Revision as of 07:54, 29 September 2006 editFreedom skies (talk | contribs)4,714 editsNo edit summary← Previous edit | Revision as of 08:55, 29 September 2006 edit undoIkonoblast (talk | contribs)3,014 edits Don't rmv warningsNext edit → | ||
Line 130: | Line 130: | ||
==Indrancroos== | ==Indrancroos== | ||
Thanks for rving the crazy edits, so to speak. The guy seems to working all too hard on abusing the article. Where do I report guys like that around here ?? to an admin ?? ] 07:54, 29 September 2006 (UTC) | Thanks for rving the crazy edits, so to speak. The guy seems to working all too hard on abusing the article. Where do I report guys like that around here ?? to an admin ?? ] 07:54, 29 September 2006 (UTC) | ||
== Don't rmv warnings == | |||
] This is your '''last warning'''. <br>The next time you ] a page, you ''will'' be ] from editing Misplaced Pages. <!-- Template:Test4 (Fourth level warning) --> .This was regarding .<span style="border: 1px solid">]</span>|] 08:55, 29 September 2006 (UTC) |
Revision as of 08:55, 29 September 2006
Archive1 July - August 7 06' (30kB)
Archive2 August 8 - August 14 (?kB)
Archive3 August 14 - August 26 (32kB)
Archive4 August 26 -September 1 (31kB)
Archive5 September 1 - September 11 (40kB)
Archive6 September 11 - September 27 (64kB)
I give myself the authority to remove bogus warning templates from my page Bakaman Bakatalk 04:19, 14 August 2006 (UTC)
===I have closed off correspondence=== with User:Geek1975 in response to the hate attack and his/their persistent vandalism of my user talk pages , , , and , Ditto for User:Holywarrior - I have nothing to do with Holywarrior anymore. Add to the list user Zora for maligning me on a CfD using emotional blackmail and motive assignment.===Bakaman Bakatalk 22:57, 23 August 2006 (UTC)
Why Adi-shakara charya had to crush Vishnu's religion?
"Buddhism declined because they couldn't argue with Adi Shankara, he crushed them in his debates, and because peace is not the best way to fight the Muslim conquest of the Indian subcontinent."
This is your comment from talk page
My Question: If Buddhism was part of Hinduism(Brahmin Religion). If Buddha was an avatara of Vishnu, why Adi-Shankaracharya had to crush them? Didnt he crush, Vishnu's religion then? Wasn't it against his religion then? Why he selectively crushed Buddha's religion and not Krishna's Geeta?
BTY what happend to Shankarayacharya? I would like to know how and where he died? If you have information I would delighted if you could share that. Thanks.--Bodhidhamma 20:59, 27 September 2006 (UTC)
- The "reasoning" provided above is a violation of WP:NOR. Find sources that attest to the reasoning.Hkelkar 01:52, 28 September 2006 (UTC)
I havent provided any reasoning? They are all questions my friend? And these are very logical questions. You dont need special documentation for that. I hope you know basic geometry. If first triangle is similar to second triangle and second triangle is similar to third triangle then first trianle has to be similar to third on. Simple logic.
If Buddha = Vishnu's avatar And Adi Shankaracharya = Follower of Vishnu Then Adi Shakara should be Follower/believer of Buddha.
If any condition if false, the whole logic is false. --Bodhidhamma 02:11, 28 September 2006 (UTC)
- What I meant was that Buddhism faltered because Buddhist monks and scholars were unable to defeat Shankaracharya in debate. In olden days, the loser of the debate had to let go of his viewpoint and accept the winners opinion as paramount. In that mold many great Buddhist scholars reverted back to hinduism. Buddhism (in India)'s death blow was given by the Muslims, Shankara merely undermined its philosophical legitimacy.Bakaman Bakatalk 02:13, 28 September 2006 (UTC)
- Well I guess Bakasupram you are a true Brahmin (not in offending way though). This is the reason why Adi shankaracharya won against Buddhist monks. Budhhist are mostly straight forward in thinking. But brahmins can think in cunning way too. They know when to back off and change the topic, how to add confusion when they dont have clear answer :-) no offence, just my observation.
Anyways, Please let me know about Acharya's Death. I have heard a story from my grand father, uncle etc. But looking for a Brahmin perspective. (I prefer not to call Hindu as I do not agree with the defination provided here.) —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Dhammafriend (talk • contribs) .
- I'm not an expert on his death, only his life. Remeber 1000 years ago life expectancy was down in the upper 30's lower 40's at max. Also, it seems that may scholars that were Krishnabhakths died the same kind of "death" (see Chaitanya Mahaprabhu), while appealing to the emotions are almost improbable. Brahmins are merely Hindus, especially where I am, caste has ceased to be of any consequence.Bakaman Bakatalk 02:33, 28 September 2006 (UTC)
Shankaracharya died at his age of 32. I don't think that the life span was between 30 to 40 yrs. then.
Swadhyayee 03:50, 28 September 2006 (UTC)
Thank You Very Very Much.
Thank you very very much Mr.Bakasuprman for improving my user page. I just want to know, how do you get to know about my page, are there any tools from where one can come to know about the changes?
I uploaded an image "India" with Indian map. I do not know and could not place it on my user page.
With Love,
Swadhyayee. Swadhyayee 03:46, 28 September 2006 (UTC)
Category:Assamese people vs Category:People from Assam/Category:Historical People of Assam
Hi Bakasuprman,
You have made changes in these categories that I have been building up based on geographical, ethnic and time considerations. If you agree to the basis of my categorization (), could you kindly revert your changes?
Thanks—Chaipau 11:59, 28 September 2006 (UTC)
Ikonoblast is back with his tactics
- Could you contribute to
- He has ben levelling the old charges of sockpuppetry against me all over again. I really think an RfA against this user is in order.Hkelkar 13:17, 28 September 2006 (UTC)
Do you have idea?
Do you have idea that the time mentioned in history of an article is what time? Is it U.S. time?
Swadhyayee 17:45, 28 September 2006 (UTC)
Ikonoblast creating problems
- He filed another bogus RFCU rehashing old accusations again. Could you please help me recover the old sockpuppetry case again?
Here:
http://en.wikipedia.org/Wikipedia:Requests_for_checkuser/Case/Hkelkar#Hkelkar
Hkelkar 21:50, 28 September 2006 (UTC)
you could not have made a worse comparison
Also don't reply to this or continue the discussion - not relevant to WP and no point in doing so. Rama's arrow 00:37, 29 September 2006 (UTC)
- I'm unapologetic.Bakaman Bakatalk 00:38, 29 September 2006 (UTC)
Fine
Thank you. --Bhadani 01:43, 29 September 2006 (UTC)
Thanks a lot.
Thanks a lot, Mr.Bakasuprman.
Swadhyayee 02:00, 29 September 2006 (UTC)
Re: Enjoying?
Hmm! Really enjoying :)
I see you've already suffered a lot. Have these issues been discussed before at some common forum, such as Misplaced Pages:Rfc or Misplaced Pages:Notice board for India-related topics? If not, I will first try to discuss them at the notice-board, so that everybody can participate. utcursch | talk 03:28, 29 September 2006 (UTC)
Kill Mahawiki mission
Hi Baka, if u remember u had adviced me to be cool with Bnguyen and the same I did when admin actually realised that i am not all that bad as other guys potray me.Unfortunately he isnt active these days and hence Sarvagnya is doing everything possible to get me blocked.He hasnt left any stone unturned.He is actually spamming each and every admin against me.This is very cheap.Gosh why doesnt admins take note of his hatred towrads Marathi Hindi Tamil and Sanskrit>? What bothers me more is that ppl are actually coming into his trap.I donno why but no one has looked into Belgaon talk page where this guy was as incivil as he can.While his other frind Dinesh by taking help of a extrimist book is manipulating history articles here.This is extremely objectionable.He is glorifies his state language and terms all histirical dynasties as of being Kannada origin. Frankly speaking,there is no justice here.Its only who's able to woo admins is a winner.The new admin in question has started his 'peace process' by terming me as a more serious trouble maker!I think instead of giving in to this injustice its better I get reincarnated as a 'troll' 'vandaliser' which these ppl are telling everyone so that I can turn Sarvagnya's climax into anti-climax. Mahawiki 04:23, 29 September 2006 (UTC)
Stuff
Man, you get a lot of mail Bakaman. As for all the Indian disputes, as well as a the deletion log, it appears that most admins only became an administrator for self-promotion or something, because 90% of the deletes are done by 3-4% of the admins, and the rest of the admins don't do much. Same for the India disputes actually, there are a lot of guys running loose om #wikipedia-in IRC and won't help keep things in order whilst I'm *away*. So I feel like some of those pictures that Indrancroos uploaded. Anyway, I deleted the pictures as "vandalism" and vblocked him for 3 months. Thanks, Blnguyen | BLabberiNg 04:34, 29 September 2006 (UTC)
bodhidhamma
but its bodhidhamma who is havin problems. I dont know how shall i handle him. should we approach the admins.nids(♂) 05:24, 29 September 2006 (UTC)
Indrancroos
Thanks for rving the crazy edits, so to speak. The guy seems to working all too hard on abusing the article. Where do I report guys like that around here ?? to an admin ?? Freedom skies 07:54, 29 September 2006 (UTC)
Don't rmv warnings
This is your last warning.
The next time you vandalize a page, you will be blocked from editing Misplaced Pages. .This was regarding this. Ikon |no-blast 08:55, 29 September 2006 (UTC)