Revision as of 23:29, 8 February 2017 editBG19bot (talk | contribs)1,005,055 editsm WP:CHECKWIKI error fix for #03. Missing Reflist. Do general fixes if a problem exists. -← Previous edit | Revision as of 19:27, 28 April 2017 edit undoGaipaw (talk | contribs)39 editsm changed Z to R (real cohomology)Next edit → | ||
Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
== Definition == | == Definition == | ||
Given a ] and ] manifold ''M'' of dimension 4''k'', the ] gives rise to a ] ''Q'' on the 'middle' real ] | Given a ] and ] manifold ''M'' of dimension 4''k'', the ] gives rise to a ] ''Q'' on the 'middle' real ]<math> | ||
:<math>H^{2k}(M,\mathbf{R})</math>. | |||
:''H''<sup>2''k''</sup>(''M'',''Z''). | |||
The basic identity for the cup product | The basic identity for the cup product | ||
Line 15: | Line 15: | ||
shows that with ''p'' = ''q'' = 2''k'' the product is ]. It takes values in | shows that with ''p'' = ''q'' = 2''k'' the product is ]. It takes values in | ||
:<math>H^{4k}(M,\mathbf{R})</math>. | |||
:''H''<sup>4''k''</sup>(''M'',''Z''). | |||
If we assume also that ''M'' is ], ] identifies this with | If we assume also that ''M'' is ], ] identifies this with | ||
:<math>H^{0}(M,\mathbf{R})</math> | |||
:''H''<sub>0</sub>(''M'',''Z''), | |||
which can be identified with |
which can be identified with <math>\mathbf{R}</math>. Therefore cup product, under these hypotheses, does give rise to a ] on ''H''<sup>2''k''</sup>(''M'',''R''); and therefore to a quadratic form ''Q''. The form ''Q'' is ] due to Poincaré duality, as it pairs non-degenerately with itself.<ref>{{cite book|last1=Hatcher|first1=Allen|title=Algebraic topology|date=2003|publisher=Cambridge Univ. Pr.|location=Cambridge|isbn=978-0521795401|page=250|edition=Repr.|url=https://www.math.cornell.edu/~hatcher/AT/AT.pdf|accessdate=8 January 2017|language=en}}</ref> More generally, the signature can be defined in this way for any general compact ] with ''4n''-dimensional Poincaré duality. | ||
The '''signature''' of ''M'' is by definition the ] of ''Q'', an ordered triple according to its definition. If ''M'' is not connected, its signature is defined to be the sum of the signatures of its connected components. | The '''signature''' of ''M'' is by definition the ] of ''Q'', an ordered triple according to its definition. If ''M'' is not connected, its signature is defined to be the sum of the signatures of its connected components. |
Revision as of 19:27, 28 April 2017
This article does not cite any sources. Please help improve this article by adding citations to reliable sources. Unsourced material may be challenged and removed. Find sources: "Signature" topology – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR (December 2009) (Learn how and when to remove this message) |
In the mathematical field of topology, the signature is an integer invariant which is defined for an oriented manifold M of dimension d=4k divisible by four (doubly even-dimensional).
This invariant of a manifold has been studied in detail, starting with Rokhlin's theorem for 4-manifolds.
Definition
Given a connected and oriented manifold M of dimension 4k, the cup product gives rise to a quadratic form Q on the 'middle' real cohomology group.
The basic identity for the cup product
shows that with p = q = 2k the product is symmetric. It takes values in
- .
If we assume also that M is compact, Poincaré duality identifies this with
which can be identified with . Therefore cup product, under these hypotheses, does give rise to a symmetric bilinear form on H(M,R); and therefore to a quadratic form Q. The form Q is non-degenerate due to Poincaré duality, as it pairs non-degenerately with itself. More generally, the signature can be defined in this way for any general compact polyhedron with 4n-dimensional Poincaré duality.
The signature of M is by definition the signature of Q, an ordered triple according to its definition. If M is not connected, its signature is defined to be the sum of the signatures of its connected components.
Other dimensions
Further information: L-theoryIf M has dimension not divisible by 4, its signature is usually defined to be 0. There are alternative generalization in L-theory: the signature can be interpreted as the 4k-dimensional (simply-connected) symmetric L-group or as the 4k-dimensional quadratic L-group and these invariants do not always vanish for other dimensions. The Kervaire invariant is a mod 2 (i.e., an element of ) for framed manifolds of dimension 4k+2 (the quadratic L-group ), while the de Rham invariant is a mod 2 invariant of manifolds of dimension 4k+1 (the symmetric L-group ); the other dimensional L-groups vanish.
Kervaire invariant
Main article: Kervaire invariantWhen is twice an odd integer (singly even), the same construction gives rise to an antisymmetric bilinear form. Such forms do not have a signature invariant; if they are non-degenerate, any two such forms are equivalent. However, if one takes a quadratic refinement of the form, which occurs if one has a framed manifold, then the resulting ε-quadratic forms need not be equivalent, being distinguished by the Arf invariant. The resulting invariant of a manifold is called the Kervaire invariant.
Properties
René Thom (1954) showed that the signature of a manifold is a cobordism invariant, and in particular is given by some linear combination of its Pontryagin numbers. Friedrich Hirzebruch (1954) found an explicit expression for this linear combination as the L genus of the manifold. William Browder (1962) proved that a simply-connected compact polyhedron with 4n-dimensional Poincaré duality is homotopy equivalent to a manifold if and only if its signature satisfies the expression of the Hirzebruch signature theorem.
See also
References
- Hatcher, Allen (2003). Algebraic topology (PDF) (Repr. ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Pr. p. 250. ISBN 978-0521795401. Retrieved 8 January 2017.