| Revision as of 12:40, 23 August 2017 editHillbillyholiday (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users20,577 edits Undid revision 796850544 by KGirlTrucker81 (talk)← Previous edit | Revision as of 12:42, 23 August 2017 edit undoHillbillyholiday (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users20,577 edits link, ceNext edit → | ||
| Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
| :<small class="delsort-notice">Note: This debate has been included in the ]. <font face="Bradley Hand ITC">]</font><sup>]</sup> 01:59, 23 August 2017 (UTC)</small> | :<small class="delsort-notice">Note: This debate has been included in the ]. <font face="Bradley Hand ITC">]</font><sup>]</sup> 01:59, 23 August 2017 (UTC)</small> | ||
| *'''Speedy keep''' No reason for deletion has been provided, unless breast size is considered an argument. Clearly has the necessary coverage to satisfy notability requirements. — ] <sup>]</sup>/<sub>]</sub> 10:52, 23 August 2017 (UTC) | *'''Speedy keep''' No reason for deletion has been provided, unless breast size is considered an argument. Clearly has the necessary coverage to satisfy notability requirements. — ] <sup>]</sup>/<sub>]</sub> 10:52, 23 August 2017 (UTC) | ||
| *'''Comment''' I have reverted {{u|KGirlTrucker81}}'s speedy close. --] (]) 12:40, 23 August 2017 (UTC) | *'''Comment''' I have {{u|KGirlTrucker81}}'s speedy close. --] (]) 12:40, 23 August 2017 (UTC) | ||
| *'''Delete''' I hadn't got round to providing a reason yet, sorry. (Kinda thought it was obvious but..) Just because a person receives some coverage does not make them ], nor does having big breasts make someone suitable subject for an encyclopedia. The only possibly useable source I can see bar Guinness is Huffpo. And Huffpo is shite. Fuck GNG and PR0NNBIO. This article is an embarrassment. --] (]) 12:40, 23 August 2017 (UTC) | *'''Delete''' I hadn't got round to providing a reason yet, sorry. (Kinda thought it was obvious but..) Just because a person receives some coverage does not make them ], nor does having big breasts make someone a suitable subject for an encyclopedia. The only possibly useable source I can see bar Guinness is Huffpo. And Huffpo is shite. Fuck GNG and PR0NNBIO. This article is an embarrassment. --] (]) 12:40, 23 August 2017 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 12:42, 23 August 2017
Norma Stitz
AfDs for this article:- Norma Stitz (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Apparently "Norma" has the largest breasts in the world. That's it. The last AfD was started in 2004. --Hillbillyholiday (talk) 01:18, 23 August 2017 (UTC)
- Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Log/2017 August 23. —Talk to my owner:Online 01:32, 23 August 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU 01:57, 23 August 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Georgia (U.S. state)-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU 01:59, 23 August 2017 (UTC)
- Speedy keep No reason for deletion has been provided, unless breast size is considered an argument. Clearly has the necessary coverage to satisfy notability requirements. — MShabazz /Stalk 10:52, 23 August 2017 (UTC)
- Comment I have reverted KGirlTrucker81's speedy close. --Hillbillyholiday (talk) 12:40, 23 August 2017 (UTC)
- Delete I hadn't got round to providing a reason yet, sorry. (Kinda thought it was obvious but..) Just because a person receives some coverage does not make them notable, nor does having big breasts make someone a suitable subject for an encyclopedia. The only possibly useable source I can see bar Guinness is Huffpo. And Huffpo is shite. Fuck GNG and PR0NNBIO. This article is an embarrassment. --Hillbillyholiday (talk) 12:40, 23 August 2017 (UTC)