue Mountain already includes a link to the article is to the good. Someone looking for the page can find it easier. No logically good reason two disambig pages can't link such, when the case is the difference and the problem. Kindly undo your revert, least I need to do so. // FrankB 21:00, 29 March 2017 (UTC)
- @Fabartus: Thank you for the heads up. The dab page Blue Mountains contains 22 entries, all of which are plural. In a discussion years ago, I pointed out that having both Blue Mountain and Blue Mountains dab pages is a little confusing even for English literate persons, but those for which English is a second language may find it completely befuddling. Maybe the proper course is to combine them? Unless there is some aspect I am unaware of, Black Mountain/Black Mountains and White Mountain/White Mountains have the same issue. —EncMstr (talk) 21:19, 29 March 2017 (UTC)
- Heh, heh. Those and many others. Actually think the issue is decades old and rooted in inconsistent policy or division inside the USGS and/or GNIS community. As a railroad buff, I acquired quite a few 1890s-1820s series USGS topo maps when they were available via some University servers years back. These are particularly valuable for showing railroading in its prime - nearly a maximum extent - but also because auto-clubs hadn't yet lobbied to create later road networks junking up the terrain. In those, these Ridge-and-Valley systems are generally labeled with Ridges, or occasionally by Mountains. Mountain Singular, I conjecture came about as an advertising side dish, like 'Lehigh Valley' and 'Delaware Valley', in announcements. Since 2004, this sort of issue generally gets limp noodle enthusiasm put to a vote, so best to resolve in a conversation like this. Its not worth the time to be politically engaged over. // FrankB 00:32, 30 March 2017 (UTC)
- On reading your prior discussion and your response, I note two differences:Template:BullR Blue Mountains - is for Australia, a world class chain, so important there as they have so few chains. (I Skype on line with a few Aussies, 16 hr diffs in schedules permitting).Template:BullR IMHO, the proper name for Blue Mountain (Pennsylvania) is not as I pipetricked it in my edit, but Blue Mountains, Pennsylvania which would emphasize its cross-state extent. But THAT battle was one I haven't yet decided to fight, you know!? // FrankB 00:40, 30 March 2017 (UTC)
- Heh, heh. Those and many others. Actually think the issue is decades old and rooted in inconsistent policy or division inside the USGS and/or GNIS community. As a railroad buff, I acquired quite a few 1890s-1820s series USGS topo maps when they were available via some University servers years back. These are particularly valuable for showing railroading in its prime - nearly a maximum extent - but also because auto-clubs hadn't yet lobbied to create later road networks junking up the terrain. In those, these Ridge-and-Valley systems are generally labeled with Ridges, or occasionally by Mountains. Mountain Singular, I conjecture came about as an advertising side dish, like 'Lehigh Valley' and 'Delaware Valley', in announcements. Since 2004, this sort of issue generally gets limp noodle enthusiasm put to a vote, so best to resolve in a conversation like this. Its not worth the time to be politically engaged over. // FrankB 00:32, 30 March 2017 (UTC)