Misplaced Pages

User talk:GliderMaven: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 00:20, 17 May 2017 editAnarchyte (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Oversighters, Administrators41,858 edits WannaCry: new section← Previous edit Revision as of 17:53, 17 May 2017 edit undoGliderMaven (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users15,503 edits WannaCry: I appreciate itNext edit →
Line 8: Line 8:


Hey, just wanted to apologise directly for the invalid closure. I've left my opinions on the merge there instead, now. Hope you have a great day! Cheers, '''<font face="Papyrus">] <font color="#000"><small>(] &#124; ])</small></font></font>''' 00:20, 17 May 2017 (UTC) Hey, just wanted to apologise directly for the invalid closure. I've left my opinions on the merge there instead, now. Hope you have a great day! Cheers, '''<font face="Papyrus">] <font color="#000"><small>(] &#124; ])</small></font></font>''' 00:20, 17 May 2017 (UTC)

:Yeah, thanks, I appreciate it. That was a bit dodgy- it's rarely worth trying to circumvent the process like that. Mergers usually run for at least several days, but 6 hours and four votes were way, way too short. While investigating it, I found that WP:SNOW is not actually policy, it's only an essay. Anyway, I'm pleasantly surprised how the !vote is turning out, I was somewhat reluctant to undo it, it could well have snowed anyway.] (]) 17:53, 17 May 2017 (UTC)

Revision as of 17:53, 17 May 2017

May 14 ANI

Information icon There is currently a discussion at Misplaced Pages:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved.

See my contributions page. 73.61.20.253 (talk) 15:31, 14 May 2017 (UTC)

WannaCry

Hey, just wanted to apologise directly for the invalid closure. I've left my opinions on the merge there instead, now. Hope you have a great day! Cheers, Anarchyte (work | talk) 00:20, 17 May 2017 (UTC)

Yeah, thanks, I appreciate it. That was a bit dodgy- it's rarely worth trying to circumvent the process like that. Mergers usually run for at least several days, but 6 hours and four votes were way, way too short. While investigating it, I found that WP:SNOW is not actually policy, it's only an essay. Anyway, I'm pleasantly surprised how the !vote is turning out, I was somewhat reluctant to undo it, it could well have snowed anyway.GliderMaven (talk) 17:53, 17 May 2017 (UTC)