Revision as of 21:10, 30 July 2017 editWasechun tashunka (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users1,214 edits Merge← Previous edit | Revision as of 18:42, 31 July 2017 edit undoJackW436 (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users664 edits →MergeNext edit → | ||
Line 33: | Line 33: | ||
Cheers. ] (]) 20:33, 30 July 2017 (UTC) | Cheers. ] (]) 20:33, 30 July 2017 (UTC) | ||
:'''Merge''', both the Grange and Donnybrook articles are completely uncited and read as directories for shops in the localities. ''']'''<small style="font-size:65%;"><sup>]</sup><sub>]</sub></small> 21:10, 30 July 2017 (UTC) | :'''Merge''', both the Grange and Donnybrook articles are completely uncited and read as directories for shops in the localities. ''']'''<small style="font-size:65%;"><sup>]</sup><sub>]</sub></small> 21:10, 30 July 2017 (UTC((Douglas Credit union GRANGE OFFICE)AND The school is not in grange it is nearby)I DONT THINK YOU HAVE A RIGHT TO EDIT IMPORTANT INFORMATION ESPECIALLY YOU ARE NOT FROM THE AREA OR COUNTRY ,YOU ARE NOT ALLOWED )) |
Revision as of 18:42, 31 July 2017
Ireland Start‑class Low‑importance | ||||||||||
|
Cities Start‑class | |||||||
|
It is requested that an image or photograph of Douglas, Cork be included in this article to improve its quality. Please replace this template with a more specific media request template where possible.The Free Image Search Tool or Openverse Creative Commons Search may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites. | Upload |
Untitled
I've put in a population figure of 23,193. This is arrived at using the population of Douglas in County Cork and the population of the Tramore A, Tramore B and Tramore C electoral divisions in the city from the 2006 census.
Schools
Is Christ the King in Douglas or Turner's Cross?Irlchrism 16:39, 17 January 2007 (UTC)
External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Douglas, County Cork. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20051228012914/http://www.cork.anglican.org:80/Parishes/Douglas.html to http://www.cork.anglican.org/Parishes/Douglas.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:15, 16 December 2016 (UTC)
Merge
Hi. Lack of cites or evidence of independent notability notwithstanding, in their current form, the Grange, Cork and Donnybrook, County Cork articles seem to have more than a little overlap with the (main?) Douglas article. And indeed each other. The four merge/redirect criteria (summarised in WP:MERGEREASON) all seem to be largely met. At least to my understanding. In that there is a lot of overlap in the subject matter, duplication in the text, and redundancy in contextual terms.
Where two articles substantively cover the same stuff, a merge is often appropriate. However, before agreeing consensus on whether or what to do, we'd ideally have a quick discussion about it.
For myself I think a merge is appropriate as much of the content in, for example, the Grange article would seem to relate to amenities which are more central to Douglas (St Columba's School, the Credit Union, etc). If Grange extends this far into Douglas proper, why is it covered in a stand-alone article? In the reverse, the Douglas article includes details of amenities (SuperValu, Aldi, etc) which are also then covered in the Grange article. It all seems quite redundant. (The Donnybrook article has similar issues. In that it seems to exist simply to list a few amenities on Donnybrook Hill - some of which (like Ballybrack Woods) are covered in at least one of the other articles.) In general, unless the Grange and Donnybrook articles can be expanded (so that they are more than white or yellow pages listings of an general area), I'd advocate a merge/redirect.
Cheers. Guliolopez (talk) 20:33, 30 July 2017 (UTC)
- Merge, both the Grange and Donnybrook articles are completely uncited and read as directories for shops in the localities. Wasechun tashunkaTRACK 21:10, 30 July 2017 (UTC((Douglas Credit union GRANGE OFFICE)AND The school is not in grange it is nearby)I DONT THINK YOU HAVE A RIGHT TO EDIT IMPORTANT INFORMATION ESPECIALLY YOU ARE NOT FROM THE AREA OR COUNTRY ,YOU ARE NOT ALLOWED ))