| Revision as of 01:06, 29 September 2006 editHkelkar (talk | contribs)7,279 edits →Hkelkar← Previous edit | Revision as of 08:31, 29 September 2006 edit undoIkonoblast (talk | contribs)3,014 edits →Hkelkar: --- commentNext edit → | ||
| Line 20: | Line 20: | ||
| ] 01:06, 29 September 2006 (UTC) | ] 01:06, 29 September 2006 (UTC) | ||
| If possible plz check ] too for he is indulged in removing warnings from all the alleged socks of above like , after they are warned not to rmv warnings.<span style="border: 1px solid">]</span>|] 08:31, 29 September 2006 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 08:31, 29 September 2006
Hkelkar
- Hkelkar (talk · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
- Densagueo (talk · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
- Subhash bose (talk · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
User densaguo was created after subhash was banned and then Hkelkar lobbied for Subhash's relaxation and extension of Holywarrior's ban same is repeated by Densaguo almost to word at a different place besides he refers Subhash as Netaji cannot be known to new user for he was not even useng it as signature Ikon |no-blast 13:22, 28 September 2006 (UTC)
- This accusation again?An RFCU was filed against me earlier for the expressed purpose of getting me blocked as part of a defmaation campaign against me and was rather quickly dismissed by admins. I believe that the motivations of the user who has files this RFCU should be analysed, given his block log both as ikonoblast and his earlier user User:Holywarrior.Hkelkar 21:47, 28 September 2006 (UTC)
Clerk note: See previous case Misplaced Pages:Requests for checkuser/Case/Subhash bose. The report wasn't "dismissed," the evidence at that time was inconclusive. Thatcher131 22:20, 28 September 2006 (UTC)
- Reply to all - There have been three checkusers filed for Subhash_bose and one for Hkelkar all by the same cabal of editors. It seems WP:Tendentious editors (including the one that filed this RFCU) have nothing to do but to harp on about fantasical conspiracy theories.Bakaman Bakatalk 23:59, 28 September 2006 (UTC)
- Another misleading contention made by the user ikonoblast above is the holywarrior business. In fact, User:holywarrior and User:Ikonoblast are one and the same person (see holywarrior's user page) and a study of his block log and contribs will show tendentious editing and multiple intimidation tactics used by him to bully and distress users in similar manners as this fraudulent RFCU.Hkelkar 00:49, 29 September 2006 (UTC)
- Point of fact, if you look at densagueo's talk page:
http://en.wikipedia.org/User_talk:Densagueo I had admonished him for interfering with a discussion going on by me. He replied that he was just trying to help and got bitten per a violation of WP:BITE by other users and so left wikipedia.He was thanked for helping. The diffs of his attempted mediation are given below: http://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=User_talk:Shell_Kinney&diff=prev&oldid=73749066 http://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=User_talk:Ikonoblast&diff=prev&oldid=73749996 http://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=User_talk:Shell_Kinney&diff=prev&oldid=73737401
Hkelkar 01:06, 29 September 2006 (UTC)
If possible plz check user:Bakasuprman too for he is indulged in removing warnings from all the alleged socks of above like this , after they are warned not to rmv warnings. Ikon |no-blast 08:31, 29 September 2006 (UTC)