| Revision as of 23:07, 21 May 2006 editCJ DUB (talk | contribs)2,135 edits Consumer Reports← Previous edit | Revision as of 06:19, 3 October 2006 edit undoEpimetreus (talk | contribs)200 edits Request for referencesNext edit → | ||
| Line 19: | Line 19: | ||
| HAHA. What eveidence is there that they are "not for profit"? Utter nonsense. ] 23:07, 21 May 2006 (UTC) | HAHA. What eveidence is there that they are "not for profit"? Utter nonsense. ] 23:07, 21 May 2006 (UTC) | ||
| == References? == | |||
| No cited references except for the company's website, and no cited source for the "Criticism" section. I don't dispute or support anything in the article, but it would be improved by some external information on the subject. | |||
| -- ] 06:19, 3 October 2006 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 06:19, 3 October 2006
Huh?
"JD Power supporters however point out that their surveys are influential and therefore it doesn't matter if they are reliable." -that "supporters" viewpoint doesn't sound very supportive, if I knew what supporters actually thought I'd change it, but I didn't even know there was a debate 216.207.246.230 03:03, 18 May 2006 (UTC)
Merger
There is another article for "J.D. Power". Shouldn't the two be combined, and one deleted?
- yea i just found it. they should be merged. 70.111.251.203 17:49, 6 May 2006 (UTC)
Odd...
I always figured they were owned by a certain crappy US car company.
I guess direct ownership would be too obvious. They probably get paid under the table.
24.110.60.225 21:14, 12 March 2006 (UTC)
Consumer Reports
HAHA. What eveidence is there that they are "not for profit"? Utter nonsense. CJ DUB 23:07, 21 May 2006 (UTC)
References?
No cited references except for the company's website, and no cited source for the "Criticism" section. I don't dispute or support anything in the article, but it would be improved by some external information on the subject.