Misplaced Pages

Koenraad Elst: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 08:23, 2 October 2006 view sourceBondego (talk | contribs)860 editsmNo edit summary← Previous edit Revision as of 13:28, 3 October 2006 view source 160.39.52.236 (talk)No edit summaryNext edit →
Line 14: Line 14:
He seems not to have changed his religion, for he said: ''"I am neither a ] nor a nationalist. And I don’t need to belong to those or to any specific ideological categories in order to use my eyes and ears. (...) As I said, I am phasing out my involvement with ] studies. The subject is really very simple, the problem as well as the solution. It isn’t all that challenging and interesting, it only seemed that way because of the artificial obstacles thrown up by the secularists."'' <ref></ref> And he wrote: ''"However, I do readily admit to being a “fellow-traveller” of Dharmic civilization in its struggle for survival against the ongoing aggression and subversion by well-organized hostile ideologies."'' <ref></ref> He seems not to have changed his religion, for he said: ''"I am neither a ] nor a nationalist. And I don’t need to belong to those or to any specific ideological categories in order to use my eyes and ears. (...) As I said, I am phasing out my involvement with ] studies. The subject is really very simple, the problem as well as the solution. It isn’t all that challenging and interesting, it only seemed that way because of the artificial obstacles thrown up by the secularists."'' <ref></ref> And he wrote: ''"However, I do readily admit to being a “fellow-traveller” of Dharmic civilization in its struggle for survival against the ongoing aggression and subversion by well-organized hostile ideologies."'' <ref></ref>


Koenraad Elst is a controversial figure. He has been able to gain only limited acceptance among the dominant stream of the academic study of South Asia/India both in the West and in India, because many academics, including such as are internationally influential, regard him as biased and agenda-based. He is very much in the centre of debates between so-called "]" and the so-called "]" or "]" groups,<ref>All three terms reproduced here are those used by the respective opponents in such debates and are not to be taken at face value.</ref> being either acclaimed or rejected according to the respective stance of those concerned. As values and opinions play a dominant role in this matter, the evaluation of such controversies is extremely difficult.
Koenraad Elst has been at times a controversial figure, and some ]s have a negative view of Elst's works. Elst described some of these controversies in his works:


⚫ Elst has also published many articles in Dutch, and he contributed to the conservative magazine <ref></ref>, along with other interventions described as emanating from right-wing circles in Belgium<ref>See "some more reading matter about Dr. K. Elst" by Prof. R. Zydenbos in .</ref>. Koenraad Elst is also a contributor to the "conservative-libertarian" internet magazine ], the flemish satirical weekly ] and other Belgian or Dutch publications. He also wrote for Indian magazines like Outlook India and the Kashmir Herald. He wrote a postcript to a book written by the neoconservative ] ("]").
{{cquote|''The atmosphere at the conference was frankly hostile... When it was my turn, I was heckled somewhat by the Leftist crowd, especially by a well-known Indo-American Communist academic, who was rolling his eyes like a madman and making obscene gestures until an elderly American lady sitting next to him told him to behave. At the end, Mathew came to collect a copy of my text (...), called me a “liar”, and told his buddies that they needed to write a scholarly rebuttal. Which is still being awaited today.''<ref>Koenraad Elst, Ayodhya: The Case Against the Temple, chapter 11</ref>}}

⚫ Elst has also published many articles in Dutch, he contributed for example to the conservative magazine <ref></ref>, along with other interventions described as emanating from right-wing circles in Belgium<ref>See "some more reading matter about Dr. K. Elst" by Prof. R. Zydenbos in .</ref>. Koenraad Elst is also a contributor to the "conservative-libertarian" internet magazine ], the flemish satirical weekly ] and other Belgian or Dutch publications. He also wrote for Indian magazines like ] and the Kashmir Herald. He wrote a postcript to a book written by the neoconservative ] ("]").


On the ideological side, it was claimed that K. Elst's citations, referred authors and developments take place in the general framework of nationalist and reformist ideologies, which appeared in India in the late XIXth century and in the beginning of the XXth century<ref>For a description of the rising of reformist ideologies in India see ] "Introduction To The Study Of The Hindu Doctrines", chapter "Vedanta Westernized".</ref>. On the ideological side, it was claimed that K. Elst's citations, referred authors and developments take place in the general framework of nationalist and reformist ideologies, which appeared in India in the late XIXth century and in the beginning of the XXth century<ref>For a description of the rising of reformist ideologies in India see ] "Introduction To The Study Of The Hindu Doctrines", chapter "Vedanta Westernized".</ref>.
Line 50: Line 48:
*The Ayodhya debate: focus on the "no temple" evidence, World Archaeological Congress, 1998 *The Ayodhya debate: focus on the "no temple" evidence, World Archaeological Congress, 1998
*India's Only Communalist: In Commemoration of Sita Ram Goel (edited by Koenraad Elst, 2005) ISBN 81-85990-78-6 *India's Only Communalist: In Commemoration of Sita Ram Goel (edited by Koenraad Elst, 2005) ISBN 81-85990-78-6
⚫ * '']'', June 1998


== Notes == == Notes ==
Line 71: Line 68:
* *
* *
⚫ *

'''Controversies''' '''Controversies'''
⚫ * Elst's response to a critical essay by Amber Habib
*
* *
** About Robert J. Zydenbos article “An obscurantist argument” ** About Robert J. Zydenbos article “An obscurantist argument”
* *
** **
⚫ * Elst's response to a critical essay by Amber Habib


] ]
Line 89: Line 85:
] ]
] ]
]


] ]

Revision as of 13:28, 3 October 2006

Dr. Koenraad Elst is a Belgian writer, scholar and researcher. He is the author of over ten books on topics related to Hinduism, Indian history, and Indian politics.

Biography

Template:Hindu politics He was born in Leuven, Belgium, on 7 August 1959, into a Flemish Catholic family. He graduated in Philosophy, Chinese Studies and Indo-Iranian Studies at the Catholic University of Leuven.

During a stay at the Benaras Hindu University, he discovered India’s communal problem and wrote his first book about the budding Ayodhya conflict. While establishing himself as a columnist for a number of Belgian and Indian papers, he frequently returned to India to study various aspects of its ethno-religio-political configuration and interview Hindu and other leaders and thinkers. His research on the ideological development of Hindu revivalism earned him his Ph.D. in Leuven in 1998. He has also published about multiculturalism, language policy issues, ancient Chinese history and philosophy, comparative religion, and the Aryan invasion debate. Dr. Elst became a well-known author on Indian politics in the 1990s. He also met the Hindu writer Sita Ram Goel in India, and was influenced by his writings.

Koenraad Elst has also written several books on the Aryan invasion debate, Ayodhya temple issue and issues related to Islam, Christianity and Hinduism.

Controversies and influences

Elst is a member of the Christian-Democratic trade-union. He described himself as "a secular humanist with an active interest in religions, particularly Taoism and Hinduism, and keeping a close watch on the variegated Pagan revival in Europe."

He seems not to have changed his religion, for he said: "I am neither a Hindu nor a nationalist. And I don’t need to belong to those or to any specific ideological categories in order to use my eyes and ears. (...) As I said, I am phasing out my involvement with communalism studies. The subject is really very simple, the problem as well as the solution. It isn’t all that challenging and interesting, it only seemed that way because of the artificial obstacles thrown up by the secularists." And he wrote: "However, I do readily admit to being a “fellow-traveller” of Dharmic civilization in its struggle for survival against the ongoing aggression and subversion by well-organized hostile ideologies."

Koenraad Elst is a controversial figure. He has been able to gain only limited acceptance among the dominant stream of the academic study of South Asia/India both in the West and in India, because many academics, including such as are internationally influential, regard him as biased and agenda-based. He is very much in the centre of debates between so-called "Hindutva" and the so-called "Indian Marxist" or "pseudo-secular" groups, being either acclaimed or rejected according to the respective stance of those concerned. As values and opinions play a dominant role in this matter, the evaluation of such controversies is extremely difficult.

Elst has also published many articles in Dutch, and he contributed to the conservative magazine Nucleus , along with other interventions described as emanating from right-wing circles in Belgium. Koenraad Elst is also a contributor to the "conservative-libertarian" internet magazine The Brussels Journal, the flemish satirical weekly 't Pallieterke and other Belgian or Dutch publications. He also wrote for Indian magazines like Outlook India and the Kashmir Herald. He wrote a postcript to a book written by the neoconservative Daniel Pipes ("The Rushdie Affair: The Novel, the Ayatollah, and the West").

On the ideological side, it was claimed that K. Elst's citations, referred authors and developments take place in the general framework of nationalist and reformist ideologies, which appeared in India in the late XIXth century and in the beginning of the XXth century.

Bibliography

Notes

  1. Article from bharatvani.org
  2. bharatvani.org op. cit.
  3. Elst interview
  4. Voice of Dharma review
  5. All three terms reproduced here are those used by the respective opponents in such debates and are not to be taken at face value.
  6. bharatvani.org op.cit.
  7. See "some more reading matter about Dr. K. Elst" by Prof. R. Zydenbos in .
  8. For a description of the rising of reformist ideologies in India see René Guénon "Introduction To The Study Of The Hindu Doctrines", chapter "Vedanta Westernized".

See also

External links

Controversies

Categories: