User talk:Drivarum: Difference between revisions

Browse history interactively ← Previous edit Next edit →Content deleted Content addedVisual WikitextInline

Revision as of 16:53, 17 May 2017 editDrivarum (talk \| contribs)94 edits →Update ← Previous edit		Revision as of 17:02, 17 May 2017 edit undoIvanvector (talk \| contribs)Checkusers, Administrators52,227 edits →Update: replyNext edit →
Line 47:		Line 47:
	{{ping\|Ivanvector}} I read your ANI post and sorry but it seems one sided and you already made conclusion that I am a sock and User:Terabar is harassing but honestly you failed to see the other side of the story. '''User:Capitals00''' has been accusing me and filed invalid reports against me. '''User:Capitals00''' reverted me when I opened a talk page discussion on '''User:D4iNa4''''s edits. Never bothered to discuss with me until another admin involved in it. The CU results didn't even link me with the blocked account very similar to '''User:Capitals00''''s SPI case. Every time '''User:D4iNa4''' and '''User:Capitals00''' come together to the same article to revert other editors. Their reverts on the ] is huge. Anyone can check the page's edit history. Thank you.] (]) 16:24, 17 May 2017 (UTC)		{{ping\|Ivanvector}} I read your ANI post and sorry but it seems one sided and you already made conclusion that I am a sock and User:Terabar is harassing but honestly you failed to see the other side of the story. '''User:Capitals00''' has been accusing me and filed invalid reports against me. '''User:Capitals00''' reverted me when I opened a talk page discussion on '''User:D4iNa4''''s edits. Never bothered to discuss with me until another admin involved in it. The CU results didn't even link me with the blocked account very similar to '''User:Capitals00''''s SPI case. Every time '''User:D4iNa4''' and '''User:Capitals00''' come together to the same article to revert other editors. Their reverts on the ] is huge. Anyone can check the page's edit history. Thank you.] (]) 16:24, 17 May 2017 (UTC)
	:{{ping\|Ivanvector}} User:Terabar can't be related with User:OccultZone as they have opposite editing patterns. Rather User:OccultZone's sock User:Delibzr has similar interest with User:Capitals00 and User:D4iNa4. Clearly, you're seeing just one half of the story. ] (]) 16:53, 17 May 2017 (UTC)		:{{ping\|Ivanvector}} User:Terabar can't be related with User:OccultZone as they have opposite editing patterns. Rather User:OccultZone's sock User:Delibzr has similar interest with User:Capitals00 and User:D4iNa4. Clearly, you're seeing just one half of the story. ] (]) 16:53, 17 May 2017 (UTC)
			*{{ec}} Drivarum, I blocked you because of several things indicating you are the sockpuppet of another editor. First of all, two different edits you made at ] not only restored the text and sources of the previous sockpuppet's edit, you also used the same exact ''code'' for the reference including the same Google Books hash and the same access date. In addition, your first two edits are to your user page and talk page and then you didn't edit at all for over a month, which is a behaviour typical of editors who are creating multiple accounts. Then, your next edit (your first article edit) was joining into a revert war where you had not edited the page at all before, which suggests you knew about the edit war because you were editing the page with another account, or somebody told you to come and revert there (neither one is allowed). And lastly, I had earlier warned {{ul\|Terabar}} not to continue attacking and ] Capitals00 and D4iNa4, and it's very strange that practically the very next day you began attacking and hounding them in the same way even though you had not edited before.
			:I've noticed that you have filed a UTRS ticket in which you haven't addressed these things but are continuing to blame other editors when it is only your own behaviour which leads to you being blocked. If you can explain these series of coincidences, and show me that you understand why you can't ] or ] other editors, and that you will slow down and ] your edits if they are reverted, then I will consider unblocking you so that you can continue participating in the discussion at ] which {{ul\|El C}} had started. Thank you. ] (<sup>]</sup>/<sub>]</sub>) 17:02, 17 May 2017 (UTC)

Revision as of 17:02, 17 May 2017

edit warring noticeboard

] Capitals00 (talk) 06:47, 17 May 2017 (UTC)

3RR warning

Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. El_C 07:01, 17 May 2017 (UTC)

BLP warning

Please do not add unreferenced or poorly referenced information, especially if controversial, to articles or any other page on Misplaced Pages about living (or recently deceased) persons. Thank you. El_C 07:01, 17 May 2017 (UTC)

Blocked

@Ivanvector: please tell me why you blocked me? I am not related to this case. Drivarum (talk) 14:31, 17 May 2017 (UTC)

There is currently a discussion at Misplaced Pages:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is Southeast Asian religion: disruptive forumshopping. Ivanvector (/_Edits) 15:17, 17 May 2017 (UTC)

@Ivanvector: please tell me do you have anything personal with me? How do I comment there when you blocked me? Please, at least unblock me so that I can put comments on my defense please. --Drivarum (talk) 15:21, 17 May 2017 (UTC)

This blocked user is asking that their block be reviewed on the Unblock Ticket Request System:

Drivarum (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

UTRS appeal #18315 was submitted on May 17, 2017 15:35:08.

Notes:

If you are the blocked user, an administrator will find your request on UTRS and should email you shortly. Please do not request additional unblocks. Tickets may take 24-48 hours to process. Tickets will expire after 1 week if you have not responded via the web interface to any emails from the reviewing administrator.
Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.

--UTRSBot (talk) 15:35, 17 May 2017 (UTC)

Please, read my message

@Ivanvector: Sir, I will make it short and straight to the point.

Firstly, you blocked me for "partially restoring a previous sockpuppet's edits" then you should block User:Bonadea because she entirely restored the blocked user's edits here, the, , and and every time User:D4iNa4 reverted her edits.

Secondly, if using edits of a blocked user's edit from page history leads to block then why User:D4iNa4 and User:Capitals00 shouldn't be blocked? Because they are stating same reason and making same edits as the blocked User:Delibzr , , , , , etc.

On a side note both User:D4iNa4 and User:Capitals00 were blocked for sockpuppeting and here is User:Capitals00's socks and User:D4iNa4's socks and both revert edits to avoid 3RR and participate on AFD as well.

Thank you. Drivarum (talk) 15:57, 17 May 2017 (UTC)

You are saying this, because you have to assume bad faith in order to WP:GAME system.

Bonadea was WP:NOTBORNYESTERDAY like you are.
It was Sitush who first mentioned WP:BLPCAT on the talk page and later on other editors got the point.
Only those entries have been restored that have consensus from other reputed editors. Find it funny you are not counting many of those editors.
You are also blocked on your main account for sock puppetry, but you are evading your block, that's why your main account is not unblocked.

You are just shooting yourself in the foot. And increasing chances for other admins to remove talk page access. Capitals00 (talk) 16:07, 17 May 2017 (UTC)

I do not know many of these Misplaced Pages policies you're throwing at me. I don't have any socks like you had. I appealed the block with valid reasons. The "User Compare Report?" provided by User:Terabar shows how you two users operate after certain days. You still haven't answered to several accusations you made to me.

Here you said "Hema Malini is not even a Muslim, and her husband's name is also frequently mentioned by @Drivarum: despite he rejected any conversions to Islam." — Can you please show me where I mentioned her husband's name?
Here you reverted me when I opened a talk page discussion with the other editor User:D4iNa4. Please, tell me why?
Here why you filed a wrong complaint against me without notifying me of 3RR/BLP which was later done by an admin?
Lastly you didn't answer how you know User:Rzvas has same IP with yours ? BTW, User:Rzvas has vast intersection with your edits including reverting sourced information. Drivarum (talk) 16:44, 17 May 2017 (UTC)

Update

@Ivanvector: I read your ANI post and sorry but it seems one sided and you already made conclusion that I am a sock and User:Terabar is harassing but honestly you failed to see the other side of the story. User:Capitals00 has been accusing me and filed invalid reports against me. User:Capitals00 reverted me when I opened a talk page discussion on User:D4iNa4's edits. Never bothered to discuss with me until another admin involved in it. The CU results didn't even link me with the blocked account very similar to User:Capitals00's SPI case. Every time User:D4iNa4 and User:Capitals00 come together to the same article to revert other editors. Their reverts on the List of converts to Islam from Hinduism is huge. Anyone can check the page's edit history. Thank you.Drivarum (talk) 16:24, 17 May 2017 (UTC)

@Ivanvector: User:Terabar can't be related with User:OccultZone as they have opposite editing patterns. Rather User:OccultZone's sock User:Delibzr has similar interest with User:Capitals00 and User:D4iNa4. Clearly, you're seeing just one half of the story. Drivarum (talk) 16:53, 17 May 2017 (UTC)

(edit conflict) Drivarum, I blocked you because of several things indicating you are the sockpuppet of another editor. First of all, two different edits you made at List of converts to Islam from Hinduism not only restored the text and sources of the previous sockpuppet's edit, you also used the same exact code for the reference including the same Google Books hash and the same access date. In addition, your first two edits are to your user page and talk page and then you didn't edit at all for over a month, which is a behaviour typical of editors who are creating multiple accounts. Then, your next edit (your first article edit) was joining into a revert war where you had not edited the page at all before, which suggests you knew about the edit war because you were editing the page with another account, or somebody told you to come and revert there (neither one is allowed). And lastly, I had earlier warned Terabar not to continue attacking and hounding Capitals00 and D4iNa4, and it's very strange that practically the very next day you began attacking and hounding them in the same way even though you had not edited before.

I've noticed that you have filed a UTRS ticket in which you haven't addressed these things but are continuing to blame other editors when it is only your own behaviour which leads to you being blocked. If you can explain these series of coincidences, and show me that you understand why you can't edit war or hound other editors, and that you will slow down and discuss your edits if they are reverted, then I will consider unblocking you so that you can continue participating in the discussion at Talk:List of converts to Islam from Hinduism which El C had started. Thank you. Ivanvector (/_Edits) 17:02, 17 May 2017 (UTC)

Category:

Requests for unblock on UTRS

Revision as of 16:53, 17 May 2017 editDrivarum (talk \| contribs)94 edits →Update ← Previous edit		Revision as of 17:02, 17 May 2017 edit undoIvanvector (talk \| contribs)Checkusers, Administrators52,227 edits →Update: replyNext edit →
Line 47:		Line 47:
	{{ping\|Ivanvector}} I read your ANI post and sorry but it seems one sided and you already made conclusion that I am a sock and User:Terabar is harassing but honestly you failed to see the other side of the story. '''User:Capitals00''' has been accusing me and filed invalid reports against me. '''User:Capitals00''' reverted me when I opened a talk page discussion on '''User:D4iNa4''''s edits. Never bothered to discuss with me until another admin involved in it. The CU results didn't even link me with the blocked account very similar to '''User:Capitals00''''s SPI case. Every time '''User:D4iNa4''' and '''User:Capitals00''' come together to the same article to revert other editors. Their reverts on the ] is huge. Anyone can check the page's edit history. Thank you.] (]) 16:24, 17 May 2017 (UTC)		{{ping\|Ivanvector}} I read your ANI post and sorry but it seems one sided and you already made conclusion that I am a sock and User:Terabar is harassing but honestly you failed to see the other side of the story. '''User:Capitals00''' has been accusing me and filed invalid reports against me. '''User:Capitals00''' reverted me when I opened a talk page discussion on '''User:D4iNa4''''s edits. Never bothered to discuss with me until another admin involved in it. The CU results didn't even link me with the blocked account very similar to '''User:Capitals00''''s SPI case. Every time '''User:D4iNa4''' and '''User:Capitals00''' come together to the same article to revert other editors. Their reverts on the ] is huge. Anyone can check the page's edit history. Thank you.] (]) 16:24, 17 May 2017 (UTC)
	:{{ping\|Ivanvector}} User:Terabar can't be related with User:OccultZone as they have opposite editing patterns. Rather User:OccultZone's sock User:Delibzr has similar interest with User:Capitals00 and User:D4iNa4. Clearly, you're seeing just one half of the story. ] (]) 16:53, 17 May 2017 (UTC)		:{{ping\|Ivanvector}} User:Terabar can't be related with User:OccultZone as they have opposite editing patterns. Rather User:OccultZone's sock User:Delibzr has similar interest with User:Capitals00 and User:D4iNa4. Clearly, you're seeing just one half of the story. ] (]) 16:53, 17 May 2017 (UTC)
			*{{ec}} Drivarum, I blocked you because of several things indicating you are the sockpuppet of another editor. First of all, two different edits you made at ] not only restored the text and sources of the previous sockpuppet's edit, you also used the same exact ''code'' for the reference including the same Google Books hash and the same access date. In addition, your first two edits are to your user page and talk page and then you didn't edit at all for over a month, which is a behaviour typical of editors who are creating multiple accounts. Then, your next edit (your first article edit) was joining into a revert war where you had not edited the page at all before, which suggests you knew about the edit war because you were editing the page with another account, or somebody told you to come and revert there (neither one is allowed). And lastly, I had earlier warned {{ul\|Terabar}} not to continue attacking and ] Capitals00 and D4iNa4, and it's very strange that practically the very next day you began attacking and hounding them in the same way even though you had not edited before.
			:I've noticed that you have filed a UTRS ticket in which you haven't addressed these things but are continuing to blame other editors when it is only your own behaviour which leads to you being blocked. If you can explain these series of coincidences, and show me that you understand why you can't ] or ] other editors, and that you will slow down and ] your edits if they are reverted, then I will consider unblocking you so that you can continue participating in the discussion at ] which {{ul\|El C}} had started. Thank you. ] (<sup>]</sup>/<sub>]</sub>) 17:02, 17 May 2017 (UTC)